CAEP Standard 3: Candidate Selectivity (3.2/3.3) & Professional Introduction Videos _______________________ Dr. Elodie Jones, Assistant Professor, Education and Dr. Paul Nienkamp, Associate Professor, History Poll Anywhere: Text ELODIEJONES1 to 37607
Professional Introduction Videos: WHY? • Aligning with Standard 3: Candidate Selectivity (3.2/3.3) – 3.2: Criteria of admissions (application) – 3.3: Additional selectivity factors (dispositions) Meeting the Standard - GPA, ACT and beyond… • – Origin and development of tools & process • Addressing dispositions/soft skills • Data collection and curation • Assembling a team and piloting – Committee changes and tool validation
Hindsight is always clear, or The Development of a Process • Grounded knowledge in assessing video • Understanding what to assess/ EPP goals • Managing the technology (faculty/student) • Piloting the tool and gaining feedback • Managing data and feedback (TK20)
Moving from Point A to Point P: Progression of Assessment Tools • Rubric #1 to pilot (non-CAEP) – Development (Spring 2014) • Developers knowledge level/Research – Use of the tool (Fall 2014) – Grader feedback – Selectivity changes • The grapevine effect
Rubric #1: Initial UNSATISFACTORY PROFICIENT COMMUNICATION SKILLS • Language usage and the ability to clearly articulate oral comments (grammar, semantics, syntax) PREPARATION • Adequate video background (lighting/distractions, etc.) • Attire/Appearance • Rehearsed/Prepared video content • Sequential and relevant video content • Video length • Video format (video is able to be played and is in the correct orientation)
Rubric #2 - Piloting • Tool #2 to pilot – CAEP-aligned – Development – Training – Use to establish reliability and validity
Revised Rubric From 2 competencies to 7 competencies Communication Preparation Skills Prompt 1: Introduction/ Prompt #2: Respect Greatest Closing for Student Differences Strength Statements Professionalism Preparation Communication Technology Use
And a lot of videos later… Professional Introduction Video Data • Data collection that tells us: – 605 video’s viewed (Fall 2014 -Spring 2017) – 509 Pass/96 Not Pass – Communication = 2 Not Pass – Preparation = 94 Not Pass • Criteria for and design of follow-up policies – Remake criteria
EPP Video Data Item on Instrument EPP Total F 2014 S 2015 F 2015 S 2016 F 2016 S 2017 N = 92 135 120 172 86 142 P = 70 115 101 147 76 123 Total 22 20 19 NP = 25 10 19 N = 92 135 120 172 86 142 P = 92 135 120 170 86 142 Communication NP = 0 0 0 2 0 0 N = 92 135 120 172 86 142 P = 70 115 19 149 76 123 Preparation NP = 22 20 101 23 10 19 605 Total N=
Key Take Away(s) and Discussion • Establish your EPP’s overall goal and alignment with Standard(s) • Establish how/who you will manage the data (e.g., TK20) • Establish a flow chart and rubric for validating tools in EPP • Training processes in your EPP • Where are we going from here…
Recommend
More recommend
