Statistical Analysis Of Commercial Vehicle Border Crossing Times and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

statistical analysis of commercial vehicle border
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Statistical Analysis Of Commercial Vehicle Border Crossing Times and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Statistical Analysis Of Commercial Vehicle Border Crossing Times and Volumes: Case Study Of The Pacific Highway Port-of-Entry Free And Secure Trade Lane Thesis Presentation By Li Ying Leung Wednesday, June 10, 2009 8:00 am More 119 Pacific


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Statistical Analysis Of Commercial Vehicle Border Crossing Times and Volumes: Case Study Of The Pacific Highway Port-of-Entry Free And Secure Trade Lane

Thesis Presentation By Li Ying Leung

Wednesday, June 10, 2009 8:00 am More 119

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Pacific Highway Port-of-Entry

2

FAST Lane

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Findings (1 of 2)

3

  • 1. Relationships between crossing

times and arrival volume

a)

Strong correlation at aggregate level

b)

Not strong at a disaggregate level

  • 2. Non-primary crossing times

contribute to very long crossing times

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Findings (2 of 2)

4

  • 3. FAST lane utilized by vehicles who

transport:

a)

Bulk

b)

Empty

  • 4. Complex sampling can

a) reduce resources b) same results with higher precision

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Very Long Crossing Times Methods

5

1)

Temporal Trends of arrival volumes and crossing times

2)

Correlation between arrival volumes and crossing times

3)

Primary and Non-Primary Concepts

4)

Lane Utilization by Commodity

¤ Complex Sample Survey

Techniques

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Crossing Time Data Set

¨ Jet Star GPS Data Set ¨ Southbound ¨ July 10, 2005 through May 19, 2009 ¨ FAST Hours: 8AM-8PM

Mondays through Fridays

6

#Obs Mean Standard Deviation Median Min Max 13,680 00:17:03 00:19:18 00:11:44 00:00:14 04:42:51

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Arrival Volume Data Set

¨ BC MoT Data Set ¨ 5 minute average

intervals

¨ 5 paired loop detectors ¨ November 13, 2006

through May 5, 2008

¨ FAST Hours ¨ 388,500 observations

7

Source: WCOG Border Data Warehouse Source: Google Maps

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Trends between Arrival Volume and Crossing Times in 2007

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Temporal Correlations (R)

9

Seasons R Average crossing time Spring 0.43 19 minutes, 25 seconds Summer 0.46 17 minutes, 38 seconds Fall 0.22 16 minutes, 30 seconds Winter 0.32 21 minutes, 38 seconds Weekdays R Average crossing time Monday 0.37 20 minutes, 35 seconds Tuesday 0.30 18 minutes, 25 seconds Wednesday 0.40 19 minutes, 38 seconds Thursday 0.44 15 minutes, 9 seconds Friday 0.46 22 minutes, 24 seconds

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Primary and Non-Primary

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Lane Choice Analysis

11

— WCOG Manifest data

— High resolution for

microscopic time period data

— June 5-8, 2006 — 1,200 observations

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Hypothesis Testing

12

¨ Test the differences between average

lane choice by commodity

¨ Null Hypothesis:

¤ “Is there a difference between a

commodity’s lane choice and the lane choice for all commodities”

¨ Alternative Hypothesis:

¤ There is no difference

¨ Significance level of 5%

The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been
  • corrupted. Restart your computer, and then open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and
then insert it again. The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been
  • corrupted. Restart your computer, and then open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and
then insert it again.
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Two-Sample T-Test Results

13

Commodity Type Significance Lane Choice Manufacturing

✔ Middle

Unknown x Food

✔ Middle

Wood x Bulk

✔ FAST

Farm x Printed Matters x Empty Truck Container/Pallet

✔ FAST

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Methodologies

14

Temporal Trends Correlation between Crossing Times and Arrival Volume Primary and Non-Primary Crossing Times Lane Choice Analysis Very Long Crossing Times

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Complex Sampling Analysis

15

¨ “A simple random sample is almost

always better than a non-random

  • sample. A more complex random

sample is often even better than a simple random sample: lower cost for the same precision” (Lumley, 2009)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Parameter Estimation of 2007

16

Sampling Type Mean Standard Error Empirical 00:18:58 00:20:19 Simple Random Sampling 00:19:00 00:21:47 Simulated 00:19:02 00:01:26 Empirical Mean

  • f the Standard

Deviation Simulated Mean

  • f the Standard

Deviation Standard Error of the Standard Deviation 00:20:19 00:19:51 00:03:38

Standard Deviation Estimates Mean Estimates

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Complex Sampling

17

Year Bootstrap Simple Random Sample Empirical Data Mean Standard error Mean Standard error Mean Standard error 2007 00:17:37 00:00:48 00:19:16 00:20:42 00:18:58 00:20:19 2008 00:17:36 00:02:02 00:15:31 00:22:37 00:14:47 00:19:32

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Recommendations

¨ Sample survey ¤ Infer the same

estimates with less costs

¤ High resolution

for macroscopic time period data

¨ Applied to future

studies

¤ Sumas ¤ Lynden ¤ Blaine

18

Source: WCOG 2009

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Thank you

Contact Information: Li Leung lileung@u.washington.edu

19