Status and realization of an high efficiency transport beam-line for - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

status and realization of an high efficiency transport
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Status and realization of an high efficiency transport beam-line for - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Status and realization of an high efficiency transport beam-line for laser-driven ion beams F. Schillaci IoP-ASCR, ELI-Beamlines Prague, Czech Republic And MEDical application @ ELI-Beamlines INFN-LNS Catania, Italy 25 th International


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Status and realization of an high efficiency transport beam-line for laser-driven ion beams

  • F. Schillaci

IoP-ASCR, ELI-Beamlines

Prague, Czech Republic And INFN-LNS Catania, Italy francesco.schillaci@eli-beams.eu MEDical application @ ELI-Beamlines

25th International Conference on Magnet Technology, Amsterdam 27 August – 01 September 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Laser-driven ion beams

2

  • Large proton number: 1010 ÷ 1013
  • Short bunch duration: few psec
  • High Beam Current: kA
  • !Low Emittance!: 5x10-3 π mm mrad

(microscale spot size but...)

  • Wide Angular Aperture: 10 – 20°

(if we are lucky!)

  • High Energy Spread: ΔE/E >> 10%
  • Low shot-to-shot reproducibilty
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Laser-driven ion beams

3

  • Large proton number: 1010 ÷ 1013
  • Short bunch duration: few psec
  • High Beam Current: kA
  • !Low Emittance!: 5x10-3 π mm mrad

(microscale spot size but...)

  • Wide Angular Aperture: 10 – 20°

(if we are lucky!)

  • High Energy Spread: ΔE/E >> 10%
  • Low shot-to-shot reproducibilty
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Laser-driven ion beams

4

  • Large proton number: 1010 ÷ 1013
  • Short bunch duration: few psec
  • High Beam Current: kA
  • !Low Emittance!: 5x10-3 π mm mrad
  • Wide Angular Aperture: 10 – 20°
  • High Energy Spread: ΔE/E >> 10%
  • Low shot-to-sho reproducibilty
  • High dose-rate per bunch: ~109 Gy/sec

PIC simulations by J. Psikal Expected @ ELI Beamlines

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Laser-driven hadrontherapy

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Laser-driven hadrontherapy

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

ELIMAIA & ELIMED

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

ELIMAIA & ELIMED

8 Beam line elements: 1) Collection system 2) Selection system 3) Standard transport elements (quadrupoles and steerers) 4) in air dosimetry and irradiation Beam line features: 1) Tunability (deliver ion beams from 5 up to 60 MeV/u) with a controllable energy spread (5% up to 20%) and 106- 1011 ions/pulse 2) Large acceptance 3) Flexibility to meet different User requirements

slide-9
SLIDE 9

OUTLINE

9

  • Design of the ELIMAIA Collection System
  • Design of the ELIMAIA Selection System
  • Additional transport elements
  • Beam transport simulations
slide-10
SLIDE 10

OUTLINE

10

  • Design of the ELIMAIA Collection System
  • Design of the ELIMAIA Selection System
  • Additional transport elements
  • Beam transport simulations
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Energy selector Reference orbit and layout

11

ESS Features

Magnetic chicane based on a bunch compressor scheme Path length: 3,168m Two collimators φ = 30 mm, selection slit s x 40 mm. Reference orbit

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Collection and Selection systems matching conditions

12

Linearised chicane to define the PMQs set up according the (general) matching conditions: 1) Waist close to the slit on the radial direction M12=0 2) Parallel beam on the transverse plane M44=0 3) Transmission efficiency of 10% is ensured Input Beam:

  • 60 MeV
  • ±10° uniform

angular spread

  • ~40 μm diameter

Constraints:

  • Target-Quad1 minimum

distance: 50 mm

  • Minimum distance

between Quads: 40 mm

  • Target-ESS distance

2.05 m

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Collection systems

13

5 PMQs are requested to inject the different ion beam (H+ and C+6) with different energy in the selection system 160 mm 120 mm 120 mm 80 mm 80 mm 97 T/m

101 T/m

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Permanent Magnet Quads Preliminary Design

14

NdFeB N48H (Br = 1,39 T Hc= 1273 kA/m) NdFeB N38UH (Br = 1,26 T Hc= 1990 kA/m)

  • F. Schillaci et al., JINST 10 T12001 (2015)

Hybrid multiarray:

  • 36 mm magnetic bore

(3 mm shield + 30 mm for the beam)

  • Inner Halbach trapezoidal

(122 mm outer diameter, two NdFeB alloys)

  • 2 external arrays with rectangular blocks

(223 mm and 322 mm outer diameter)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Permanent Magnet Quads Preliminary Design

15

NdFeB N48H (Br = 1,39 T Hc= 1273 kA/m) NdFeB N38UH (Br = 1,26 T Hc= 1990 kA/m)

  • F. Schillaci et al., JINST 10 T12001 (2015)

Hybrid multiarray:

  • 36 mm magnetic bore

(3 mm shield + 30 mm for the beam)

  • Inner Halbach trapezoidal

(122 mm outer diameter, two NdFeB alloys)

  • 2 external arrays with rectangular blocks

(223 mm and 322 mm outer diameter) M H

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Permanent Magnet Quads Preliminary Design

16

NdFeB N48H (Br = 1,39 T Hc= 1273 kA/m) NdFeB N38UH (Br = 1,26 T Hc= 1990 kA/m)

  • F. Schillaci et al., JINST 10 T12001 (2015)

Hybrid multiarray:

  • 36 mm magnetic bore

(3 mm shield + 30 mm for the beam)

  • Inner Halbach trapezoidal

(122 mm outer diameter, two NdFeB alloys)

  • 2 external arrays with rectangular blocks

(223 mm and 322 mm outer diameter)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Permanent Magnet Quads Preliminary Design

NdFeB N48H (Br = 1,39 T Hc= 1273 kA/m) NdFeB N38UH (Br = 1,26 T Hc= 1990 kA/m)

  • F. Schillaci et al., JINST 10 T12001 (2015)

Hybrid multiarray:

  • 36 mm magnetic bore

(3 mm shield + 30 mm for the beam)

  • Inner Halbach trapezoidal

(122 mm outer diameter, two NdFeB alloys)

  • 2 external arrays with rectangular blocks

(223 mm and 322 mm outer diameter)

Gradient uniformity <2% @ R = 12 mm

Integrated Gradient uniformity < 0.3% @ R = 12 mm

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Permanent Magnet Quads Final Design

18

Model

36 mm magnetic bore

(3 mm shield + 30 mm for the beam – same as INFN design)

Inner Halbach trapezoidal

(149 mm outer diameter, NdFeB N38UH – 27 mm bigger than INFN design)

External array with rectangular blocks

(266 mm NdFeB N48H – 56 mm smaller than INFN design)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Permanent Magnet Quads Final Design

19

Model

Requests Requests

slide-20
SLIDE 20

PMQs + Mechanics

20

  • 6 axis system
  • Vacuum motors with low backlash gear (ration 100:1)
  • Absolute potentiometers for position encoding
  • High precision radiation resistant switches
  • High torques vacuum carriages and rails
slide-21
SLIDE 21

OUTLINE

21

  • Design of the ELIMAIA Collection System
  • Design of the ELIMAIA Selection System
  • Additional transport elements
  • Beam transport simulations
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Emittance Growth and ESS acceptance

22

PMQs ESS

Emittance growth limited to the PMQs system and due to filamentations in the PMQs The highest variations in the emittance are within the first section of the beam-line, namely within the PMQs. The ESS is design to accept the beam transmitted by the collection system.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Emittance Growth and ESS acceptance

23

PMQs ESS

XX` YY` XY α 0.8401 0.3556 0.0002 β (mm/π mrad) 2.7094 2.4484 0.9112

  • Emit. Norm (mm/π mrad)

2.9506 3.9324 24.15 mm2 Xmax Ymax X`max Y`max 14.97 mm 14.99 mm 8.632 mrad 7.162 mrad

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Energy Selector Features

24

n° of Dipoles B field Geometric length Effective length Gap 4 0.085 – 1.2 T 400 mm 451 - 448 mm 59 mm Good Field region (GFR) Field uniformity Curvature radius Bending angle Drift between dipoles 100 mm < 0.5 % 2.570 m 10.10° 500 mm

  • Magnet efficiency: 98%
  • Packing factor: 98%
  • 115.5x168 mm coil section

(11x16 turns, 0,5 mm of insulator, 6 mm water channel)

  • Max current ~200 A
  • Total weight ~3 Tons
  • 40 kWatt in total
  • F. Schillaci et al., JINST 11 P08022 (2016)
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Energy Selector Features

25

n° of Dipoles B field Geometric length Effective length Gap 4 0.06 – 1.226 T 400 mm 450.23 – 448.34 mm 55 mm (shim) Good Field region (GFR) Field uniformity Curvature radius Bending angle Drift between dipoles 100 mm < 0.5 % 2.570 m 10.10° 500 mm

  • Magnet efficiency: 97%
  • Packing factor: 99% (1 mm lamination)
  • 116x116 mm coil section

(10x10 turns, 0.4 mm of insulator, 4 mm water channel)

  • Max current: 300 A
  • Total weight: 2.6 Tons
  • < 28 kWatt in total

n° of Dipoles B field Geometric length Effective length Gap 4 0.06 – 1.226 T 400 mm 450.23 – 448.34 mm 55 mm (shim) Good Field region (GFR) Field uniformity Curvature radius Bending angle Drift between dipoles 100 mm 0.4 % 2.570 m 10.10° 500 mm Reinforcemente to guarantee 42 mm inner clearence in the vacuum chamber

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Double Dispersive Mode Magnetic Chicane

26

30 mm collimator upstream and downstream the chicane (200 mm far from dipoles) Variable slit aperture size (4 up to 20 mm)

  • F. Schillaci et al., JINST 11 P08022 (2016)
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Not just a magnetic chicane... Towards an active energy modulator

27

If the current is changed each second (each laser shot) the system could be used as an active energy modulator system Induced sextupole due to the eddy current on the vacuum chamber can be neglected after 0.31s Current ramp from 0 up to max current in 0.28s (B = 1,2 T) Eddy Current Loop

  • F. Schillaci et al., JINST 11 P08022 (2016)

Induced current density Jmax = 1,15 x 106 A/m2

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Not just a magnetic chicane... Towards an active energy modulator

28

Eddy Current Loop Harmonic components vs time

A general model for harmonic component study is presented in my talk Error and optics study of a permanent magnet quadrupole system [Thu-Mo- Or33]

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Not just a magnetic chicane... Towards an active energy modulator

Jmax = 0.5 x 105 A/m2

More realistic calculation: 20 % field variation (1 T → 1,2 T) in 1 sec

slide-30
SLIDE 30

OUTLINE

30

  • Design of the ELIMAIA Collection System
  • Design of the ELIMAIA Selection System
  • Additional transport elements
  • Beam transport simulations
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Quads and Steerers

31

Iron length: 296mm Packing factor 98% Effective length: 331.5 mm Gradient (max): 10T/m Bore: 70 mm GFR: 55 mm Quads Specs: xy steering magnets B max: 300 gauss Geometrical length: 150mm Correctors Specs:

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Quads and Steerers

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

OUTLINE

33

  • Design of the ELIMAIA Collection System
  • Design of the ELIMAIA Selection System
  • Additional transport elements
  • Beam transport simulations
slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

PIC simulations by J. Psikal Expected @ ELI Beamlines

Exponential energy distribution Cut-off 105 MeV Beam spot size ~ 40μm diameter Uniform angular distribution (±17° @ 60 MeV) HUGE ANGULAR APERTURE > 15°

Worst Case Scenario!

PIC simulation ELIMAIA source

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Beam transport 60 MeV protons

Wanted output beam: Protons with central energy of 60 MeV and 20% spread Beam envelope for reference beam 60 MeV protons and phase space plot at the ESS output Reference beam losses ~ 80%

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Beam transport 60 MeV protons

St1 St2 St1 St2 St2

3T/m

  • 3T/m

3T/m

  • 3T/m

Out of PMQs+ESS used in input for preliminary simulation of last beam-line section

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

Beam transport TNSA-like protons

Angular divergence = 5° (FWHM) Transmission efficiency ~12% (9,2e7 H+/bunch)

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Beam transport TNSA-like protons

Angular divergence = 5° (FWHM) Transmission efficiency ~12% (9,2e7 H+/bunch)

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

Beam transport TNSA-like protons

Angular divergence = 5° (FWHM) Transmission efficiency ~12% (9,2e7 H+/bunch)

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

Beam transport TNSA-like protons

Angular divergence = 5° (FWHM) Transmission efficiency ~12% (9,2e7 H+/bunch)

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

Beam transport TNSA-like protons

Angular divergence = 5° (FWHM) Transmission efficiency ~12% (9,2e7 H+/bunch)

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42

Beam transport TNSA-like protons

Angular divergence = 5° (FWHM) Transmission efficiency ~12% (9,2e7 H+/bunch)

slide-43
SLIDE 43

43

Beam transport simulations

vs

Real beam transport

  • Can we trust such results?
  • Can be the transport codes for

conventional accelerator studies used for laser-driven particles?

  • Which are the limits?
slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

Beam transport simulations

vs

Real beam transport @ LOA (Fr)

  • F. Schillaci et al., JINST 10 T05001 (2015)
  • F. Schillaci et al., JINST 11 T07005 (2016)
slide-45
SLIDE 45

45

  • F. Schillaci et al., JINST 10 T05001 (2015)
  • F. Schillaci et al., JINST 11 T07005 (2016)

Conclusion

  • Beam line elements have been designed considering all possible

issues

(For PMQs: demagnetization, thermal stability, secondary neutron flux and forces between magnets. Realization is in progress. For Dipoles: field uniformity along the reference trajectory, effective length variation and eddy currents. Final design is in progress.)

  • Beam line performances are satisfactory

(At least 107 particles per pulse transmitted in the wanted energy range.)

  • Beam line set up have to be optimized

(Final design of the magnets and precise input beam features to improve optics and PMQs+ESS matching.)

  • Last part of the beam line study is almost done

(Simulations with TNSA-like beams to be carried out.)

  • Beam output features to be improved

(MC simulations for improving of the beam homogeneity with passive elements)

slide-46
SLIDE 46

46

  • F. Schillaci et al., JINST 10 T05001 (2015)
  • F. Schillaci et al., JINST 11 T07005 (2016)

Thank you for your attention

http://www.eli-beams.eu/ INFN: G.A.P. Cirrone, V. Scuderi, F. Romano, M. Maggiore, A. Russo, G. Cuttone, R. Leanza,

  • G. Milluzzo, G. Petringa, J. Pipek

ELI-BL: D. Margarone, G. Korn, V. Scuderi, F. Schillaci, L. Giuffrida, A. Fajstavr SigmaPhi: M. J. Leray, O. Tasset-Maye, S. Antoine, P. Jehanno

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Permanent Magnet Quads Final Design

47

Model

Requests

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Dipole design

48

Pole shape

  • Lateral shimming for increasing field

uniformity (< 0.5% for all fields)

  • Rogowski longitudinal shape to reduce

effective length variation from the lowest to the highest field (448 mm – 451 mm) Yoke Saturation

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Dipole design

49

Field uniformity

  • Lateral shimming for increasing field

uniformity (< 0.5% for all fields)

  • Rogowski longitudinal shape to reduce

effective length variation from the lowest to the highest field (448 mm – 451 mm) Yoke Saturation

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Dipole design

50

Pole shape and yoke saturation Radial field uniformity 0.4% Field uniformity in the GFR

slide-51
SLIDE 51

PMQs + Mechanics @ ELI-Beamlines

51

Target Thomson Parabola Spectrometer line of sight L a s e r B e a m Beam axis Courtesy of M. Costa