SOLID XENON AS THE PATH TO THE NEUTRINO FLOOR SCOTT KRAVITZ , PETER - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

solid xenon as the path to the neutrino floor
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

SOLID XENON AS THE PATH TO THE NEUTRINO FLOOR SCOTT KRAVITZ , PETER - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SOLID XENON AS THE PATH TO THE NEUTRINO FLOOR SCOTT KRAVITZ , PETER SORENSEN, SCOTT HASELSCHWARDT, MATTHEW FORMAN LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LAB CPAD WORKSHOP, DEC 8 2019 Where will dark matter direct detection be in 2025? Either:


slide-1
SLIDE 1

SOLID XENON AS THE PATH TO THE NEUTRINO FLOOR

SCOTT KRAVITZ, PETER SORENSEN, SCOTT HASELSCHWARDT, MATTHEW FORMAN LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LAB

CPAD WORKSHOP, DEC 8 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Where will dark matter direct detection be in 2025?

  • Either:
  • no evidence for WIMPs
  • a hint of WIMPs
  • a handful of WIMPs
  • But must reach the neutrino floor:
  • A G3 (i.e. 20+ tonne) xenon TPC

would require a lot of:

  • time (10+ years)
  • money ($200+ M)
  • Not obvious this is the best path

Figure from LZ: arXiv:1802.06039

Scott Kravitz (LBNL) / CPAD Workshop / 8 Dec 2019

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

1100 BG events 800 from Rn 200 from solar nu <1 atm. nu 40 8B nu w/ 99.5% ER/NR discrimination, 4 of 6 bkg events from Rn Figure from LZ: arXiv:1802.06039 Internal backgrounds !!

Limitations from LZ backgrounds

Scott Kravitz (LBNL) / CPAD Workshop / 8 Dec 2019

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Run LZ for longer?

Doesn’t work. Backgrounds win, mostly radon

Figure from LZ TDR arXiv:1703.09144

Scott Kravitz (LBNL) / CPAD Workshop / 8 Dec 2019

4

Neutrino floor (40 GeV)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Get better at radon reduction?

Active area of R&D. HARD.

LZ plot: arXiv:1802.06039 XENON1T prediction: arXiv:1512.07501 XENON1T actual: arXiv:1805.12562

XENON1T prediction w/o cryogenic distillation (dash) and measured w/ cryogenic distillation (shaded)

Scott Kravitz (LBNL) / CPAD Workshop / 8 Dec 2019

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Solution: CrystaLiZe

  • Freeze LZ:

Radon emanated from surfaces now excluded from solid bulk

  • In a crystal, radon decay

daughters would stay at the same (x,y,z) as the parent, enabling tagging/veto

  • DAMIC has used this trick in Si

arXiv:1506.02562

arXiv:1410.6496

Scott Kravitz (LBNL) / CPAD Workshop / 8 Dec 2019

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Rn daughter tagging

218Po

3.1 min

α 214Pb

26.8 min

β 214Bi

19.9 min

β 214Po

164 us

α This is an easy sequence to tag if all the decays happen in exactly the same spot in a low-background instrument (similar situation for 220Rn chain) Identify Veto

Scott Kravitz (LBNL) / CPAD Workshop / 8 Dec 2019

7 Primary culprit from Rn bkgs

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Radon tagging by the numbers

  • In LZ, Rn emanates into the

liquid and flows in to the bulk

  • In crystaLiZe, Rn would emanate

into the bulk for O(100) days while the crystal is growing; then, Rn in bulk target would be fixed and decay away

from Table III arXiv:1802.06039

same LZ emanation and dust assumptions

(vetoed) (vetoed*)

crystaLiZe

Scott Kravitz (LBNL) / CPAD Workshop / 8 Dec 2019

8

222Rn half-life

(3.8 day)

210Pb half-life

(22.2 year)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Two slopes towards discovery

  • a crystalline xenon TPC

(“crystaLiZe”) would progress along the first slope for longer

Figure from LZ TDR arXiv:1703.09144

crystaLiZe LZ

Scott Kravitz (LBNL) / CPAD Workshop / 8 Dec 2019

9

Neutrino floor (40 GeV)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

crystaLiZe looks technically feasible

  • Solid and liquid xenon have

similar physical properties

  • Solid xenon emission TPC is

expected to perform as well as a liquid xenon emission TPC

  • band gap (hence W-value)
  • electron mobility (doubled)
  • electron emission
  • density (20% bonus!)
  • high voltage **
  • Similar scintillation signal
  • bserved in solid and liquid
  • cf. arXiv:1410.6496 and

arXiv:1508.05903

Phys Rev B 10 4464 (1974) JETP 55 860 (1982)

Scott Kravitz (LBNL) / CPAD Workshop / 8 Dec 2019

10 e- emission Solid Xe Liquid Xe

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Technical Challenges

  • Single e- sensitivity?
  • Retaining high purity while

crystallizing

  • likely requiring elevated

temperature bakeout

  • would take multiple months

to crystallize LZ w/o defects

  • Precise temperature gradients

require more elaborate control/measurement of T

  • R&D: use small scale

crystalline Xe TPC test bed to gauge performance

arXiv:1410.6496

Scott Kravitz (LBNL) / CPAD Workshop / 8 Dec 2019

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Test Bed Design

Scott Kravitz (LBNL) / CPAD Workshop / 8 Dec 2019

12

  • Two phase Xe mini-TPC
  • ~500 g Xe when full
  • S1 and S2 readout:

SiPM arrays (4 top, 4 bottom)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Why SiPMs?

Bottom SiPM array (from above)

Scott Kravitz (LBNL) / CPAD Workshop / 8 Dec 2019

13

  • Compact – less Xe needed
  • No vacuum space – no structural

concerns, esp. during freezing

  • QE extends to deeper-UV light

that may be present in ice Single dark counts Double dark counts Noise

slide-14
SLIDE 14

TPC Tests

  • Observe S1s and S2s in Xe
  • Clear indications of freezing:
  • Vapor pressure below triple point
  • Drift time halves

Scott Kravitz (LBNL) / CPAD Workshop / 8 Dec 2019

14 External 232Th source in LXe External 232Th source in SXe S1 S2

slide-15
SLIDE 15

CRYSTALIZE: SUMMARY

  • Performance of large Xe detectors expected to be limited by Rn before

reaching the neutrino floor

  • CrystaLiZe is a logical upgrade path for LZ to reach the neutrino floor

(+solar neutrino science), if it works

  • Near future: establish if crystalline xenon emission TPC maintains all the

benefits of the liquid xenon emission TPC neutrino floor radon rug

Scott Kravitz (LBNL) / CPAD Workshop / 8 Dec 2019

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

EXTRA SLIDES FOLLOW

Scott Kravitz (LBNL) / CPAD Workshop / 8 Dec 2019

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Test Bed Design

Scott Kravitz (LBNL) / CPAD Workshop / 8 Dec 2019

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

LXe convection ~6 cm/min i.e. too fast

  • Phys. Rev. D 95, 072008 (2017)

Scott Kravitz (LBNL) / CPAD Workshop / 8 Dec 2019

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Sorensen, PhD Thesis (2008)

Operation of a crystalline Xe TPC

Scott Kravitz (LBNL) / CPAD Workshop / 8 Dec 2019

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

LZ Backgrounds

Scott Kravitz (LBNL) / CPAD Workshop / 8 Dec 2019

20 arxiv:1802.06039

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Scott Kravitz (LBNL) / CPAD Workshop / 8 Dec 2019

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Scott Kravitz (LBNL) / CPAD Workshop / 8 Dec 2019

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Scott Kravitz (LBNL) / CPAD Workshop / 8 Dec 2019

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Scott Kravitz (LBNL) / CPAD Workshop / 8 Dec 2019

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

PREVIOUS WORK

  • 1. arXiv:1410.6496 and arXiv:1508.05903
  • optical photon collection comparison to liquid — mild decrease
  • charge drift comparison to liquid — factor x2 faster
  • 2. solid xenon bolometers (2013, Drexel)

Scott Kravitz (LBNL) / CPAD Workshop / 8 Dec 2019

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Old Paradigm

20-50 tonne liquid xenon TPC LUX LZ

Scott Kravitz (LBNL) / CPAD Workshop / 8 Dec 2019

26