Sound Transit 3: Operations and Administration Committee January 7, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Sound Transit 3: Operations and Administration Committee January 7, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Sound Transit 3: Operations and Administration Committee January 7, 2015 ST3 timeline 2 ST Boards Core Priorities for ST3 3 Agenda Overview of LRT Operations Options Overview of R-03: Maintenance Facilities within Draft/Final
ST3 timeline
2
ST Board’s Core Priorities for ST3
3
Agenda
4
- Overview of LRT Operations Options
- Overview of R-03: Maintenance Facilities within Draft/Final
System Plan
- Overview of R-01: ST Express and System Integration
- Next Steps
LRT System Operations Options
5
system
Potential LRT System Operations Option #1
- Everett to Tacoma via Downtown Seattle
Transit Tunnel
- Everett to Downtown Redmond via
Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel
- Ballard to West Seattle at-grade via
Downtown Seattle
Transfer by Walking 3-5 Blocks
6
system
Potential LRT System Operations Option #2
- Everett to Tacoma via Downtown Seattle
Transit Tunnel
- Everett to Downtown Redmond via
Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel
- Ballard to West Seattle via new rail-only
tunnel
7
system
Potential LRT System Operations Option #3
- Everett to West Seattle via Downtown
Seattle Transit Tunnel
- Everett to Downtown Redmond via
Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel
- Ballard to Tacoma via new rail-only tunnel
8
R-03: LRT ST Operations and Maintenance Facilities (OMF)
- ST3 Candidate Projects:
- Included allowance per vehicle towards OMFs
- Based on individual projects
- Draft/Final System Plan:
- Based on system plan as whole
- LRT Starting Assumptions:
- OMF in North
- OMF in South
- OMF for Seattle
- Costs will be shown in System Plan within R-03
9
Overview of R-01: ST Express in ST3 and System Integration
10
ST Express Existing Network
11
- Downtown Seattle-focused network
- Growing ridership & market demand
- 65,000+ average weekday boardings
- Passengers per trip (system average)
- Peak: 47
- Off-peak: 38
- Approximately 750,000 annual service hours
ST Express in 2024 | Network Change
12
- Truncate ST Express service in corridors
served by ST2 Link
- Link primary connection to Downtown Seattle
- Connect ST Express to Link Stations at:
- Lynnwood
- Kent-Des Moines
- Downtown Bellevue/South Bellevue
- University of Washington
- 145th
DRAFT | Initial
estimates subject to revision and refinement
R-01a Maintain Current Service Levels
13
R-01a: Additional 120,000 hours (~610,000)
- All corridors retain current service frequencies
and span of service
- Unchanged passenger capacity
- Potential opportunity for savings following BRT
corridor development
- Limited flexibility for service integration and
expansion into new markets
DRAFT | Initial
estimates subject to revision and refinement
R-01b Improved Service Levels
14
R-01b: Additional 330,000 hours (~820,000)
- Increase frequency to support growing
ridership demand for bus and LRT service
- More corridors with frequent all-day service
- Potential opportunity for savings following BRT
corridor development
- Increased flexibility for service integration and
expansion into new markets
DRAFT | Initial
estimates subject to revision and refinement
15
ST Express in ST 3 | Network and Service Level Scenarios
ST 2 Finance Plan
R-01a
Current Service Levels
R-01b
Improve Service Levels
Network Change Truncation of ST Express in corridors served by Link Truncation of ST Express in corridors served by Link Truncation of ST Express in corridors served by Link Service Levels Reduced frequencies and span of service system-wide Current frequencies and span of service Improved frequencies support connections to Link
R-01
Additional Annual Service Hours
120,000 330,000
Total Annual Service Hours
490,000 610,000 820,000
DRAFT | Initial
estimates subject to revision and refinement
System Integration
16
- December - January
- Coordination with regional partners for early analysis of potential
future ST Express network
- Expand upon ST2 defined bus operations and maintenance needs
- Refinement of bus/rail integration facilities included in ST3
Candidate Projects with transit partners
- February- March
- Phasing of bus network based on development of Draft System Plan
- Completion of Supplemental Transit Service Sheets
- Map showing combined service options
System Integration: Draft Example
17
2 4 S e r v i c e N e t w
- r
k
R e d m
- n
d
- 0- ~ nu.-.-.w.,.
a s _ , .
i
- (
)
- -.1:.tl.l'lk~
·
·w:itioft_
, . . . . . , _ . . 1 1 ' 1 ' 1 1
. . .
' I
~
. . . . . .
" V
- "
" ' ' " " "
- "~ ..........
Q . . . . . .
~
~ . , , , . . ..........
.
~- L
s
- ·
Ch:?sl, i u t i
- n
T l i s S u u n l l T1..r.Sl
t ' . < M 1 ' . l & . l < : i l b : I prvj5.ld. ww
! d
1 : U .
tt:11M.1
E a & . L i r t ; from O . c r i a t r : 7 r a r e . i t C < n : c r t
- d
- M
' l :OMl HKtrtcnd !t w:d
c t
rdldF.
~ k n , , _ . . _ 1 1 " 1 t . n 1 " ' 1 ~Ri..Unu:Jd .ard ci-M . .
~
1~ 1 u
d.P r i
- r
kio linlt Gtte•H-
i i
- n
t
- D
- w
n t
- w
n R . d m
- n
d l'-wdo c a i r c d c m t
- t
g > i ra l
. m
OChc
- =
1
, . _. . , . ~M C ~'«W.:P.
I t : · ~! U ' m l f t l t r 9
W1 1 t U ~
C c f t : l l J O
t
- p
n M d
- carcdcno
r . . m
c t r . . .
- .
«tO
..
'fltb.l:!i!w.SU
- s.M
I J ! M a n l ~
IM!r!8
- i
i
. .
C c f t l l J O t
- pnMdo corw:cciono t;:m ctr...-.
llf!dmnnd ~ H e . l ! r ( ) ' e P . t b-M I~ l ) t ! '•rrl
; m t J Ii;:
! , l
! e-....er :Jo
M 1 b M ' 1
&-.:lk
iitl:!W via 3.R..-520
CurnllM.:liot1
V t . ' 1 1 1 1 R1:fYi
u 1 . . t T 1 ¥
i h >
r t . . c a n
- n
d Ce; r t ' a l Connector . , , I I
p r
- v
i d e
a c
- nneet.«1
f r
- m
Oo,,1rtowr R e d n•:in:I Link t
- t
h :
~ r r r n ¥ " i shRivsr - rail and :he 520 T rai
Current Service Network
I
I
system
- January 21, 2016
– Letter to jurisdictions/partners requesting acknowledgement of project scopes and comments; Responses requested by January 21, 2016
- March 2016: Draft System Plan
- April 2016: Public and Stakeholder Outreach
- June 2016: Potential adoption of Final System Plan
Next Steps
18