Solution of Linear Nonhomogeneous Recurrence Relations
Ioan Despi
despi@turing.une.edu.au
University of New England
September 25, 2013
Solution of Linear Nonhomogeneous Recurrence Relations Ioan Despi - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Solution of Linear Nonhomogeneous Recurrence Relations Ioan Despi despi@turing.une.edu.au University of New England September 25, 2013 Outline 1 A Case for Thought 2 Method of Undetermined Coefficients Notes Examples Ioan Despi AMTH140
University of New England
September 25, 2013
1 A Case for Thought 2 Method of Undetermined Coefficients
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 2 of 16
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 3 of 16
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 3 of 16
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 3 of 16
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 3 of 16
◮ In other words, it can’t be a particular solution of the nonhomogeneous
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 3 of 16
1 10.
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 4 of 16
q
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 5 of 16
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 6 of 16
k
i=0
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 6 of 16
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 7 of 16
◮
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 7 of 16
◮
◮ nM , which is a necessary adjustment for the case when µ, appearing in
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 7 of 16
◮
◮ nM , which is a necessary adjustment for the case when µ, appearing in
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 7 of 16
j=0 Ajnj)︂
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 8 of 16
j=0 Ajnj)︂
◮ If we rewrite ˜
j=M Ajnj + µn ∑︁M−1 j=0 Ajnj, then
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 8 of 16
j=0 Ajnj)︂
◮ If we rewrite ˜
j=M Ajnj + µn ∑︁M−1 j=0 Ajnj, then
⋆ the first part is essentially (* * *), while Ioan Despi – AMTH140 8 of 16
j=0 Ajnj)︂
◮ If we rewrite ˜
j=M Ajnj + µn ∑︁M−1 j=0 Ajnj, then
⋆ the first part is essentially (* * *), while ⋆ the second part is just a solution of the homogeneous problem. Ioan Despi – AMTH140 8 of 16
j=0 Ajnj)︂
◮ If we rewrite ˜
j=M Ajnj + µn ∑︁M−1 j=0 Ajnj, then
⋆ the first part is essentially (* * *), while ⋆ the second part is just a solution of the homogeneous problem. ◮ It is however obvious that vn in (∗ ∗ ∗) is simpler than ˜
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 8 of 16
9 of 16
◮ Let ∆, f(λ) and Ps(λ) be defined in the same way as we did in the
9 of 16
◮ Let ∆, f(λ) and Ps(λ) be defined in the same way as we did in the
◮ Recall that (∗) can be written as f(∆)an = g(n) and (∗∗) implies
9 of 16
◮ Let ∆, f(λ) and Ps(λ) be defined in the same way as we did in the
◮ Recall that (∗) can be written as f(∆)an = g(n) and (∗∗) implies
1
9 of 16
◮ Let ∆, f(λ) and Ps(λ) be defined in the same way as we did in the
◮ Recall that (∗) can be written as f(∆)an = g(n) and (∗∗) implies
1
2
9 of 16
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 10 of 16
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 10 of 16
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 10 of 16
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 10 of 16
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 10 of 16
2 , a2 = −5 , a3 = − 31 2 .
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 11 of 16
2 , a2 = −5 , a3 = − 31 2 .
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 11 of 16
2 , a2 = −5 , a3 = − 31 2 .
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 11 of 16
2 , a2 = −5 , a3 = − 31 2 .
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 11 of 16
2 , a2 = −5 , a3 = − 31 2 .
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 11 of 16
2 , a2 = −5 , a3 = − 31 2 .
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 12 of 16
2 , a2 = −5 , a3 = − 31 2 .
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 12 of 16
2 , a2 = −5 , a3 = − 31 2 .
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 13 of 16
2 , a2 = −5 , a3 = − 31 2 .
2 .
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 13 of 16
2 , a2 = −5 , a3 = − 31 2 .
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 14 of 16
2 , a2 = −5 , a3 = − 31 2 .
3
3
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 14 of 16
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 15 of 16
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 15 of 16
1(b1n + b0) + µn 2c0 and µ2 = 1
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 15 of 16
1(b1n + b0) + µn 2c0 and µ2 = 1
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 15 of 16
n
i=0
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 16 of 16
n
i=0
n
i=0
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 16 of 16
n
i=0
n
i=0
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 16 of 16
n
i=0
n
i=0
Ioan Despi – AMTH140 16 of 16