Strategic Scheduling Summary Cabrillo College Presented by: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

strategic scheduling summary
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Strategic Scheduling Summary Cabrillo College Presented by: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Strategic Scheduling Summary Cabrillo College Presented by: Benjamin Davis, Software Implementation Consultant, Ad Astra Information Systems Introduction This PowerPoint will serve as a summary of the critical findings of our scheduling


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Strategic Scheduling Summary

Cabrillo College

Presented by: Benjamin Davis, Software Implementation Consultant, Ad Astra Information Systems

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

  • This PowerPoint will serve as a summary of the

critical findings of our scheduling analysis.

  • It includes highlighted sections of standard Astra

Schedule reports run on Cabrillo’s data. These slides will emphasize key data elements that benchmark Cabrillo’s current standings and call attention to areas for improvement.

  • We conclude with strategies to use these reports

to build and monitor policy around more efficient scheduling.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Objectives

  • To guide your institution towards more efficient and

effective academic scheduling policies and practices

  • Two-part learning exercise:

– Capacity Analysis

  • Strategy 1 – Spread class offerings out during the primetime week
  • Strategy 2 – Reduce unused seats in rooms by scheduling classes into

appropriately sized rooms

– Course Offerings Analysis

  • Strategy 3 – Minimize class offerings that use non-standard meeting

patterns

  • Strategy 4 – Evenly utilize prime hours by subject/department
  • Strategy 5 – Reduce the offering of unnecessary sections
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Strategic Approach

1. Drill down from high-level metrics to granular, measurable success drivers for each course offered and room used 2. Benchmark granular success drivers 3. Understand relevant institutional goals and priorities (enrollment growth, cost savings, student outcomes, etc.) 4. Identify and quantify opportunities 5. Select strategies that best meet institution's goals and culture 6. Implement and refine policy supporting strategies

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Area Business Problem Metric Growth Capacity How much can we grow? How quickly can we grow? When will we run out of space?

  • Space Utilization
  • Seat Fill Rates
  • Standard Week
  • Enrollment Ratio

Space Bottlenecks Where are the problem areas? How do we build policy that is relevant? What kind of space to build/renovate?

  • Prime Time Utilization
  • % of Sections Scheduled in

Prime Time

  • Utilization by Room Type
  • On-Grid Meeting Patterns

Course/Student Demand Analysis Are we efficient with our course

  • fferings?
  • Reduction Candidates
  • Low Enrollment Courses

Strategic Study Metrics

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Capacity Analysis

Introduction

Key Concepts

  • Capacity – the maximum

enrollment that can be supported in the current room inventory without compromising quality

  • Efficiency – the extent to

which space, course

  • fferings and faculty are

allocated to effectively align with student and institutional needs Strategies

  • Strategy 1 – Spread class
  • fferings out during the

primetime week, and over the entire scheduling week

  • Strategy 2 – Reduce unused

seats in rooms by scheduling classes into appropriately sized rooms

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Average Utilization does not reflect capacity or inform space management

Space Bottleneck Concept

Room Type Campus “A” Primetime Util. Campus “B” Primetime Util.

Classrooms (2) 50% 50% Science Lab (1) 50% 10% Tech Auditorium (1) 50% 90% Average Util. 50% 50%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Key Parameters Used

  • Term used in Analysis:

– Fall 2014 (September 2 to December 20) – 15 full weeks

  • Campus used: Cabrillo College
  • Standard Week Definition:

– 8:00 am – 10:00 pm, Monday – Friday – Total Hours: 70

  • Prime Time Definition:

– 9:00 am – 2:00 pm, Monday – Thursday – Total Hours: 20

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Capacity Analysis

Strategy 1: Spread Class Offerings during the Primetime Week

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Identify your Bottlenecks in Primetime

Percent of Rooms in Use by Day and Time for Selected Room Type

Identify Primetime Identify Bottlenecks (>80% utilization) Report Parameters

Policy should

  • nly impact

Primetime and Bottlenecks

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Determine Primetime Utilization

Space Utilization by Room Type and Size with Primetime

Look for Room Type/Room Size Combination Bottlenecks Prime Ratio – Monitors spread balancing over week

Use Data to Create Spread Policy

  • Monitor with

Reporting

  • Prime Ratio
  • % of Offerings In/Out

Primetime

  • Prioritize Activities in

Optimization Bottleneck Level Report Parameters

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Capacity Analysis

Strategy 2: Reduce Empty Seats in Rooms by Scheduling Classes into Appropriately Sized Rooms

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Determine Seat Fill Utilization

Space Utilization by Room Type and Size with Seat Fill

Report Parameters Additional capacity exists where seat fill based on actual enrollment is low

Use Data to Create Seat Fill Policy

  • Enforce with Optimizer
  • Monitor with

Reporting

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Capacity Analysis

Opportunities

  • Consider use of underutilized rooms during primetime.

Although the Smart Classroom Room Type is the highest utilized, there are a number of Classroom room types at varying levels of utilization across the 70-hour standard week and the 20-hour primetime. Equitable scheduling across all Classrooms will help alleviate bottlenecks felt in specific high-demand rooms.

  • Improve seat fill. Even at bottlenecked times of day, many

Classroom room types have a significant percentage of seats left unfilled. Better matching of section capacities to actual enrollments will aid in scheduling appropriately- sized rooms to sections.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Course Offerings Analysis

Introduction

Key Concepts

  • On-Grid Meeting Patterns –

the standard grid of times to offer lecture-style courses

  • Enrollment Ratio – the ratio
  • f enrolled students to

seats offered in a given course Strategies

  • Strategy 3 – Minimize class
  • fferings that use non-

standard meeting patterns

  • Strategy 4 – Evenly utilize

prime hours by subject/department

  • Strategy 5 – Reduce the
  • ffering of unnecessary

sections

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Course Offerings Analysis

Strategy 3: Minimize Class Offerings that Use Non-Standard Meeting Patterns

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Scheduling “On Grid”

Meeting Patterns in Use

All Meeting Patterns in Use Sorted by Most Frequently Used

Use Data to Create Meeting Pattern Policy

  • Enforce with Optimizer
  • Monitor with Reporting

Top on-grid meeting patterns Conflicting (off- grid) patterns during primetime

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Course Offerings Analysis

Strategy 4: Evenly utilize prime hours by subject/department

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Identify Subjects with Greatest Primetime Preference

Prime Time Usage Ratio

All Subjects, sorted alphabetically % of sections scheduled during primetime

Use Data to Encourage Evenly- Spread Scheduling by Subject/Department

  • Enforce with Optimizer
  • Monitor with Reporting

Subject # Sections % Prime Subject # Sections % Prime SPED 12 100% PS 10 79% PHILO 16 98% GEOG 5 77% SOC 13 92% ECON 7 75% ADAPT 20 89% BUS 8 73% READ 5 84% KIN 96 72% JOURN 5 80% DMCP 27 69% ESL 4 79% PHYS 23 68%

Top Subjects offering 3+ sections with highest Prime Ratio In Classroom - Smart Rooms

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Course Offerings Analysis

Strategy 5: Reduce the Offering of Unnecessary Sections

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Determine Low Course Demand

Low Enrollment Course Analysis For Selected Term

Number of Sections Offered Total Empty Seats Across all Sections Shows enough Empty Seats to Cut one Section Identifies Courses with <10 Enrollment and <50% Enrollment Ratio

Review Trends Analyze action candidates for impact

  • n degree completion
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Potential Reduction Candidates

Low Enrollment Course Analysis For Selected Term

Course # # Secs Current Avg. Enroll

  • Avg. Max.

Enroll Excess Seats # Secs to Reduce

ADAPT 93 11 21.73 315 76 2 ANTHR 2 6 28.67 264 92 2 ART 80SB 8 0.75 65 59 7 ART 80SC 7 0.29 152 150 6 BIO 201 15 22.33 464 129 4 BIO 80SB 7 0.71 63 58 6 CG 51 19 23.68 615 165 5 CG 52 2 0.00 60 60 2 ENGL 100 19 24.68 551 82 2 ENGL 100L 25 15.60 671 281 10 ENGL 1A 26 24.77 754 110 3 ENGL 255 10 12.60 290 164 5 KIN 27A 9 16.33 385 238 5 KIN 27B 9 2.56 385 362 8 KIN 37B 7 4.43 280 249 6 KIN 50A 4 12.75 154 103 2

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Enrollment Ratio (enrollment fill) Report Parameters On-Grid Class? Offered in Primetime?

Use Data to Create Class Cancellation/Primetime Policy

  • Monitor with Reporting

Low Demand Sections

Low Enrollment Ratio Sections by Subject For Selected Term

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Low Demand Sections

Low Enrollment Ratio Sections by Subject For Selected Term

*Crosslist Enrollments and Max Enrollments were use where applicable

Course (Sec#) Act. Enroll Max. Enroll Enroll Ratio (%) Course (Sec#) Act. Enroll Max. Enroll Enroll Ratio (%) ACCT 151A (84375) 23 43 54% ART 51L (84498) 11 60 18% ACCT 151A (84379) 14 30 47% KIN 43B (85305) 5 32 45% ACCT 54A (86219) 10 43 23% KIN 43B (85306) 8 32 27% AP 9A (84454) 12 26 46% MATH 12 (85438) 21 36 58% ART 31A (84472) 6 25 24% MATH 12 (85442) 22 39 56% ART 31B (86593) 6 25 24% MATH 12 (85447) 21 39 54% ART 50L (84491) 143 250 57% SPED 210 (85832) 6 25 24% ART 50L (84492) 61 150 41% SPED 210 (85833) 5 25 20% ART 50L (84493) 29 100 29% SPED 210 (85834) 8 25 32% ART 50L (84495) 30 0% SPED 210 (85835) 13 25 52% ART 51L (84496) 10 200 5% TA 27 (85853) 3 30 10% ART 51L (84497) 16 100 16% TA 29 (85859) 5 30 17%

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Course Offerings Analysis

Opportunities

  • Reduce scheduling conflicts during primetime. Cabrillo

has numerous conflicting meeting patterns in Classroom room types during primetime, which impacts student and faculty scheduling conflicts, as well as room scheduling conflicts.

  • Revise enrollment capacities to better align with

expected enrollments, to aid in efficient scheduling to appropriately sized rooms.

  • Scrutinize undersubscribed courses. Focus on courses

with multiple section offerings and excess seat count greater than an entire section capacity to potentially reduce, and better align with student need.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Strategies to Evaluate

Capacity Bottleneck Strategies:

  • Optimize Rooms – enact the suggested scheduling

preferences as recommended by Ad Astra

  • Prime Ratio – maximize the use of rooms during primetime

hours, and throughout the scheduling week

Course Offering Efficiency Strategies:

  • Meeting Patterns – consistent meeting patterns support

ideal utilization of rooms, and minimize faculty and student conflicts

  • Evaluate Reduction Candidates for degree requirement

impact

  • Select Reduction and Elimination Candidates to remove or

rotate out of the schedule

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Action Plan

What We’ve Done

  • Installed and Configured

Astra Schedule 7.5

  • Reviewed Strategic

Scheduling Summary

  • Consolidated the various

“Smart Room” Room Types into one Room Type

  • Started using Astra

Schedule 7.5 for scheduling Events Next Steps

  • 6 month goals

– Utilize optimizer to place sections with space “turned-

  • ff”
  • 1 year goals

– Continued Enrollment Growth

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Solutions that Fit

Professional Services Strategic Checkup

  • Capacity Analysis
  • Course Offerings Analysis
  • Performance in Key Areas
  • Academic Scheduling Policy

Recommendations

Platinum Analytics

Course Need Analysis

  • Historical Trend Analysis
  • Student Specific Degree

Program Analysis

  • Student Course Planner*

Astra Schedule

  • Academic Scheduling and

Optimization

  • Event Management
  • Resource Management

Workflow

  • Analysis and Utilization Reporting
  • Enterprise Calendaring

Capacity and Financial Modeling Schedule Development Consulting Policy Development and Enforcement Advanced Product Use Schedule Development Sandbox

Simulated Registration Timetabling Faculty Modeling*