Stereotyping? Evidence from Reactions to Police Deaths Heather - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

stereotyping evidence from reactions to police deaths
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Stereotyping? Evidence from Reactions to Police Deaths Heather - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Stereotyping? Evidence from Reactions to Police Deaths Heather Sarsons November 9, 2015 Idea Broad question: Do the actions of one person lead people to update their beliefs about an entire group? Does it depend on what the context or action?


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Stereotyping? Evidence from Reactions to Police Deaths

Heather Sarsons November 9, 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Idea

Broad question: Do the actions of one person lead people to update their beliefs about an entire group? Does it depend on what the context or action? Examples:

◮ woman performs well on a math exam → “she is very good” ◮ woman performs poorly on a math exam → “women are bad at math” ◮ white person carries out a shooting → “he is disturbed” ◮ black person carries out a shooting → “they are violent”

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Idea

Broad question: Do the actions of one person lead people to update their beliefs about an entire group? Does it depend on what the context or action? Examples:

◮ woman performs well on a math exam → “she is very good” ◮ woman performs poorly on a math exam → “women are bad at math” ◮ white person carries out a shooting → “he is disturbed” ◮ black person carries out a shooting → “they are violent”

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Idea

Broad question: Do the actions of one person lead people to update their beliefs about an entire group? Does it depend on what the context or action? Examples:

◮ woman performs well on a math exam → “she is very good” ◮ woman performs poorly on a math exam → “women are bad at math” ◮ white person carries out a shooting → “he is disturbed” ◮ black person carries out a shooting → “they are violent”

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Idea

Broad question: Do the actions of one person lead people to update their beliefs about an entire group? Does it depend on what the context or action? Stereotyping: overreacting to information that confirms your prior, underreacting to information that goes against it Bordalo, Coffman, Gennaioli, and Shleifer: “Stereotypes” (forthcoming)

◮ people recall only the most representative types from a group ◮ results in modified probability distributions over types

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Stereotyping

Narrow question: Do police officers react differently when a minority commits a crime compared to when a white person commits a crime? look at assaults on police officers

◮ if assaulter is black, confirms stereotype that minorities are criminals ◮ if assaulter is white, goes against belief that whites are not criminals

how does the behaviour of officers change after an assault?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Stereotyping

Narrow question: Do police officers react differently when a minority commits a crime compared to when a white person commits a crime? look at assaults on police officers

◮ if assaulter is black, confirms stereotype that minorities are criminals ◮ if assaulter is white, goes against belief that whites are not criminals

how does the behaviour of officers change after an assault?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Stereotyping

Narrow question: Do police officers react differently when a minority commits a crime compared to when a white person commits a crime? look at assaults on police officers

◮ if assaulter is black, confirms stereotype that minorities are criminals ◮ if assaulter is white, goes against belief that whites are not criminals

how does the behaviour of officers change after an assault?

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Outline

1 Context and Data 2 Empirical Strategy and Predictions of Stereotyping Model 3 Basic Results 4 Alternative Explanations

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Context and Data

NYPD Stop, Question, and Frisk data (2004 - 2014)

◮ Daily data: all stops in NYC ◮ Demographic info. of civilians stopped ◮ Reason for stop, frisk, and search ◮ Arrests ◮ Use of force ◮ Civilian’s reaction ◮ Weapon or illegal substances found

Police officer deaths

◮ “NYPD Fallen Heros” + internet search

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Context and Data

NYPD Stop, Question, and Frisk data (2004 - 2014)

◮ Daily data: all stops in NYC ◮ Demographic info. of civilians stopped ◮ Reason for stop, frisk, and search ◮ Arrests ◮ Use of force ◮ Civilian’s reaction ◮ Weapon or illegal substances found

Police officer deaths

◮ “NYPD Fallen Heros” + internet search

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Context and Data

NYPD Stop, Question, and Frisk data (2004 - 2014)

◮ Daily data: all stops in NYC ◮ Demographic info. of civilians stopped ◮ Reason for stop, frisk, and search ◮ Arrests ◮ Use of force ◮ Civilian’s reaction ◮ Weapon or illegal substances found

Police officer deaths

◮ “NYPD Fallen Heros” + internet search

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Summary Statistics

Table : NYPD Stop and Frisk Data

Mean

  • Std. Dev.

Frisked 0.54 0.50 Searched 0.08 0.28 Arrested 0.06 0.23 Force Used 0.22 0.42 Contraband Found 0.02 0.13 Weapon Found 0.01 0.10 Black 0.85 0.36 Black and frisked 0.47 0.50 Observations 2,737,853

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Summary Statistics

Police officer deaths 17 events 5 committed by white people 12 committed by black or black Hispanic people

  • ccurred in 11 precincts
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Summary Statistics

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Time Trends

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Time Trends

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Time Trends

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Officers’ reactions to assaults

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Officers’ reactions to assaults

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Officer reactions to assault

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Officer reactions to assault

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Stereotyping

Predictions

1 Frisks should increase more for blacks if assaulter is black as

information is in line with stereotype

2 Small or no effect if assaulter is white as information goes against

stereotype

3 No cross effect: no increase in frisks on black civilians if shooter is

white and vice versa

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Stereotyping

Predictions

1 Frisks should increase more for blacks if assaulter is black as

information is in line with stereotype

2 Small or no effect if assaulter is white as information goes against

stereotype

3 No cross effect: no increase in frisks on black civilians if shooter is

white and vice versa

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Stereotyping

Predictions

1 Frisks should increase more for blacks if assaulter is black as

information is in line with stereotype

2 Small or no effect if assaulter is white as information goes against

stereotype

3 No cross effect: no increase in frisks on black civilians if shooter is

white and vice versa

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Stereotyping

Predictions

1 Frisks should increase more for blacks if assaulter is black as

information is in line with stereotype

2 Small or no effect if assaulter is white as information goes against

stereotype

3 No cross effect: no increase in frisks on black civilians if shooter is

white and vice versa

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Effect by citizen race

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Effect by citizen race and shooter race

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Effect by citizen race and shooter race

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Alternative explanations

Retaliation Cracking down on crime

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Retaliation

Officers retaliate against community to “teach them a lesson” Predictions:

◮ retaliation occurs in precinct regardless of assaulter’s race

Empirically:

◮ police officers only retaliate against minorities ◮ suggests that crime by white person is viewed differently from crime by

minority

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Retaliation

Officers retaliate against community to “teach them a lesson” Predictions:

◮ retaliation occurs in precinct regardless of assaulter’s race

Empirically:

◮ police officers only retaliate against minorities ◮ suggests that crime by white person is viewed differently from crime by

minority

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Retaliation

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Cracking down on crime

Shootings occur in high-crime areas and police are responding to increase in crime Predictions:

◮ should see same reaction from police when: ⋆ predominantly black, high-crime neighbourhood ⋆ predominantly white, high-crime neighbourhood ◮ if all shootings occur in predominantly black, high crime areas,

consistent with increase in frisks against blacks

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Crime rates

Control for crime rates and other precinct-specific traits:

friskp,t =

10

k=−4

βkdeathp,t−k +

10

k=−4

γk

  • deathp,t−k ×CRp,t−k
  • +δCRp,y(t) +θp +εpt

where: deathp,t−k indicates that a death occurred k weeks in the past CRp,y(t) is z-score of crime rate in precinct p in year y(t) θp is a precinct fixed effect

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Plotting γ

friskp,t =

10

k=−4

βkdeathp,t−k +

10

k=−4

γk

  • deathp,t−k ×CRp,t−k
  • +δCRp,y(t) +θp +εpt
slide-37
SLIDE 37

Plotting γ, split by shooter race

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Plotting γ, split by shooter race

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Cracking down on crime: found a weapon

fndwpnp,t =

10

k=−4

βkdeathp,t−k +

10

k=−4

γk

  • deathp,t−k ×CRp,t−k
  • +δCRp,y(t) +θp +εpt
slide-40
SLIDE 40

Cracking down on crime: found contraband

fndcontrap,t =

10

k=−4

βkdeathp,t−k +

10

k=−4

γk

  • deathp,t−k ×CRp,t−k
  • +δCRp,y(t) +θp +εpt
slide-41
SLIDE 41

Summary of results

stops, frisks, and use of force increase when a black person assaults an officer but not when a white person assaults an officer interacts with crime level in precinct for blacks but not for whites not Bayesian updating: no increase in weapons or contraband found but frisks remain high for 8-10 weeks might be retaliation, but differential retaliation updating with biased priors vs. biased processing of information

◮ if starting from biased priors, would see some sign of updating after

shootings

Placebo Test

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Future plans...

ideally: two assaults occurs in same precinct; one white offender, one black offender

Similar Precinct

  • ther settings

trust game in the lab

slide-43
SLIDE 43
slide-44
SLIDE 44

Future Plans

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Placebo Test

Summary