Spurious Mixing in MOM6 An energetic approach Angus Gibson May 27, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

spurious mixing in mom6
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Spurious Mixing in MOM6 An energetic approach Angus Gibson May 27, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Spurious Mixing in MOM6 An energetic approach Angus Gibson May 27, 2016 Overview Motivation Understand the numerical accuracy of different: remapping schemes advection schemes vertical coordinates Evaluate MOM6? Reference


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Spurious Mixing in MOM6

An energetic approach Angus Gibson May 27, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Overview

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Motivation

◮ Understand the numerical accuracy of different:

◮ remapping schemes ◮ advection schemes ◮ vertical coordinates

◮ Evaluate MOM6?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Reference (background) potential energy

◮ The lowest potential energy state of a fluid

◮ Adiabatically resort to a stratified state

◮ Should be constant in an unforced model with closed

boundaries

◮ Increased by mixing; centre of mass is raised

RPE = g

zρ∗(z) dV

◮ Gives no localised information

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Looking at a timestep

◮ MOM6 is a generalised vertical coordinate model (ALE)

◮ Clear distinction between along- and across-coordinate dynamics

◮ Take differences in RPE from different parts of a timestep to

determine their contribution

◮ ∆RPEadv = RPEpost adv − RPEpre adv ◮ ∆RPEale = RPEpost ale − RPEpre ale

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Experiments

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Overview

◮ We follow experiments from Ilicak et al. (2012) and Petersen

et al. (2015):

◮ Lock exchange (dam break) ◮ Overflow (downslope flow) ◮ Internal gravity waves ◮ Baroclinic eddies

◮ Spurious mixing is investigated as a function of the grid

Reynolds number: Re∆ = U∆x νh

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Overflow

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Low viscosity

Figure 1: z∗ coordinate at Re∆ = 1.5 × 105

slide-10
SLIDE 10

High viscosity

Figure 2: z∗ coordinate at Re∆ = 1.5

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Low viscosity (sigma)

Figure 3: Sigma coordinate at Re∆ = 1.5 × 105

slide-12
SLIDE 12

High viscosity (sigma)

Figure 4: Sigma coordinate at Re∆ = 1.5

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Figure 5: Model comparison (mean dRPE/dt over entire run)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Baroclinic eddies

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Figure 6: Surface snapshot

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Figure 7: Solid: MPAS-O, dashed: MOM6

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Figure 8: Model comparison

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Figure 9: Direction split

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Internal waves

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Figure 10: Snapshot

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Figure 11: Effect of coordinates

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Figure 12: An explanation

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Discussion

◮ High-order advection schemes? ◮ The effect of CFL number (edge differencing) ◮ Coordinate choices

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Figure 13: