Stakeholder involvem ent in fishing gear selectivity developm ent - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

stakeholder involvem ent in fishing gear selectivity
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Stakeholder involvem ent in fishing gear selectivity developm ent - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Stakeholder involvem ent in fishing gear selectivity developm ent Can it increase the success of the Landing Obligation? Jordan Feekings Research Scientist DTU Aqua HELCOM FISH 5-2016 New EU Com m on Fisheries Policy Discards/ unwanted


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Stakeholder involvem ent in fishing gear selectivity developm ent

Can it increase the success of the Landing Obligation?

Jordan Feekings Research Scientist DTU Aqua HELCOM FISH 5-2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

New EU Com m on Fisheries Policy

  • Discards/ unwanted catch now

has a value

  • Counts towards quotas
  • Fishermen now have an

economic incentive to improve their selectivity

  • Objectives of the management

system and those of the fishermen are aligned

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Num ber Carapace length ( m m )

4 0 m m / ~ 1 3 cm MLS

Discards Landings

slide-3
SLIDE 3

New CFP and gear selectivity What we expect

  • Fishermen will need to modify their gears more actively

throughout the year

  • Gear modifications on a vessel not fleet level
  • Gears will need to match quotas
slide-4
SLIDE 4

W hat are the traditional w ays gears have been im plem ented in Denm ark/ EU?

  • Often prescribed in a top-down manner where minimum requirements

are described in legislations – Minimum mesh sizes – Mesh shapes – Mandatory use of grids or panels – Size and placement of panels – Bar spacing in grids – Twine thickness

  • Becom es m icro m anagem ent
slide-5
SLIDE 5

W hat are the pitfalls of a top-dow n approach?

  • Slow and inflexible system
  • Gears often very sensitive to small changes

– Reason to why technical regulations get longer and longer

  • Selectivity improvements negated

– Simple changes can have a large effect on selectivity Fishery Gear trial

Krag et al. 2016

slide-6
SLIDE 6

W hat are the pitfalls of a top-dow n approach?

  • Reduces sense of ownership the fishermen have over their fishery
  • The inflexibility of most regulatory systems provides fishermen with little

possibility to develop and test more selective fishing practices.

  • One system is expected to fit all in an area.

I T’S A RENTAL DON’T BE GENTLE

slide-7
SLIDE 7

An alternative to a top-dow n approach

  • A bottom-up approach

– Utilises industries unique practical knowledge – Gives industry a chance to take an active role – Creates ownership

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Idea Evaluation Industry testing Scientific testing Evaluation

Fast-Track system

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Fast-Track w w w .fast-track.dk

  • Close collaboration with the commission regarding the Fast-Track

approach to the development of gears

  • And regarding the reform of the new technical measures
  • Has the possibility to influence legislation/ the implementation of the LO

system

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Thanks for listening