Som e thoughts on the possible benefits of using VirLaBoK for GI - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Som e thoughts on the possible benefits of using VirLaBoK for GI - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Som e thoughts on the possible benefits of using VirLaBoK for GI teaching design and GI course finding 06 July 2016, Frans I. Rip Triggers for the thoughts? Triggers GI-N2K wp1 results (supply vs. demand of GI teaching):
Triggers for the ‘thoughts’?
Triggers
- GI-N2K wp1 results (supply vs. demand of GI teaching):
- Un-harmonized GI course descriptions (supply side)
and learning needs (demand side)
- Little awareness of GI Body of Knowledge
- BoKOnto version of GI Body of Knowledge created in US
- Looking for a course about Linked Data basics: not easy
- Data Quality, fitness-for-use perspective: tell me what I
need to know
- Existence of Booking.com for hotel accommodation:
applicable to teaching offers?
2
My objective
- Make it easier to find GI teaching offers
- Promote the use of a standard to describe GI-teaching to
improve comparability
- Promote a tool for that: the Curriculum Design Tool
- Support the EU objective to look abroad for learning
3
Idea: GI course portal website
- If: Wide use of Curriculum Design Tool
- Then: Many harmonized GI course descriptions
- If also mentioned for each course:
- Language(s) of instruction
- E-learning available ( e.g. MOOC)
- Organisational details (e.g. ECTS, EQF
, fee, timetable)
- Then: Teaching offers might attract participants from
abroad
- All this could be presented on a portal website
4
Example
- Good
enough?
6
Questions
Exam ple good enough?
- Organisational aspects: present
- Course content description: No use of GI BoK concepts
- Completeness: limited (focus seems to be on oil
exploration domain, Salzburg GI teaching not mentioned)
6
So: Example is not yet perfect for the GI domain. Assuming the query was OK, the data must be the problem
Course names from 2014 survey
selection from 230 entries: less informative names
Community Expert program Cursd Expert Universitarien SIG Curso de Postgrado Aplicacindelos SIG en Arqueologa Einfuhrung in GIS Experto GIS ArcGIs gv SIGQGIS Geoweb nouveaux enjeux nouveaux usages GERI2 GIS und Geodatenbanken Grundlagen der Geoinformatik Ingénieur Agronome specialisation agrogéomatique Methods and Techniques Basic Advanced Midden kader functionaris Landmeten nbmb Ruimtelijke informatiekunde 1 data en cartografie SIG AVANZADO SISGEO-INFO Techniki Pozyskiwania Danych Obrazowych TSSIG Technicien Supérieur en SIG Umwelt-und Geoinformations systeme
7
Better data
W hich details of any teaching offer does GI need? 2 reference models are relevant:
- For organisational aspects: Metadata for Learning
Opportunities
- For GI domain content: GI-BoK, latest version
8
Organisational Reference: Metadata for Learning Opportunities
ftp://ftp.cenorm.be/PUBLIC/CWAs/e- Europe/WS-LT/CWA15903-00-2008-Dec.pdf
9 Missing: teaching type (online, instructor led) ......
Content Reference 1
American development: BoKOnto
H http: / / gistbok.org/ bokwiki/ index.html DiBiase et al., 2006 Ahearn & Skupin, 2015
10
Content Reference 2
11
European development
H GI-N2K prj: Virtual Lab for the BoK DiBiase et al., 2006 Hossain, 2014
Based on Am. developments
12
The GI-N2K VirLaBoK work produced the Curriculum Design Tool
Version: June 14, 2016
Search and result
If descriptions of GI teaching offers were based on the mentioned data models, looking for GI courses might be like this:
Search for a GI course Found GI courses:
Filter on these values:
Subject GI -BoK tags 1 . Course title + description Teaching Level EQF level
GI -BoK tags EQF level ECTS size
Study load ECTS credits
- Org. nam e
Language tag( s) Teaching Place
Teaching Org. Type Univ., Coll., SME
Tim etable
- Dist. Learning Y/ N
Course fee
Teaching Language Language code Fee € range class 2 . Course title + description Starting Date Month / Year
GI -BoK tags EQF level ECTS size
Teaching Type Class / Online
- Org. nam e
Language tag( s) Teaching Place Tim etable
- Dist. Learning Y/ N
Course fee
3 . Course title + description
13
Portal website
Ideal: Each course provider publishes
course data, in accordance with the ref. models for org. and content, on a website. At least in CSV-format ( open data) Better: as Linked Data in a SPARQL db
- n URI ( )
The course data is not in one big central db, but stays at the home website. The Portal website facilitates to query all course provider web sites and show all results found at those websites.
Fictional data link example: < http: / / x.org/ 2016# Edu> < http: / / MLO.org/ def# offer> < http: / / MLO.org/ LO# GIScourse> 14
Happy course seeker
!
15