strategic project management
play

Strategic Project Management - Away from PBO By Default Shadow P D - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Strategic Project Management - Away from PBO By Default Shadow P D Rwelamila Professor of Project Management & Procurement Systems Graduate School of Business Leadership University of South Africa (UNISA) South Africa 0 What to Cover


  1. Strategic Project Management - Away from PBO By Default Shadow P D Rwelamila Professor of Project Management & Procurement Systems Graduate School of Business Leadership University of South Africa (UNISA) South Africa 0

  2. What to Cover Context – PM for Contemporary Organizations Context – Forewords (4# ) Context – Executives/ Foot soldiers What is a PBO & Challenges in Practice? Visiting the Project Coal-face Linkage Between Projects & Strategy – Prac tical dilemmas Project Management Maturity – How mature is your organization? I nternal Re-engineering - Strategic PM in action

  3. 7 Primary Forces of Change Facing Contemporary Organisations Compression of product life cycle Global competition Knowledge explosion Corporate downsizing Increased customer/client focus Rapid development of non industrialised countries & closed economies Small projects represent big problems

  4. PRIMARY FORCES FACING CONTEMPORARY ORGANISATIONS Compression of the product/ service life cycle: computer aided design (CAD) & manufacturing (CAM), have forced radical changes in the product life cycle & clients are more demanding for improved services . Global competition: transformation from national or regional economies to one global economy during the 1970s , has brought pressures on quality improvement and cost containment

  5. PRIMARY FORCES (Contd.) Knowledge explosion the growth in new knowledge has increased the complexity of projects because projects encompass the latest advances & services are also more technologically complex . it is hard to find a new product that does not contain at least one microchip • the need to integrate divergent technologies (through PM)

  6. PRIMARY FORCES (Contd.) Corporate downsizing after years of stressing growth and ‘big is better’ , organisations have begun to face the harsh reality that big is also costly downsizing (or rightsizing if you are still employed) and sticking to core competencies have become necessary for survival of firms. Middle management is a mere skeleton of the past - PM is replacing middle management it is rare today to find any major project performed totally in-house - outsourcing, where the PMs have to manage their own people but also their counterparts in different organisations

  7. PRIMARY FORCES (Contd.) I ncreased Customer focus the majority of customers no longer simply settle for generic products/ or services . They want customized products/ services that cater for their needs the customized environment requires a much closer working relationship between provider & receiver • PM is critical both to development of customized products and services and to sustaining lucrative relationships with customers

  8. PRIMARY FORCES (Contd.) Rapid development of Developing Countries & Closed Economies the collapse of the Soviet Union, Apartheid, etc., and the gradual opening of Asian communist countries, SADC and other African countries have created an explosion in pent-up demand for consumer goods & infrastructure development there is scramble to introduce new products and services to these new markets & many firms are using PM techniques to establish distribution channels & foreign bases of operations

  9. PRIMARY FORCES (Contd.) Small projects represent big problems the velocity of change required to remain competitive or simply keep up has created an organisational climate in which hundreds of projects are implemented concurrently - the climate has created a multi-project environment and a plethora of new problems.

  10. THE FORCES ARE REAL! PM is ideally suited for a business environment requiring accountability, flexibility, innovation, speed, and continuous improvement .

  11. THE IMPACT OF THE 7 FORCES it is no longer possible to to use traditional management methods to solve problems (individuals solving problems!!) - the need to use teams to solve problems (combined skill?) organisational response to the forces cannot take the form of an instantaneous transformation from the old to the new

  12. Forewords (1) “We found that too many leaders and managers, particularly at the upper and senior levels, were inclined to view project management as a special case management – a minor departure from the proper or expected ways of managing the organizations. Too often, these managers failed to appreciate the strategic role that projects can play in the management of their organizations. Up until the last few years, many managers tended to tolerate rather than fully accept project as the way to enhance organizational effectiveness. This caused PMs, functional managers, and project professionals to see themselves in ambiguous roles in supporting project initiatives .” : Cleland & I reland (2007)

  13. Forewords (2) “Aligning the organization’s portfolio of projects to maximize their contributions to strategic objectives takes a highly coordinated effort. It requires more than the old "grenade over the wall" approach, in which the planning staff identifies and characterizes the project and then tosses it to an uninformed and uninvolved project management group that is supposed to complete the project. - everyone must be engaged with the project before charging ahead.” - Dinsmore & Rocha (2012) 12

  14. Forewords (3) “PM is no longer about the sequence of steps required to complete the project in time. It is about systematically incorporating the voice of the customer/or client ( my emphasis ), creating a disciplined way of prioritizing effort and resolving trade-offs, working concurrently on all aspects projects in multifunctional teams, and much more. ……….- in this case 80% of the costs are determined before they take over.” : Jones (2003): Lean Enterprise Research Centre, Cardiff Business School, UK

  15. Forewords (4) “There are huge opportunities for eliminating wasted time and effort in almost every project . In manufacturing, Toyota estimate that only 5% of activities actually add value, 35% are necessary but do not add value, whilst the remaining 60% is pure waste – ‘muda’ in Japanese! By halving the effort in designing a new car, they show this ‘muda’ can be reduced by good project management. Every PM…has not only to manage their own project but seek ways of eliminating the ‘muda’ in their systems so they can do more for less, and more quickly next time!” : Jones (2003): Lean Enterprise Research Centre, Cardiff Business School, UK

  16. Strategic Project Management Executive Management Interface between Project Link and Clients (internally and externally) and the focus to continuously ensuring appropriate and optimised solutions Upstream Upstream [Strategic emphasis; Core team & organisation; PMIS; Developing a PM; Becoming a learning organisation; Inter-organisational relations] ProjectLink in the midst of the Upstream and Downstream of Project Management Development Downstream Tactical Project Management Downstream The Project Manager and his/her Team’s Interface with stakeholders applying Project Management Best Practices Technical + Social Cultural Project PM The Project Manager and his/her Team’s Integration and Optimisation of the Required Project Resources (Technical) + Management (Social-cultural Issues)

  17. Do You Know Who You Are? A Project Based Organization (PBO) : Characteristics (1)  management by projects must be an organisational strategy;  adoption of temporary organisations for the performance of complex processes;  it must manage a portfolio of different project types;  it must have specific permanent organisations to provide integrative functions; 16

  18. Do You Know Who You Are? A Project Based Organization (PBO) : Characteristics (2)  it must apply a ‘new management paradigm’ (lean management, total quality management (TQM), business process re-engineering and learning organisation);  it must have an explicit project management culture; and  it must perceive itself to be project oriented. 17

  19. Default Project Based Organizations  Project unlinked to coherent strategies  Upper managers are unaware of the total number & scope of projects being undertaken  Lip service to learning from projects (audits & close-out reports out of the equation)  Window dressing project management information systems  The core-team is very weak and chaotic PROJECT BASED ORGS. BY DEFAULT AS A NORM

  20. Project Management A Cinderella Field?  8 out of 10 project managers are accidental or have inadequate PM knowledge base  Most organizations are fundamentally project based, are PBO by default – characterized by archaic & fragmented systems  Project management training is characterized by curricula falling short a significant number of project management fundamentals PROJECT MANAGEMENT POSTURING SEEMS TO DOMINATE

  21. Accidental Project Managers – custodians  Individuals are appointed as PMs because they have qualifications in the same field as the project’s core business  Player and referee roles – a conflict recipe  Perpetual competence challenges  Understanding the social coalition dynamics (Overflowing IQ or Overflowing EQ or Balance IQ/EQ?) THE GROWING SYNDROME WITH ENTRENCHED DYNAMICS

  22. Project Management -Context & Concepts From a Linear Model to a Complex 3- Dimensional Maze –environment Features of a Project

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend