Steel City High-Rise Pittsburgh, PA Analysis 1: Ashley N. Bistline Steel Fabrication Efficiency Analysis 2: Construction Option Unique Structural Members Breadths: Structural and Mechanical Advisor: Somayeh Asadi Analysis 3: Collocation in the Construction Industry Analysis 4: Vertical MEP Acceleration
Steel City High-Rise Project Background Presentation Outline Statistics and Team Size: 440,000 SF, 18 stories Building Height: 220 LF Project Delivery: GMP with CM at Risk Cost: Occupancy Breakdown Offices Overall Project: $100,000,000 Hotel Construction: $67,000,000 Parking Garage Construction Dates: Retail 1/13/14 – 12/10/15
Steel City High-Rise Background Analysis 1: Steel Fabrication/Efficiency Presentation Outline Problem and Goals Project Background Analysis 1 // Steel Fabrication Efficiency Background Fabrication Drivers Structural Breadth Mechanical Breadth Analysis 3 // Collocation in the Construction Industry Analysis 4 // Vertical MEP Acceleration Conclusions and Recommendations Acknowledgments
Steel City High-Rise Fabrication Drivers Analysis 1: Steel Fabrication/Efficiency Presentation Outline Fabricator Expertise Project Background Analysis 1 // Steel Fabrication Efficiency Background Fabrication Drivers Structural Breadth Mechanical Breadth Analysis 3 // Collocation in the Construction Industry Analysis 4 // Vertical MEP Acceleration Conclusions and Recommendations Acknowledgments
Steel City High-Rise Fabrication Drivers Analysis 1: Steel Fabrication/Efficiency Presentation Outline Sequencing and Erection Project Background Analysis 1 // Steel Fabrication Efficiency Background Fabrication Drivers Structural Breadth Mechanical Breadth Analysis 3 // Collocation in the Construction Industry Analysis 4 // Vertical MEP Acceleration Conclusions and Recommendations Acknowledgments
Steel City High-Rise Structural Breadth Analysis 1 and 2: Fabrication/Unique Structure Presentation Outline Uniqueness vs Uniformity Project Background Analysis 1 // Steel Fabrication Efficiency Background Fabrication Drivers Structural Breadth Mechanical Breadth Analysis 3 // Collocation in the Construction Industry Steel Analysis 4 // Vertical MEP Acceleration Amount Unit 3,300.00 Pieces Conclusions and Recommendations 2,880.00 Tons Acknowledgments
Steel City High-Rise Structural Breadth Analysis 1 and 2: Fabrication/Unique Structure Presentation Outline Old Floor System Structural Integrity Checks Item Weight (lbs) Deck (2VLI20) 55 Concrete (LW 3.25") 10,376 Beams (2 - W16x26) 5,702 Project Background Pool Water 74,358 Analysis 1 // Steel Fabrication Efficiency Pool Bowl 93,938 Background Total 184,429 Fabrication Drivers Structural Breadth New Floor System Mechanical Breadth Item Weight (lbs) Analysis 3 // Collocation in the Deck (2VLI20) 1,408 Construction Industry Concrete (LW 3.25") 22,267 Analysis 4 // Vertical MEP Acceleration Beams (2 - W16x26) 1,575 Conclusions and Recommendations Total 25,250 Acknowledgments
Steel City High-Rise Mechanical Breadth Analysis 1 and 2: Fabrication/Unique Structure Presentation Outline Air Handling Reconfiguration Project Background Analysis 1 // Steel Fabrication Efficiency Unit Comparison Background Component RTU-5 RTU-6 New AHU Cooling Performance Fabrication Drivers AirFlow (CFM) 4000 3600 5000 Structural Breadth Refrigerant Type R-41 R-41 R-41 Tonnage 10 7.5 13 Mechanical Breadth Capacity (MBH) 123.4 93.1 154.3 Analysis 3 // Collocation in the Supply Air Blower Performance RTU Package Includes: Motor Rating (HP) 3 3 5 Construction Industry • Condenser/Refrigerant Cooling Static Pressure 1.44 0.92 2.6 • Gas Heating Analysis 4 // Vertical MEP Acceleration Drive Type Belt Belt Belt • 3 HP Total Unit Conclusions and Recommendations Weight (lbs) 1205 1005 2393 Acknowledgments
Steel City High-Rise Mechanical Breadth Analysis 1 and 2: Fabrication/Unique Structure Presentation Outline Air Handling Reconfiguration Cost Comparison Item Weight (lbs) 3 HP (2 units) $ 3,878.94 5 HP (1 unit) $ 3,232.45 Old RTU $ 11,300.00 New AHU and Condenser $ 13,500.00 Project Background Analysis 1 // Steel Fabrication Efficiency • Rooftop vs Indoor AHU Background Fabrication Drivers • 2 Units vs 1 Unit Structural Breadth Mechanical Breadth Operational Costs Analysis 3 // Collocation in the Unit $/year Construction Industry Old $ 3,878.94 New $ 3,232.45 Analysis 4 // Vertical MEP Acceleration Savings $ 646.49 Conclusions and Recommendations Acknowledgments
Steel City High-Rise Collocation in Construction Analysis 3: Collocation in the Construction Industry Presentation Outline Collocation at Steel City Project Background Analysis 1 // Steel Fabrication Efficiency Analysis 3 // Collocation in the Construction Industry At Steel City High-Rise Participant Diversity Best Applications Who Should Participate Conclusions Analysis 4 // Vertical MEP Acceleration Conclusions and Recommendations Acknowledgments
Steel City High-Rise Participant Diversity Analysis 3: Collocation in the Construction Industry Presentation Outline Participant Experience: 83% • 3% : < 1 Year Collocated Projects have worked • 3%: 1-3 Years Project Background on a collocated Analysis 1 // Steel Fabrication Efficiency project before • 6%: 3-5 Years 97% Analysis 3 // Collocation in the Construction Industry At Steel City High-Rise • 18%: 5-10 Years say that Participant Diversity • 25%: 10-15 Years working in a Best Applications collocated space • 9%: 15-20 Years Who Should Participate was a positive Conclusions • 36%: 20+ Years Analysis 4 // Vertical MEP Acceleration experience Conclusions and Recommendations Acknowledgments
Steel City High-Rise Best Applications Analysis 3: Collocation in the Construction Industry Presentation Outline Collocated Projects Project Background Analysis 1 // Steel Fabrication Efficiency Analysis 3 // Collocation in the Construction Industry At Steel City High-Rise Participant Diversity Best Applications Who Should Participate Conclusions Analysis 4 // Vertical MEP Acceleration Conclusions and Recommendations Acknowledgments
Steel City High-Rise Who Should Participate? Analysis 3: Collocation in the Construction Industry Presentation Outline Choosing Partakers Project Background 94% Analysis 1 // Steel Fabrication Efficiency say that Analysis 3 // Collocation in the Construction Industry productivity At Steel City High-Rise and reliability Participant Diversity increase with Best Applications 71% collocation Who Should Participate Consider: say that value Conclusions Risk Duration Analysis 4 // Vertical MEP Acceleration is lost without full Package Value Conclusions and Recommendations cooperation Complexity Acknowledgments
Steel City High-Rise Schedule Comparison Analysis 4: Vertical MEP Presentation Outline Accelerated Roof: Schedule Rework Project Background Analysis 1 // Steel Fabrication Efficiency Analysis 3 // Collocation in the Construction Industry Analysis 4 // Vertical MEP Acceleration Original Roof: Schedule Comparison Comparison Savings Original Rework Finish Date 10/16/2015 9/4/2015 Conclusions and Recommendations Duration 21 mos 20 mos Acknowledgments Does not impact: crew, durations, or equipment during construction
Steel City High-Rise Savings Analysis 4: Vertical MEP Presentation Outline Schedule and Cost Impact Comparison Original Rework Finish Date 10/16/2015 9/4/2015 Project Background Duration 21 mos 20 mos Analysis 1 // Steel Fabrication Efficiency Analysis 3 // Collocation in the Construction Industry Acceleration Produces: 1 mos 3 mos Analysis 4 // Vertical MEP Acceleration General Conditions $ 173,155 $ 519,465 Schedule Comparison Revenue $ 167,000 $ 500,000 Savings Total Savings $ 340,155 $ 1,019,465 Conclusions and Recommendations Acknowledgments
Steel City High-Rise Conclusions and Recommendations Ashley N. Bistline // Construction Management Presentation Outline [[ Analyses 1 & 2 ]] Steel Fabrication/Breadths Recommend More efficient units, prevents short cycling, extends life of units Project Background [[ Analysis 3 ]] Collocation in Construction Recommend Analysis 1 // Steel Fabrication Efficiency Prevents issues/swift conflict resolution, improves Analysis 3 // Collocation in the Construction Industry communication, establishing long-term relationships, increases innovation Analysis 4 // Vertical MEP Acceleration Conclusions and Recommendations Recommend [[ Analysis 4 ]] Vertical MEP Acceleration Acknowledgments Can save the project schedule an additional month and save between $340,000 and $1,020,000.
Steel City High-Rise Acknowledgments Ashley N. Bistline // Construction Management Presentation Outline Academic: Industry/Professional: Special Thanks to: Dr. Somayeh Asadi Turner Construction Company PACE Industry Members Dr. Rob Leicht Millcraft Investments Family and Friends Professor Parfitt Amthor Steel God Dr. Charles Cox Johnson Controls AE Power Players Professor Jim Faust OPP 2015 Captains Penn State Architectural Engineering Faculty AE Class 2015
Steel City High-Rise Ashley N. Bistline // Construction Management Presentation Outline Questions?
Recommend
More recommend
