statistical genetics
play

Statistical Genetics Matthew Stephens Statistics Retreat, October - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Statistical Genetics Matthew Stephens Statistics Retreat, October 26th 2012 Matthew Stephens Retreat Talk 2012 Two stories The two most influential statistical ideas in analysis of genetic association studies. 1 Sequence, sequence,


  1. Statistical Genetics Matthew Stephens Statistics Retreat, October 26th 2012 Matthew Stephens Retreat Talk 2012

  2. Two stories ◮ The two most influential statistical ideas in analysis of genetic association studies. 1 ◮ Sequence, sequence, everywhere. 1 With apologies to Steve Stigler Matthew Stephens Retreat Talk 2012

  3. Story I: Genetic Association Studies Genetic association studies aim to identify genetic variants that modify risk of common diseases or affect other phenotypes (e.g. Type I Diabetes, height, LDL cholestrol). The idea is absurdly simple: measure genetic variants (usually SNPs), and phenotypes in randomly-sampled individuals, and see which SNPs are correlated with phenotypes. Matthew Stephens Retreat Talk 2012

  4. Story I: Genetic Association Studies ◮ Typical recent genome-wide studies have typed 500K-1M SNPs in thousands of (unrelated) phenotyped individuals. ◮ Basic Analysis: test each SNP, one-by-one, for statistical association with each phenotype. Matthew Stephens Retreat Talk 2012

  5. Progress identifying variants underlying common disease Published Genome ‐ Wide Associations through 09/2011 1,617 published GWA at p ≤ 5X10 ‐ 8 for 249 traits NHGRI GWA Catalog www.genome.gov/GWAStudies Matthew Stephens Credit: Retreat Talk 2012

  6. The two most influential statistical ideas in GWAS ◮ Correction for unmeasured confounding (population structure). ◮ Imputation to combine studies. Matthew Stephens Retreat Talk 2012

  7. Population Structure and Unmeasured Confounding The Problem in a nutshell: What would happen if you conducted a Genetic Association study for “Chopstick Use” in San Francisco? Matthew Stephens Retreat Talk 2012

  8. Population Structure and Unmeasured Confounding If you know the “genetic background” of the individuals in your study (e.g. which continent they inherited their genes from), then you can correct for it. What if you don’t know it? Matthew Stephens Retreat Talk 2012

  9. Principal Components Analysis to the rescue! Novembre et al, Nature, 2008 Matthew Stephens Retreat Talk 2012

  10. Principal Components Analysis to the rescue! Test for significance of genetic effect β , controlling for effects of genetic background ( α ): y = v α + x β + ǫ Price et al, Nature Genetics, 2006 Matthew Stephens Retreat Talk 2012

  11. The two most influential statistical ideas in GWAS ◮ Correction for unmeasured confounding (population structure). ◮ Imputation to combine studies. Credit: Bryan Howie Matthew Stephens Retreat Talk 2012

  12. Genotype(imputa-on(background( 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% Reference( 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% haplotypes( 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% ?% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% Phenotyped ( 1% 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% GWAS ( ?% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% samples ( 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% ?% 0% 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% SNPs%genotyped%on%an%array% Matthew Stephens Retreat Talk 2012

  13. Genotype(imputa-on(background( 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% Reference( 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% haplotypes( 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% ?% ?% ?% 2% ?% 0% ?% ?% ?% ?% 0% 1% ?% 1% 1% ?% ?% ?% 1% ?% 0% ?% ?% ?% ?% ?% 0% ?% 0% 0% ?% ?% ?% 1% ?% 1% ?% ?% ?% ?% 1% 0% ?% 1% Phenotyped ( 1% ?% ?% ?% 2% ?% 0% ?% ?% ?% ?% 0% 1% ?% 1% GWAS ( ?% ?% ?% ?% 2% ?% 0% ?% ?% ?% ?% 0% 0% ?% 0% samples ( 1% ?% ?% ?% 1% ?% 1% ?% ?% ?% ?% 1% 0% ?% ?% 0% ?% ?% ?% 2% ?% 0% ?% ?% ?% ?% 0% 1% ?% 1% 1% ?% ?% ?% 1% ?% 1% ?% ?% ?% ?% 1% 1% ?% 2% Untyped%SNPs% Matthew Stephens Retreat Talk 2012

  14. Genotype(imputa-on(background( 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% Reference( 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% haplotypes( 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 0% 0% 1% 2% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 2% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% Phenotyped ( 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0% 0% 1% 2% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% GWAS ( 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% samples ( 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% Associa8on% signal% Matthew Stephens Retreat Talk 2012

  15. Imputa-on(facilitates(meta>analysis( 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% Reference( 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% haplotypes( 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% GWAS(1 ( 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 2% 0% GWAS(2 ( 2% 2% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% Matthew Stephens Retreat Talk 2012

  16. Imputa-on(facilitates(meta>analysis( 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% Reference( 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% haplotypes( 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% GWAS(1 ( 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 2% 0% 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% GWAS(2 ( 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% Associa8on% signal% Matthew Stephens Retreat Talk 2012

  17. Imputa-on(facilitates(meta>analysis( 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% Reference( 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% haplotypes( 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% GWAS(1 ( 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 2% 0% 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% GWAS(2 ( 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% Type%1%diabetes:%Cooper%et%al.,%Nov%2008%( Nature'Gene*cs )% Type%2%diabetes:%Zeggini%et%al.,%May%2008%( Nature'Gene*cs )% Crohn’s%disease:%BarreH%et%al.,%Aug%2008%( Nature'Gene*cs )% Matthew Stephens Retreat Talk 2012

  18. Story II: Sequence, Sequence, Everywhere Matthew Stephens Retreat Talk 2012

  19. Sequencing Assays, and Statistical Challenges Although DNA sequencing is best known for obtaining “genome sequences”, it is now routinely used for measuring cellular processes to try to understand how cells operate. For example: ◮ Gene expression (RNA-seq). ◮ Chromatin openness (DNase-seq). ◮ Transcription Factor Binding (ChIP-seq) ◮ Histone modifications (ChIP-seq) A key question is how/why cells differ from one another (they share the same DNA!). Matthew Stephens Retreat Talk 2012

  20. Chromatin and DNA structure Figure from Felsenfeld and Groudine. Nature, 2003 Matthew Stephens Retreat Talk 2012

  21. The Data The basic structure of these assays is the same: ◮ Do something clever to get bits of the DNA that you want (e.g. the bits that contact a modified histone, or the bits that are bound by a particular transcription factor). ◮ Sequence these bits (producing millions of little sequences). ◮ Work out where in the genome each sequence came from. ◮ The number of sequences coming from each location (usually 0 or 1) is a measure of the “intensity” of the process at that location. ◮ Basic model: an inhomogeneous Poisson process, x ib ∼ Poi ( λ ib ). Matthew Stephens Retreat Talk 2012

  22. Example: Histone Modification H3K4me1 Can you spot the difference? Left Ventricle, H3K4me1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00 32230000 32250000 32270000 32290000 Right Ventricle, H3K4me1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00 32230000 32250000 32270000 32290000 Data from Scott Smemo, Nobrega lab Matthew Stephens Retreat Talk 2012

  23. Advertisement: STAT 45800 We have preliminary ideas and methods for dealing with these data, based on wavelets for count data (work with H. Shim). In STAT 45800 we will try “crowd-sourcing” these ideas, to see how much further progress we can make. Aim: to combine expertises in Bioinformatics, Computing, Biology and Statistics, to make more progress together than any of us could do alone! Matthew Stephens Retreat Talk 2012

  24. Acknowledgements ◮ Bryan Howie, Heejung Shim. ◮ Funding: NHGRI, NIH GTEX project, and NIH ENDGAME consortium. Matthew Stephens Retreat Talk 2012

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend