Some FoibleS oF the Scholarly communication ProceSS John hn M - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Some FoibleS oF the Scholarly communication ProceSS

John hn M M. . Budd dd

Univ niversity o y of f Mis issouri

DieDerik a. StaPel

breaking newS

Benedict C Care

• arey. F

Frau raud c cas ase seen as as a a re red d flag f ag for r psycho chology gy r research.

• ch. New Yor
• rk T

Times, N Nov

• v. 2

. 2, 2011. Jelte te M.

• M. Wic

Wicherts: “Dr : “Dr. . St Stape apel was able to to op

• perate

te for

• r s

so

• long
• ng.

. . . . . Beca cause h he was ‘ ‘lor

• rd of
• f th

the data ta,’ th the onl

• nly p

person

• n who
• saw th

the exp xperimenta tal evidence th that h t had b been g n gath thered (or (or fabricate ted)”

more obServ ationS

Jen ennifer Cro rocker a and d M. Ly Lynne e Coope per.

• r. 2

2011. Add ddres essing s scien entific f fra raud.

• d. Sc

Science, 3 334, 1 , 1182 82. APA be began n us using ing a an n ele lectr tronic ma manus nuscript t ma mana nagement nt sys yste tem in in 2003. Betw tween th n then n and nd 2011 St Stap apel submitt ubmitted 40 manus nuscrip ipts; 24 w were a accepte ted and 16 w were reje

• rejected. Gi

Given en t the he number er of edi editors and d rev reviewer ewers hand ndli ling ng th the ma manus nuscrip ipts, “it “it would uld be be almo lmost imp t impossibl ible to to d dete tect t a patte ttern n of d f data ta fa fabr bric icati tion. n.”

interim rePort: tilburg univerSity

Includ ludes St Stape apel’s wo work rk at at Tilburg, as as we well as as at at the he Uni University ty of

• f Amste

terdam and nd th the Uni niversity of

• f

Groni ninge ngen. n. Found t that hat was was gu guilty o

• f fab

abricating an and d mas assag aging g dat data o

• ver a

r a long g pe peri riod o

• f time an

and i d in much of hi his pu published wo work rk.

backgrounD (through 2012)

Publication History: 1994-present

• No. of Articles (Scopus): 121
• No. of Citations (Scopus): 1,750
• No. of Retracted Articles: 54

Screen Shot oF retraction

Some citation Data

Total Citations to Stapel Articles (20 0 0 -20 0 6 , n=29): 8 73 Substantive Citations: 320 (Substantive self-citations: 10 6) Tacit Citations: 4 0 2 (Tacit self-citations: 71) Not available for analysis: 151

SubStantive

“A coope pera rativ tive o

• ri

rienta ntatio tion a n acti tivate tes an n inte ntegra ratio tion mi n minds ndset tha t that t leads ds to to assimila imilatio tion i n in n po point nts w witho thout c t cong ngru ruenc nce ye yet t esta tablis lishe hed d (Sta Stape pel and Ko Koome men, 2005) 2005), which r reduces t the like keliho lihood o d of conf nflic icts ts.”

Hoffm ffmann, A A.O.I. I.,Pennin ings gs, J , J.M.E. E., a , and Wi Wies es, S.

• S. 2011.

2011. Re Relat lationship m mar arketin ing’s r role le in in man anagin aging t the fir irm-inve vestor dy dyad. d. Jour urnal o l of Bus usin iness Re Resear arch, 64 64, 898. 898.

• F greater concern

Leslie K.

• K. Jo

John hn, G Georg rge Loewen enstei tein, a and d Dra Drazen Prel elec ec (Psychol

• log
• gical S

l Science, 2 , 23, 2012 2012, 524 524-32. 32. (Surv urvey o

• f

f 2, 2,00 000 ps psycho chologists) “[T]he p e preval alen ence o e of [questi tionab able resear arch pra pract ctices] ra raises que uestions a abo bout ut t the he cre credi dibility o

• f

f re researc rch fi findings and d thre hreatens re researc rch i integr grity by by pro produ ducing un unre realistically e elegant re resul ults t tha hat ma may be be di difficult t to ma match ch without enga gaging i in such uch pra pract ctices

• neself.”

.”

Jama requirementS

JAMA de deman mands spe s specific r repo porting b by authors:

• rs:

ht http: p://jama. ama.jam amanetwork. k.com/d m/dat ata/i a/ifora- forms ms/j /jam ama/au /auinst_c _crit.pdf

LPU LPU

Slicing it uP

reFinetti (1990)

“A “Although it may may se seem m unimp mportant at at fi first st si sight ht, t the he pu publication o

• f

f smal small u units make makes i s it mu much e easi asier fo for the he reade ader t to organ anize hi his/ s/her dat datab

• abase. Qu

Quan anta o

• f

f sc scientifi fic info format ation ar are mu much mo h more e easi asily st stored an and d retrieved. . . . . than han mo more c compl mplex u units s

• f
• f inform

rmation

• n.”

.”

biomeDical literature

Issu Issues o s of f JAMA an and t d the he New E w Englan and Jou

• urn

rnal of

• f Med

edicine (2011) we were exam

• amined. A

Autho hors’ fu fundi ding fr from N m NIH IH was was recorded.

• d. That

That same same gran ant fo for eac ach au autho hor was was se sear arched i in MEDLIN LINE.

PublicationS noting the Same grant

Auth thor #1 4 #2 4 #3 7 #4 7 #5 7 #6 10 #7 10

cont.

Auth thor #8 11 #9 17 #10 17 #11 23 #12 32 #13 42

Wha What’ t’s wron wrong wi with th thi this pi pictu cture re?