STATUS REPORT OF GHANAS PDIA TEAM CABRI/ Building State Capacity - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

status report of ghana s pdia team
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

STATUS REPORT OF GHANAS PDIA TEAM CABRI/ Building State Capacity - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

STATUS REPORT OF GHANAS PDIA TEAM CABRI/ Building State Capacity Closing Workshop on PFM in Africa South Africa 11 th December, 2017 1 INTRODUCTION The TEAM is passionate about learning a new approach to solving complex problems:


slide-1
SLIDE 1

STATUS REPORT OF GHANA’S PDIA TEAM

1

CABRI/ Building State Capacity Closing Workshop on PFM in Africa

South Africa 11th December, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

INTRODUCTION

2

➢The TEAM is passionate about learning a new approach to solving complex problems: ➢TEAM MEMBERS:

  • 1. SEIDU DAWDI ADAMS
  • 2. ALEXANDER NKANSAH
  • 3. THELMA DANGBEY-KUBI
  • 4. PETER AIDOO
  • 5. GEORGE OFORI-ATTA
  • 6. ERIC YARTEY

➢TEAM COACH:

PETER JOHN JONATH (CABRI SEC.)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

GHANA TEAM AND COACH

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

AGENDA

4

  • Introduction;
  • Problem Statement;
  • Status of work;
  • Entry Points and outputs
  • Authorizer’s role
  • Challenges, Lessons
  • Recommendations and Next Steps
slide-5
SLIDE 5

President’s quote

5

  • “We can no longer continue to make

policies for ourselves, in our country, in our region, in our continent on the basis

  • f

whatever support the western world or France or the European Union can give us. It will not work, it has not worked and it will not work. Our responsibility is to charter a path which is about how we can develop our nations our selves”

slide-6
SLIDE 6

PROBLEM STATEMENT

6

“Insufficient discretionary Fiscal Space associated with Non- Lodgment in Gross of Retained NTR/IGF Receipts”

slide-7
SLIDE 7

FISHBONE ANALYSIS

7

Insufficient Fiscal Space Associated with Non-Lodgement in Gross of Retained NTR/IGF Delays in release of allocation Weak revenue forecast Unrealistic Assumptions Inadequate Data Unanticipated Expenditures Inadequate cash flow Non compliance to Legal provision Inadequate incentive to comply Non application of sanctions Weak monitoring Not seen as a priority Inadequate Resources Recommendation

Of Monitoring Reports Not implemented Non-enforcement

  • f

sanctions Weak internal Controls Non enforcement Of sanctions lack

  • f sanctions

Non adherence to procedures

slide-8
SLIDE 8

FISHBONE ANALYSIS

8

DELAYS IN THE RELEASE OF ALLOC Inadequate cash flow Weak revenue forecast Unrealistic assumptions Unanticipated expenditures Inadequate data Scattered data across MoF and MDAs Non sharing of data Lack of common data sharing platform Fear of loosing relevance and control Fear of not getting additional remuneration

NON COMPLIANCE WITH LEGAL PROVISION Inadequate incentives to comply Non application of sanctions Lack of clarity of legal provisions to MDAs Fusion of roles WEAK MONITORING Inadequate resource allocation Not seen as a priority Monitoring recommendations not implemented Lack of incentive to implement recommendation Non enforcement of sanctions Cronyism and nepotism

WEAK INTERNAL CONTROL MECHANISM

  • Non adherence to procedures
  • Lack of incentives to adhere to

Procedure

  • Non application of sanctions
  • Fusion of roles

Insufficient discretionary fiscal space associated with Non – Lodgment in gross of Retained NTR/IGF receipts

slide-9
SLIDE 9

ENTRY POINT ANALYSIS - DELAYS IN THE RELEASE OF ALLOC.

Inadequate cash flow Weak revenue forecast Unrealistic assumptions Unanticipated external shock Unplanned expenditures Inadequate data Scattered data across MoF and MDAs Non sharing of data

Fear of loosing relevance and control Fear of not getting additional remuneration Lack of common data sharing platform

Authority Acceptance Ability

slide-10
SLIDE 10

BASIS FOR ENTRY POINT - LACK OF COMMON DATA SHARING PLATFORM

10

AUTHORITY

  • Minister’s quest to

improve fiscal projections and budget credibility;

  • Minister will approve

ABILITY

  • Available data and

systems;

  • Enough resources to

improve existing systems to accommodate platform;

  • Existing capacity to

build and manage data and systems; ACCEPTANCE

  • Numerous

stakeholders with varying interest;

  • Willingness to accept

and own process will be challenged;

  • We need data

gathering, story lines and engagement with stakeholders to build acceptance

slide-11
SLIDE 11

ENTRY POINT ANALYSIS – WEAK MONITORING

Inadequate resource allocation Not seen as a priority Monitoring recommendations not implemented Lack of incentive to implement recommendation Non enforcement of sanctions Cronyism and nepotism

Authority Acceptance Ability

slide-12
SLIDE 12

BASIS FOR ENTRY POINT – NON ENFORCEMENT OF SANCTIONS

12

AUTHORITY

  • The financial

laws mandate the Minister to sanction

  • Quest to

enforce fiscal discipline by

  • Hon. Minister

ABILITY

  • Structures in

place

  • Mandate of the
  • Hon. Minister

provided under the PFM law ACCEPTANCE

  • There is

growing concern amongst the citizenry and leadership that we need to enforce our laws

slide-13
SLIDE 13

ENTRY POINT ANALYSIS – NON COMPLIANCE WITH LEGAL PROVISION

Inadequate incentives to comply Non application of sanctions Lack of clarity of legal provisions to MDAs Fusion of roles

Authority Acceptance Ability

slide-14
SLIDE 14

BASIS FOR ENTRY POINT – LACK OF CLARITY OF LEGAL PROVISIONS

TO MDAs

14

AUTHORITY

  • Minister’s quest to

increase discretionary fiscal space;

  • Minister will approve

ABILITY

  • Capacity to train

and/or sensitize relevant stakeholders;

  • Availability of

platforms within the budget preparation process to undertake the activities

  • Enough resources to

undertake the exercise; ACCEPTANCE

  • Stakeholders will

gladly accept as they may not have to commit resources to

  • rient themselves on

the legal provisions;

  • It will be in the interest
  • f all stakeholders to

embrace the training and/or sensitization

slide-15
SLIDE 15

How will the Problem look like solved?

15

  • Improved discretionary fiscal space associated with Non-

Lodgment in gross of retained NTR/IGF receipts

  • 70% of all MDAs allowed to retain their IGF will lodge it in

gross;

  • 60% of the projected yield (GH¢1.2bn) will be achieved;
  • Improved discretionary fiscal space by GH¢720m
slide-16
SLIDE 16

ACTION POINTS

16

SRN Entry Point Output Immediate action 1 Lack of Common Data Sharing Platform

  • Relevant stakeholders identified;
  • Draft Concept Paper in place;
  • Stakeholders engagement

workshop organised – workshop report;

  • Processes and systems

established for creating a Common Data Sharing Platform.

  • Finalize report for

presentation;

  • Seek authorization

and approval to act;

  • Develop outline of

draft Concept Paper

slide-17
SLIDE 17

ACTION POINTS

17

SRN Entry Point Output Immediate action 2 Non- Enforcement

  • f Sanctions
  • Non compliant officers

sanctioned

  • Identify evidence of

relevant Audit/PAC Reports recommending punitive and reform actions not applied

slide-18
SLIDE 18

ACTION POINTS

18

SRN Entry Point Output Immediate action 3 Lack of Clarity

  • f Legal

Provisions to MDAs

  • Knowledge of

implementing

  • fficers on the

relevant legal provisions enhanced;

  • Mechanism for

lodgment in gross of Retained NTR/IGF receipts by MDAs properly in place and operational

  • Identify and outline platforms in

the national budget process to implement this activity;

  • Assemble all relevant regulations

governing NTR/IGF mobilisation and management and PFM;

  • Agree with CAGD, affected MDAs

and all relevant stakeholders on modalities for the

  • perationalization of the

mechanism for lodgment in gross

  • f Retained NTR/IGF Receipts
slide-19
SLIDE 19

STATUS OF PLANNED ACTIONS ON ENTRY POINTS

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Key Achievements after framing workshop

20

Buy- in from Directors of Budget, Revenue Policy Division and Economic Research and Forecasting Division;

Finalised training report and submitted for approval; Report approved and Authorization

  • btained from

Honourable Minister for Finance

Prepared Concept Note for the establishment of Data Sharing Platform; Identified common data platform Identified relevant AG’s reports to implement sanctions where necessary; Sensitization of all MDAs/ MMDAs on the relevant sections of PFM Act and the Earmark Fund Capping and Realignment Act

Enhancement of mechanism for lodgement in gross of IGFs receipts; Sensitization of MDAs on the mechanism for lodgment in gross of IGFs receipts;

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • 1. Lack of Clarity of Legal Provisions to MDAs

21

Output Planned Action Status Performance Issues/Remarks Knowledge of implementing officers

  • n the relevant legal

provisions enhanced. Use the national budget process to sensitize MDAs MDAs Sensitized. Achieved Processes used included; Budget Preparation production Workshops; NTR/IGF Projections Workshops; National/Regional Budget Hearings

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • 1. Lack of Clarity of Legal Provisions to MDAs

22

Output Planned Action Status Performance Issues/ Remarks Mechanism for lodgment in gross

  • f Retained

NTR/IGF receipts by MDAs is in place and

  • perational.

Ensure consistency

  • f relevant legal

provisions on lodgement in gross with proposed mechanism. Consistency established. Achieved

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • 1. Lack of Clarity of Legal Provisions to MDAs

23

Output Planned Action Status performance Issues/ Remarks Mechanism for lodgment in gross of Retained NTR/IGF receipts by MDAs properly in place and operational. Seek agreement with CAGD, affected MDAs and all relevant stakeholders on modalities for the

  • perationalization
  • f the mechanism.

Agreement reached and mechanism

  • perational.

Achieved 127 MDAs; Only 49 complying; Major MDAs exempted; Delay in implementation; Revised target to 2.5% of 1.2billion Cedis.

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • 2. Non- Enforcement of Sanctions

24

Output Planned Action Status Performance Issues/ Remarks Non compliant

  • fficers

sanctioned Identify evidence of non- compliance in Audit Reports. No recommendations of punitive and reforms actions identified. Partially achieved Audit reports reviewed (2014 – 2016) did not clearly provide any breaches; Audits in the period did not focus on NTR/IGF.

slide-25
SLIDE 25
  • 3. Lack of Common Data Sharing Platform

25

Output Planned Action Status

Performance

Issues/ Remarks

Common data sharing platform established 1.Draft a concept paper 2.Identify relevant stakeholders 3.Organise stakeholder workshop 4.Establish platform Concept paper developed, stakeholders engaged, platform established Achieved GIFMIS Fiscal Framework Module to serve as Platform, however buy-in needs to be strengthened.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

CHALLENGES

26

  • Competing Priorities;
  • From authorizer
  • From team members
  • Buy-in from key stakeholders
slide-27
SLIDE 27

KEY LESSONS

27

  • “Ownership” and clear understanding of the problem

statement;

  • Identification of risks;
  • Modification and adjustments;
  • Proper team mechanics and team gelling;
slide-28
SLIDE 28

KEY RECOMMENDATIONS/NEXT STEPS

28

  • Further engagement with the Ghana Audit Service;
  • Existing electronic monitoring systems are expanded to improve

implementation of mechanism for lodgement in gross;

  • Regular use of existing budget processes for the sensitization of MDAs

continues;

  • Follow up should be undertaken to ensure sustainability;
  • Collaboration with the CABRI - BSC programme is continued to

maintain the current momentum.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

AUTHORIZER’S ROLE

29

  • Received and evaluated the

team’s work plan, cleared / approved it with some enhancement for further action.

  • Provided quality assurance and

quality control through consultation with a broader stakeholder group

  • Motivated the team and

secured the needed assistance and approvals to undertake their activities

slide-30
SLIDE 30

THANK YOU