stakeholder involvem ent in fishing gear selectivity
play

Stakeholder involvem ent in fishing gear selectivity developm ent - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Stakeholder involvem ent in fishing gear selectivity developm ent Can it increase the success of the Landing Obligation? Jordan Feekings Research Scientist DTU Aqua HELCOM FISH 5-2016 New EU Com m on Fisheries Policy Discards/ unwanted


  1. Stakeholder involvem ent in fishing gear selectivity developm ent Can it increase the success of the Landing Obligation? Jordan Feekings Research Scientist DTU Aqua HELCOM FISH 5-2016

  2. New EU Com m on Fisheries Policy • Discards/ unwanted catch now 4 0 m m / ~ 1 3 cm MLS has a value 16 Discards • Counts towards quotas 14 Landings 12 • Fishermen now have an 10 economic incentive to improve Num ber their selectivity 8 6 • Objectives of the management 4 system and those of the 2 fishermen are aligned 0 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Carapace length ( m m )

  3. New CFP and gear selectivity What we expect • Fishermen will need to modify their gears more actively throughout the year • Gear modifications on a vessel not fleet level • Gears will need to match quotas

  4. W hat are the traditional w ays gears have been im plem ented in Denm ark/ EU? • Often prescribed in a top-down manner where minimum requirements are described in legislations – Minimum mesh sizes – Mesh shapes – Mandatory use of grids or panels – Size and placement of panels – Bar spacing in grids – Twine thickness • Becom es m icro m anagem ent

  5. W hat are the pitfalls of a top-dow n approach? • Slow and inflexible system • Gears often very sensitive to small changes – Reason to why technical regulations get longer and longer • Selectivity improvements negated – Simple changes can have a large effect on selectivity Fishery Gear trial Krag et al. 2016

  6. W hat are the pitfalls of a top-dow n approach? • Reduces sense of ownership the fishermen have over their fishery • The inflexibility of most regulatory systems provides fishermen with little possibility to develop and test more selective fishing practices. • One system is expected to fit all in an area. I T’S A RENTAL DON’T BE GENTLE

  7. An alternative to a top-dow n approach • A bottom-up approach – Utilises industries unique practical knowledge – Gives industry a chance to take an active role – Creates ownership

  8. Fast-Track Idea system Evaluation Industry testing Evaluation Scientific testing

  9. Fast-Track w w w .fast-track.dk • Close collaboration with the commission regarding the Fast-Track approach to the development of gears • And regarding the reform of the new technical measures • Has the possibility to influence legislation/ the implementation of the LO system

  10. Thanks for listening

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend