Spade or Shovel?... Our approach to reducing the complexity and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Spade or Shovel?...

Our approach to reducing the complexity and variation in the chemotherapy journey.

Helen Delimitros Jennifer Todio

1

HIC 2015

About Us – Epworth HealthCare

2

Problems we faced…the why?

3

Managing a Complex Process with Paper Records

4

Managing Variation

5

Managing Disparate Access to Information

6

Pre Project Measures

7

• Clinical experience and feedback
• Riskman Incidents
• Pharmacy Audits
• Manual Chart Audits
• Literature

8

Contrast with Pharmacy Audit - Incident rate of 38 prescribing errors/1000 bed days, compared with 6/1000 reported in Riskman, compared with 0.17/1000 hospital wide!

Higher Incidence Rate for Oncology

9

Oncology Medication Riskman Incidents made up 30% of Total Reported Incidents

Clinical Risk

10

Prescribing errors with the potential to cause harm frequently go undetected. Reported incidents do not reflect the profile of medication errors. Only 1.3% of clinically important prescribing errors with the potential to do patient harm were reported in hospital incident systems.

Paper Chart Audit

• Assessed 100 charts for compliance against

key COSA guidelines

• Patient ID Criteria
• Height/weight/BSA
• Diagnosis
• All drugs ordered
• Administration route and mode
• Prescriber name and signature

11

Audit Findings

12

20 40 60 80 100 120

Paper Chart Compliance %

Site 1 % Site 2 %

Our Vision

13

We wanted the Rainbow

Project Long Term Vision

14

Receives Treatment Summaries; Nursing Care Plans through Document Interface Order received through the ARIA Outbound Order’s Interface – Manual input eliminated Nurse & Pharmacist Review on line EMR

Legend

ARIA Pharmacy Ordering System Changes to Drug Order easily identified One source of truth for drug

• rder

Drug Administration recorded on line and in real time Clinician Places Order using Regimens +/- Other Clinician has real time access to ARIA Patient record Toxicities, Treatment summary recorded Access to Data for Management Reports & Outcome Data

Technology Brief

15

• Connecting the Radiation and Medical

Oncology Records

Technology Brief

16

• Chemotherapy Scheduling, Prescribing and

Clinical Documentation at the Point of Care

• Interfaces with PAS, Radiology and Pathology

Next Challenge…How were we going to approach it? Was it a Job for a Spade or a Shovel?

17

Depends on the job in hand

• Shovels are designed for
• Digging big holes
• Spades are designed for
• Defining edges
• Digging hard ground that

must be moved with substantial force.

18

Anticipated Challenges and Risks

19

• 1. Private Hospital Model –

Sponsorship & Uptake

• 2. Organisational Culture & Staff

Adoption

• 3. Infrastructure & Support

Model

• 4. System Integration

Our Approach

• Started with the “Spade”
• Used to define the edge – lead adopters; build

and refine; allow time for change to sink in;

• Minimised the risk of digging ourselves into a big

hole (delicate nature of the private hospital model; immaturity with large scale IT change)

• Continued with the “Shovel”
• Targeted remaining Oncologists & high Referrers
• 3-4 month roll out

20

Implementation Timeline

21

21-Oct-13 30-Sep-15 01-Jan-14 01-Apr-14 01-Jul-14 01-Oct-14 01-Jan-15 01-Apr-15 01-Jul-15

Feb 14 Scheduling Go-Live Jan 15 5 Oncologists; Pharmacy; Nursing Jun-14 - Jul-14 Planning Next Phase Feb-15 - May-15 Stabilisation/Review phase

Jun - Sep Remaining Oncologists

Aug-15 19 Oncologists

Results/ Outcomes

22

Results: Uptake to Date

23

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

% of Patients with Electronic Chemo Order by Oncologist

Results: Pre and Post

24

Disconnected Records. Difficult to find information. Connected Oncology Record. Fully electronic and indexed.

Pre Post

Regimens prescribed not peer reviewed. 100% of Regimens peer reviewed against standard/s. 100% compliant drug orders. Decision support. Electronic – 1 Version. 19/21 electronic prescribers. Non compliant drug charts. No decision support. Paper (11 Versions of chart); 0/21 electronic prescribers. Handwritten Notes; Illegible; Not easily audited. “Chinese Whispers” … Electronic Notes; Treatment Summary;100% audited. One source of truth.

Results: Oncology Treatment Summary

25

Structured Template – Standardised across sites. Data populates automatically from inputs during Patient Assessment and Treatment.

Results……Requirement for Ongoing Training, QA and Support

26

Reported Incidents to Date…

8 Prescribing errors reported in Riskman for the project sites between Feb – Jun.

• 1 was attributed to using the electronic chemotherapy prescribing

system ARIA

• 7 were due to paper prescribing processes

9 Dispensing errors reported in Riskman between Feb – Jun.

• 1 attributed to an incorrectly configured Regimen (wrong diluent)
• 3 errors prevented by using evidence based regimens in the

electronic ordering system.

27

Too early to accurately measure

Comments from the floor

28

“ This has got lots of good things. I so like it! I’m going to save 10,000 hours from not having to collate data manually for management reports Who thinks this is going to be fantastic?! I do!! It’s really good that I can see the Patient’s appointment for Radiotherapy I don’t want to ever go back to booking in the diary now that I know how to do it in ARIA! “Love the fact that can see the planned treatment dates!” “How good is that!” (Reviewing the diagnosis and results) “Awesome. That’s great!”(Creating the treatment summary)

Images from the floor

29

Images from the floor

30

HD

Conclusion

• While you can manage with only a

spade or shovel, we concluded that our project was successful because we used both.

31

Team Acknowledgments

Phase 2 – Chemo Prescribing

Dr Stephen Vaughan (Lead Oncologist) Dr Y Tran, Dr R Jennens, Dr K Khamly, Dr B Shah, Dr S Kamel (Oncologists) Chris Wall (ITS PM) Andrew Fodor – CIS Linda McGinn, Fran Cotching, Rahni Burleigh & Susan Bourke – Lead Nurses Jennifer Todio – Lead Pharmacist Jonathan Hollis – Communication & Change

32

Phase 1 - Scheduling

Paul Fenton - PM (Clinical) Lindsay Wills (ITS PM) Suzanne Pohlner (Training & Project Support) Jonathan Hollis – Training & Communication Bettina Lijovic – BA

Questions?

Thank you for listening!

…further Questions? Email Helen.Delimitros@epworth.org.au Jennifer.Todio@epworth.org.au

33