Steele St Multimodal Safety Project July 10th, th, 2019 HOW? - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

steele st
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Steele St Multimodal Safety Project July 10th, th, 2019 HOW? - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Steele St Multimodal Safety Project July 10th, th, 2019 HOW? Provide roadway space for all WHY? SAFETY Trend is going up in 2019 Streets need to be designed to be safer Project Background Corridor in Context Corridor provides


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Steele St

Multimodal Safety Project

July 10th, th, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3

HOW? Provide roadway

space for all

slide-4
SLIDE 4

WHY? SAFETY

Trend is going up in 2019 – Streets need to be designed to be safer

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Project Background

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Corridor in Context

  • Corridor provides regional connection
  • Steele St is inherently high-comfort
  • Intersections of E Alameda Ave and E Exposition

represent challenging crossings

  • History of crashes/speeding on Alameda

S University Blvd (5-lanes) S Colorado Blvd (8-lanes) ~1-MILE

slide-7
SLIDE 7

STRAVA METRO DATA

slide-8
SLIDE 8

More than a Decade in the Making

Late 2000s

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Why? Community Priority

CCD Uncontrolled Ped Crossing Guidelines requires 20 bikes/peds per hour threshold to be met for consideration of a marked crossing; Steele St and Alameda Ave recorded 37 bicyclists and pedestrians in the peak hour; Steele St and E Exposition Ave recorded 31 bicyclist and pedestrians in the peak hour

slide-10
SLIDE 10

High Demand Crossings

Date of counts: *04/06/19 **03/23/19

* **

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Ped/Bike Crashes:

2 1 1 1 Bicycle/Vehicle Crashes Pedestrian/Vehicle Crash

Crash Data: 2013 - 2018

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Steele and Alameda

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Complex vs Simple Intersections

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Steele and Alameda

Existing Intersection Issues

  • No marked crosswalk
  • Long crossing distances
  • Poor intersection design
  • Poor site lines
  • Fast turning vehicles
  • History of crashes/speeding
slide-15
SLIDE 15

72’ 73’ 63’ 76’ Long Crossing Distances

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Angled curb ramps lead into intersection

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Poor site lines – due to setback stop bars Stop Bar Stop Bar

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Large Turn Radius ~80’ @ 20mph

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Unpredictable turning movements

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Unpredictable turning movements

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Assessed Traffic Operations/Crashes

CCD/DPD Crash Database 2013-2018

5 Crashes @ Intersection

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Speed Kills

The speed limit on Alameda Dr is 25 mph, but the majority of drivers westbound travel faster than 30 mph. If a pedestrian is struck by a car travelling that speed, they have 40% chance

  • f dying or having a life-

altering serious injury.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

2017 Bicyclist Crash

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Driver Quote: "THE SUN WAS IN MY EYES AND I COULDN'T SEE, I SAW A

CAR COMING AND I TRIED TO BEAT IT, I TURNED AND I TOOK IT REALLY

  • SHALLOW. BY THE TIME I SAW THE BIKE IT WAS TWO FEET IN FRONT OF ME.”

“THE SUN WAS IN MY EYES AND I COULDN'T SEE”

  • Design Solution – place queuing bicyclists and pedestrians in protected area

“I SAW A CAR COMING AND I TRIED TO BEAT IT, I TURNED AND I TOOK IT REALLY SHALLOW.”

  • Design Solution – articulate turning movement so “taking it really shallow”

and trying to “beat [on-coming vehicles]” is not a viable turning movement “BY THE TIME I SAW THE BIKE IT WAS TWO FEET IN FRONT OF ME.”

  • Design Solution – mark crosswalk to increase motorist awareness of crossing

bicyclists and pedestrians

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Goals for Design

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Concept Designs

Centralized Crossing Diverter

Presented April/May 2019

slide-27
SLIDE 27

What we heard:

DO:

  • Provide a safe crossing for

pedestrians and bicyclists

  • Make turning movements at

intersection more predictable DON’T:

  • Restrict turning movements
  • Impact the center turn lane in front of

the Polo Club Condos

  • Impact loading operations in front of

the Polo Club Condos

  • Increase congestion
  • Impede emergency vehicle movements
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Pr Pref eferr erred ed Des esign ign

Parking increased from 13 to 21 spaces

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Strong

  • nger

er Connection ection to Cher erry y Cree eek Trai ail

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Steele and Exposition

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Steele and Exposition

Existing Intersection Issues

  • No marked crosswalk
  • Poor intersection design
  • Poor site lines
  • History of crashes/speeding
slide-32
SLIDE 32

High Demand Crossings

Date of counts: *04/06/19 **03/23/19

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Assessed Traffic Operations/Crashes

CCD/DPD Crash Database

7 Crashes @ Intersection

  • 1 Bike / 1 Pedestrian

Crashes

Weekday Average Traffic: 6,049 Vehicle Speed > 30mph WB: 57 %

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Goals for Design

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Preferred Concept

Centerline Hardening

Steel and Exposition

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Next Steps

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Longer Term Next Steps

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Questions?