State of Hawaii Office of Planning FIVE YEAR BOUNDARY REVIEW - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

state of hawaii office of planning five year boundary
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

State of Hawaii Office of Planning FIVE YEAR BOUNDARY REVIEW - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

State of Hawaii Office of Planning FIVE YEAR BOUNDARY REVIEW February 2014 Office of Planning (OP) Planning Division Land Use Division Geographic Coastal Zone Special Plans Information Management Program Systems (GIS) (CZM)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

State

  • f

Hawaii

Office

  • f

Planning

FIVE–YEAR BOUNDARY REVIEW

February 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Office of Planning (OP)

Planning Division Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Program Special Plans Program Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Program Land Use Division

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

State Land Use Law

Act 187, SLH 1961

  • Ori

rigina ginal Intent ent:

“preserve,

protect, and encourage the development

  • f

the lands in the State for those uses to which they are best suited for the public welfare.”

  • La

Land Use Districts tricts: – Urban, Agricultural, Conservation, Rural (1963) – Agricultural District was the catch-all district

6/28/2013

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Office

  • f

Planning’s Role

Ensure

  • rderly

growth

  • f

the State by protecting and encouraging the use

  • f

lands for long term public benefit.

State Land Use Commission

Coordinate and present the State’s position in LUC proceedings

  • Boundary

petitions, Declaratory Rulings, Special Permits, IAL

slide-5
SLIDE 5

State Land Use Districts (Feb 2013)

6/28/2013

slide-6
SLIDE 6

State Land Use Law

Act 187, SLH 1961

  • In

Initial al Role

  • f

La Land Use Co Comm mmission

1.

  • 1. Det

eter ermine mine bounda dari ries es 2.

  • 2. Decide

cide

  • n

proposed am amendm dments ents 3.

  • 3. Condu

duct ct peri riodic dic, compreh ehens ensive ive reviews ews

  • f

clas assifica ificatio tion an and di distri ricting cting

  • f

al all lan ands ds

6/28/2013

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Five-Year Boundary Reviews

  • 1969

69 : LU LUC w/EDAW AW plan anner ers

  • 1974

74 : LU LUC w/MKGKY GKY plan anners rs

  • 1990

90 : OP w/Wilso lson Okam amoto,

  • to,

John Ford, d, Munekiy kiyo,

  • thers

rs

– 2 year ars

  • f

studi dies es – 4 year ars

  • f

boundary ndary am amendme dment nts

6/28/2013

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Five-Year Boundary Reviews Resulting Changes

in Land Use Districts

(in acres) s)

CONSERV

RVATIO TION AGRICULTURAL TURAL URBAN AN RURAL AL

  • 1969

69 : +148,000 8,000

  • 159

59,000 ,000 +12,0 2,000

  • 1,00

000

  • 1974

74 :

  • 9,00

,000 +8,00 ,000 +1,00 000

  • 1990

90 : +15,0 5,000

  • 23,00

,000 +8,00 000

6/28/2013

slide-9
SLIDE 9

State Land Use Classifications

1969

U 3% C 49% A 48% R 0%

2013

U 5% C 49% A 46% R 0%

11/12/13

slide-10
SLIDE 10

HRS Section 205-18 Periodic review

  • f

districts

“The

  • ffice

ce

  • f

plannin ing shall ll underta rtake ke a review

  • f

the classif sifica catio tion and districtin icting

  • f

all lands in the State, within five years from December 31, 1985, and every fifth year

  • thereafter. The
  • ffice

ce shall ll focus its efforts

  • rts
  • n

reviewin ing the Hawai aii state plan, county ty general al plans, s, and county ty developm lopmen ent and community ity plans.

  • s. Upon

completion

  • f

the five-year boundary review, the

  • ffice

shall submit a report

  • f

the findings to the

  • commission. The
  • ffice

ce may initiate te state te land use boundary dary amendmen ents ts which it deems appropriate to conform to these

  • lands. The
  • ffice

may seek assistance

  • f

appropriate state and county agencies and may employ consultants and undertake studies in making this review.” (emphases added)

6/28/2013

slide-11
SLIDE 11

OP Five-Year Boundary Review 2014

Phase 1

  • Conduct

the periodic review per HRS Section 205-18, but witho hout ut pursuing any boundary amendments.

  • Use

OP’s GIS maps and data files for analysis and

  • presentation. Focus
  • n:

– Urban growth boundaries identified by counties compared to State Urban District – Agricultural lands productivity ALISH, LSB, NRCS soil ratings – IAL designations approved (100,000+ acres)

6/28/2013

slide-12
SLIDE 12

6/28/2013

slide-13
SLIDE 13

OP Five-Year Boundary Review 2014

Phas ase 2 State La Land Use Review PURPOS OSE

Review the State Land Use District Boundary Amendment process in HRS Chapter 205 and provide recommendations to the State Land Use Commission, Governor and the Legislature to improve its efficiency and effectiveness without compromising the

  • riginal

intent

  • f

the law.

6/28/2013

slide-14
SLIDE 14

OP Five-Year Boundary Review 2014

Phase 2 State La Land Use Review

Concerns raised

  • ver

the years:

  • 1. Project-by-project

review is not good planning

  • 2. Time-consuming,

costly process

  • 3. Over-emphasis
  • n

narrowly-focused,

  • ften

heated public hearings

  • 4. Reliance
  • n

litigation to resolve planning and zoning

6/28/2013

slide-15
SLIDE 15

OP Five-Year Boundary Review 2014

Phase 2 State La Land Use Review

Concerns raised

  • ver

the years (cont.):

  • 5. Uncertainty
  • n

what is permissible

  • 6. Confusion
  • n

allowable uses

  • f

Agricultural District

  • 7. Duplicative

State and county reviews

  • 8. Process

does not provide long range comprehensive planning and coordination between State and county land use and capital program planning

6/28/2013

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Lands in State Land Use Districts 2013

Acres Percent Conservation 2,022,299 49.0 Agricultural 1,885,004 45.8 Urban 205,036 4.9 Rural 11,054 0.3

A 46% 46% C 49% 49% U 5% 5% R 0% 0%

Agricultural Conservation Urban Rural

11/12/13

slide-17
SLIDE 17

City & County

  • f

Honolulu

6/28/2013

slide-18
SLIDE 18

County

  • f

Maui

6/28/2013

slide-19
SLIDE 19

County

  • f

Hawaii

6/28/2013

slide-20
SLIDE 20

OP Five-Year Boundary Review 2014

Phase 2 State La Land Use Review

1.

  • 1. Desi

sired ed Outcome: me: A more efficient and effective process without compromising the

  • riginal

intent

  • f

the law. 2.

  • 2. Mean

ans: s: Convene a task force

  • f

diverse stakeholders, including county planning, public and private interests to discuss and develop recommendations.

  • 3. Review

past efforts to revise the land use system (1994, 1997, 2005, and 2006).

6/28/2013

slide-21
SLIDE 21

OP Five-Year Boundary Review 2014

Sch chedule le

  • Phase

1 GIS analysis by mid-2014

  • Phase

2 Task Force Review by early 2015

  • Consider

potential legislation

6/28/2013

slide-22
SLIDE 22

State

  • f

Hawaii

Office

  • f

Planning

Office

  • f

Planning State

  • f

Hawaii P.O. Box 2359 | Honolulu, HI 96804-2359 Ph: (808) 587-2846 Web: http://planning.hawaii.gov Twitter: PlanningHIgov Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/OfficeofPlanning.HIgov

Mahalo!