SOCIO IOECONOMIC IC, A ANTHROPOMETRIC ETRIC A AND BEH - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

socio ioeconomic ic a anthropometric etric a and beh
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

SOCIO IOECONOMIC IC, A ANTHROPOMETRIC ETRIC A AND BEH - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SOCIO IOECONOMIC IC, A ANTHROPOMETRIC ETRIC A AND BEH BEHAVIORAL D DIM IMENS ENSIONS OF OF PRE-DIAB IABETES ETES IN A AUCKLAND AND Hannah Chisholm, in collaboration with the PREVIEW:NZ team OUTLINE Background und: o obe


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

SOCIO IOECONOMIC IC, A ANTHROPOMETRIC ETRIC A AND BEH BEHAVIORAL D DIM IMENS ENSIONS OF OF PRE-DIAB IABETES ETES IN A AUCKLAND AND

Hannah Chisholm, in collaboration with the PREVIEW:NZ team

slide-3
SLIDE 3

OUTLINE

  • Background

und: o

  • be

besity, pred ediabetes es and and d dia iabetes in in New Z w Zeala land

  • Overvie

iew o

  • f t

the P PREVIEW T Trial ial

  • Outl

tlin ine o

  • f m

my r ration tional ale a and h hypo poth these ses

  • Meth

thods

  • Summary s

statistic atistics

  • Prelim

imin inar ary f findin ings

  • Conc

nclus usion

PREVIEW

slide-4
SLIDE 4

OBES

BESITY IN NEW EW ZEALAND EALAND

1/3, 1 1/3, 1 1/3

37 28 35

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

NZ Ministry of Health Men & Women; All ethnicities

% of popn Overweight Obese Lean

http://www.health.govt.nz/publication/health-new-zealand-adults-2011-12

2nd

nd in

n OECD CD

slide-5
SLIDE 5

PREDIABETES AND OBESITY IN NEW ZEALAND

  • Obesity/overweight A

AND diabetes

  • Obese g

grou

  • ups w

within New Z Zealand ha have hi highe her r rates of

  • f prediabetes and

nd diabetes ( (Cop

  • ppell, 2013)
  • Rec

ecent es estimates o

  • f d

diabetes pr prevalen ence 7% and pr pre-diab iabetes p preval alenc nce 18.2% ( % (Cop

  • ppell, 2

2013) )

  • Diabetes a

and nd prediabetes par artic icularly p prevalent in in Mao aori i an and P Pac acif ific peo peopl ples (C (Cop

  • ppell, 20

2013)

  • 1/

1/4 4 of in indiv ividuals w wit ith predia iabetes deve velo lop diabetes ( (Knowle wler, 2002; 2002; Lindstrom

  • m, 2003;

2003; Tuomile lehto, 2003; 2003; Nathan, 200 2007) 7)

  • This

s progre ressi ssion i is amenab nable to weight lo loss s in interventio ion

slide-6
SLIDE 6

PREVIEW: PREVENTION OF DIABETES THROUGH LIFESTYLE INTERVENTION IN NEW ZEALAND, AUSTRALIA AND EUROPE

  • Multinational c

l clinical t l trial

  • $1

$10 0 million fu funding fr from

  • m E

Europ

  • pean U

Union

  • n
  • 2,

2,500 a 500 adults a and chi children

  • Aim

Aims t to in inform polic icy an and c clin inical al recommendations f for d diab iabetes preventio ion

  • Lar

argest w weig ight l loss an and diab iabetes p prevention trial ial in internatio ionally over the nex ext f few ew y years

  • Most ef

efficacious diet a and exer ercise pa patterns f for pr preven enting diabetes thr hrou

  • ugh long t

ter erm m wei eight ma mainten enance

PREVIEW

Prevention of diabetes in New Zealand, Australia and Europe

slide-7
SLIDE 7

PREVIEW:NZ TEAM

Professor Sally D Poppitt Dr Anne-Thea McGill Dr Marta Silvestre, Hannah Chisholm Wonjoo Lee, Amy Liu

slide-8
SLIDE 8

RATIONALE FOR PREVIEW

  • Positive effect of weight loss o
  • n metab

abolic heal alth Large ge body dy of eviden dence t e to s support the e effec ect of w wei eigh ght loss in lowering plas asma a glucose levels ls in in o

  • besit

ity relat ated ad adverse metab aboli lic states (Knowler, W

W., ., Barrett, E., ., Fowler, S., ., Ham amman man, R R., ., Lachli lin, J J., ., Walker, E E., N ., Nathan, , D., 2 ., 2002; Maruth thur et a al., ., 2013; 13; Katula la et a al., ., 2013; ; Allende- Vigo go, , 2011; B ; Bergman, , 2012; G Gillett et a al., ., 20 2012 12; Mout utzouri, , Tsimihod

  • dimos
  • s,

, Ri Rizos, , & & Elisaf, , 201 011; Yates, D , Davies es, & & Khunt nti, , 2009; 2009; Ratne ner & & Sat athas asivam am, 2 201 011)

  • Protein

in o

  • r c

carbohyd ydrat ate for weight loss and maintenan ance

  • Diogen

genes s study dy (Larsen

en et et al., 201 010) vs

vs Fin innish Diab abetes Pr Prevention Study y (Lind

ndstrom, J., Louh uheranta, A A., ., Manne nnelin, M , M., ., Ras astas as, M M., ., Salmi minen, V V., ., Eriksso sson, J J., Tuomi mileh ehto, J J., 2003) 2003)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

A STUDY WITHIN A STUDY

Adver erti tisement t Rec ecruitm tment t Screeni ning a g and nd

base seli line

Low Energy Diet et (LED) D) (8 weeks)

Weight M Maint ntena nance Through D Diet a t and nd Exer ercise ( (148 w week eeks) PREVIEW Trial My Study

slide-10
SLIDE 10

PRE-DIABETES? (IMPAIRED FASTING GLUCOSE AND/OR IMPARIED GLUCOSE TOLERANCE)

Fasting: Normal b blood d gluco cose le levels: s: 3.9-5.5 mmo mmol/L /L Predia iabetic glu lucose se le levels s (impaired fa fasting g glucos

  • se)

) : 5. 5.6 t 6 to 6.

  • 6.9

9 mmo mmol/L /L Diabe betic g glu lucose se le levels: : ≥7.0 mmo mmol/L /L Post O Ora ral l Glu lucose se ( (OGTT): Normal l blood g d gluco cose l levels: : ≤ 7.8 mmo mmol/L /L Predia iabetic glu lucose se le levels s (im impair ired glucos

  • se t

tolerance) ) : : 7.8-11.1 .1 mmo mmol/L /L Diabetic glu lucose se leve vels ls: : ≥11.2mmol/L World Health Organisation, 2006

slide-11
SLIDE 11

RATIONALE: WHY ARE SOICODOMOGRAPHIC, BEHAVIOURAL AND ANTHROMOMETIRC DIMENSIONS IMPORTANT?

Bi Biology gy: ap appetite an and f food as as a a potential ally ad addictive s substan ance Soc

  • cial a

and phys ysical e environment: OBESOGENIC IC Sub uboptimal d diet and nd ph physical a activity Obe besit ity Obesity y related pre-diabet etes es Diabet etes es

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Diab abetes i is D DIFFI FFICULT a and Sneaky aky

Diab iabetes is is VERY Expensive for t the He Heal alth C Car are Sys ystem

Diabe betes h has L Large rge Person sonal a and F Famil ilial ial C Costs sts

Prediab diabetes ≠ Diab Diabetes

slide-13
SLIDE 13

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

1.

  • 1. Whi

hich h charac acterist stics s (so socio ioeconomic mic and d ethnic icit ity, anthropo pometry, eati ting behavio iours) pu put in indi dividu duals at at increase ased r d risk sk o

  • f prediab

diabetes in n Auckl ckland?

2. . Is a a controlle lled, sho hort t term low energy diet a potentially f feasible m method

  • d t

to

  • reduce

at risk i k individuals ls risk k of type 2 diabetes m mellitus i in A Auckla land ( (prior to the 3 year diet and e exerci cise coaching) s ) study?

  • 3. Which char

arac acteristics ar are e as associated ed wi with gr great eater er w wei eigh ght loss an and lower er OGGT results s after a a low w en ener ergy gy d diet?

slide-14
SLIDE 14

WHICH CHARACTERISTICS PUT INDIVIDUALS AT INCREASED RISK OF PREDIABETES IN AUCKLAND? : HYPOTHESES

BMI SES ES Ethn Ethnicit ity Eatin Eating behavio viour

slide-15
SLIDE 15

STUDY DESIGN

Cross S Sectio ional nal S Study: y: Sociode demographic Anthropo pome metr tric & & Metaboli lic marke kers At b baseli line Intervent ntio ion: n: We Weight lo loss o s over r an 8 n 8 week eek perio iod o

  • n a

a LE LED ( (lo low w en ener ergy d diet)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

At Least st 8% W Weight loss r

  • ss required

¼ of the ty f the typic ical in intak take 3386 386KJ

slide-17
SLIDE 17

VARIABLES OF INTEREST

ANTH THROMETR ETRY Body w weight ( ght (base seline and post post L LED ED) BMI (bod

  • dy m

mass ss index) ( (base seline and post L LED) Waist st c circumfere rence ( (base seline an and post L LED) BODY C Y COMPO POSTION DEXA DEXA ( (dual x-ray a absorpti tiometr try) ( (base seline and post L LED) EATIN ING B BEHAVIO IOUR Eating b behavi vior

  • rs measu

sure red b by the t three f factor e

  • r eating quest

stion

  • nnaire

re (base seline) Demo mographics & SOC OCIOE IOECON ONOM OMICS Are rea b base sed soc socioeconomic d depr privation ( (base seline) VERSUS US METABOLI OLIC o

  • r PreDi

Diabetes Fast sting p plasm sma g glucos

  • se OGTT

TT (base seline and post L LED) Po Post oral al plasm sma g glucose

  • se O

OGTT ( TT (baseline)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

METHODS

QUESTIONNAIRES BLOOD ANALYSIS ANTHROPOMETRY TFEQ Prescreening Post oral plasma glucose Fasting plasma glucose BMI Weight DEXA Waist

slide-19
SLIDE 19

468 Respondents 257 Not Yet Assessed 107 screened 62 Ineligible 45 Eligible and enrolled 3 Withdrawal 42 Low Energy Diet 3 Withdrawal ? Successful Completion (~60%) ?Unsuccessful

slide-20
SLIDE 20

468 Respondents 257 Not Yet Assessed 107 screened 62 Ineligible 45 Eligible and enrolled 3 Withdrawal 42 Low Energy Diet 3 Withdrawal ? Successful Completion ~60% Normoglyceamic Abnormal ECG Prediabetic

slide-21
SLIDE 21

SUMMARY STATISTICS: WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE?

Characteristic Normogly lyceamic Predia iabetic Age 47.3 47.2 Gender 81% Female 73% Female Ethnicity 67% NZEuropean 12% PI 53% NZEuropean 24% PI Area based socioeconomic status 3 (NZDep06 quintile) 3.2 (NZDep06 Quintile) BMI 38 kg/m2 (class 2 obesity) 38 kg/m2 (class 2 obesity) Weight 108kg 110kg Fasting Plasma Glucose 5.1 mmol/L 5.8 mmol/L Post Oral Plasma Glucose 5.7 mmol/L 6.6 mmol/L

slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23

WHICH CHARACTERISTICS PUT INDIVIDUALS AT INCREASED RISK OF PREDIABETES IN AUCKLAND: BMI

One w way y ANOVA of

  • f BMI c

I categor

  • ries (overweight,

, ob

  • bese c

class 1, , ob

  • bese c

class 2 2, ,

  • bes

ese c e clas ass 3) an and f fas asting g plas asma a gl glucose an and p post o

  • ral

al p plas asma gl a glucose e le levels

  • ls. No signi

nificant nt r relations nship b p between n blood gluc ucose ( (at fasting and po post oral) ) and B BMI. I. In Independent s samples T-test of

  • f BMI

I between No Normo mogl glyceam eamic an and Predia iabe betic ic groups

  • ps. No

No signi nificant nt relations nship b p between n blood gluc ucose ( (at fasting a g and po post oral) ) and d BMI c I categor

  • ry.
slide-24
SLIDE 24

BUT… A SIGNIFICANT CORRELATION BETWEEN PERCENT BODY FAT (DEXA) AND POST ORAL PLASMA GLUCOSE (R2=0.28) (P=0.000)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

WHICH CHARACTERISTICS PUT INDIVIDUALS AT INCREASED RISK OF PREDIABETES IN AUCKLAND: SES

One way A y ANOVA t to

  • te

test the d differences i in socioecono nomic status us in relation to fa fasting and nd po post oral pl plasma g gluc

  • ucose. No signi

nificant nt d differenc nce f foun und Independ ndent nt samp mples t t-test to to compar are e the ar e area b ea bas ased ed socioecono nomic s status us between prediabet etic an and normogl glycea eami mic groups

  • ps. There was n

no s signi nificant nt differenc nce i in t the area based socioecono nomic status us scores for predia iabe betic and d normo mogl glyceamic groups ups.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

BUT.. CORRELATION: INCREASING BMI WAS SEEN WITH INCREASING NZDEP06 DECILE (R2=0.05) (P= 0.000)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

WHICH CHARACTERISTICS PUT INDIVIDUALS AT INCREASED RISK OF PREDIABETES IN AUCKLAND: ETHNICITY

One way A y ANOVA t to

  • test the d

differences i in ethnic icit ity* in n relation to fasting and nd po post oral al plas asma gl a glucose.

  • e. No signi

nificant nt d differenc nce foun und

*Ethnicity o

  • utput a

and a analysi sis u s usi sing mu multiple r respo sponse se

slide-28
SLIDE 28

WHICH CHARACTERISTICS PUT INDIVIDUALS AT INCREASED RISK OF PREDIABETES IN AUCKLAND: EATING BEHAVIOUR: EMOTIONAL EATING

Emo motional al E Eat ating w g was as correl elated ed wi with post pran andial al p plas asma a gl glucose.

  • e. I

Increa easing g tendency towards e emotion

  • nal e

eating w was cor

  • rrelated w

with higher BMI I (n=45) (r=0.09) 09) (p=0.05) 05)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

SUMMARY OF PRELIMINARY FINDINGS: LED INTERVENTION

  • Total of 267

f 267.4 kg g lost

  • Average of
  • f 8.6

.6 kg per person

  • n
slide-30
SLIDE 30

HOW ARE THEY FEELING NOW? A FEW REFLECTIONS FROM PARTICIPANTS:

  • Mor
  • re energy f

for

  • r life: mor

: more fami mily time me a and help a arou

  • und the h

hou

  • use
  • Better b

blood

  • od pressure
  • Feeling and

nd l looking healthie ier

  • Old c

clothes fit and nd pe peopl ple no notice!

  • Developing healthi

hier r r relationshi hips with h food and g getting t to know their r body’s sign gnals

slide-31
SLIDE 31

LIMITATIONS

  • Ex

Excl clusion o

  • f

f th the 46 46-54 age age gr group

  • Participants w

were s self s selected (may b y be different t to

  • the rest of
  • f the pop
  • pulation w

with respe pect t ct to charact cteristics cs under study)

STRENGTHS

  • Ne

New w Zeal Zealan and s spec ecific

  • FPG

PG + + PPPG PPPG

slide-32
SLIDE 32

CONCLUSIONS

  • Socioeconomic, b

behavioral a and nd a ant nthropometric inf nfluences on n gluc ucose metabo bolis ism are bo both p plausibl ble and nd c compl plex (Litera rature re) (Knowler, W W., ., Barrett, E., ., Fowler, , S., ., Ham amman man, R R., ., Lachli lin, J J., ., Walker, E E., ., Nathan, D., ., 2002; ; Maruth thur et a al., ., 2013; 13; Katula la et al., ., 2013; Allende-Vi Vigo, 2 , 2011; B Bergman, , 2012; ; Gillet ett et et al., 20 2012 12; Mout utzouri, , Tsimihod

  • dimos
  • s,

, Ri Rizos, & , & Elisaf, 2 201 011; Yates es, , Davies, & , & Khunt nti, , 2009 2009; Ratner er & & Sathasivam, , 201 011)

  • Som
  • me common

n associations were m mirrored (increa easing emo g emotional al eat eating an g and increa easing g BM BMI, increas asing b body f fat at an and plas asma a gl glucose e concen entration, BM BMI an and SES)

  • Others w

weren’ n’t (pl plasma gluc ucose a and nd ethnicity, BM BMI an and plas asma gl a glucose) e)

  • LED

D suc uccessful m method f for weight loss in n a mul ulticultural Auc uckland po popul pulation (weight lo loss m maintenance through li lifestyle i is the next step)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

THANK YOU SUPER SUPERVISORS AND THE PREVIEW TEAM

  • Prof. Sally D Poppitt

Dr Anne-Thea McGill

slide-34
SLIDE 34

REFERENCES

References Alle llende-Vigo, M.

  • M. Z.

. (20 2011). D Diabetes m mellitus pre

  • revention. America

can J Journal of Thera rapeutics cs, , Berg rgman, M. (

  • M. (20

2012). T Tre reatments o

  • f prediabetes. Louva

vain M Medical, 13 131(3) 3), 1 , 104-113. 3. Coppell, K. J . J., Ma ., Mann, J. . I., W I., Williams, , S. M., J . M., Jo, , E., D ., Dru rury, P

  • P. L., Mi

. L., Miller, J

  • J. C

. C., ., & Parn rnell, , W. . R. . (2013). P Prevalence of di diagn gnosed a d and d undi diagn gnosed di d diabetes a and d prediabetes in n new zealan and: Fi Findings fr from th the 2008/09 a adult n t nutr triti tion s

  • survey. The Ne

e New Zeal alan and Medica cal J Journal, 126 , 126(1370) 70), 2 , 23-42. 2. Gillett, M., M., Royle, P P., ., Sn Snai aith, A , A., S ., Sco cotland, G G., ., Poobal balan, A A., ., Im Imamura, M., . M., . . . . . Waugh, N

  • N. (

. (20 2012). . No Non-pharmacological interventions to

  • reduce t

the r risk sk of

  • f d

diabetes s in p people wi with i impaired glucose se r regulation: A A sy syst stematic r review and econ

  • nomic evaluation. Health T

th Techn hnology Asse sessm sment, 1 16(33) 33), 1 1-235. 35. Ka Katu tula, J J. . A., ., Vitoli lins ns, M.

  • M. Z., Mo

., Morg rgan, T

  • T. M.,

. M., Law awlor, M. S

  • M. S., B

., Blackwell, C C. . S., ., Is Isom, S S. . P., . ., . . . . . Goff Jr., D ., D. . C. . (20 2013). T . The h healthy l livi ving p partners rships t to pre revent d diabetes s study: 2 : 2-ye year

  • utcome

mes of a a randomi mized c cont ntrolle lled t

  • trial. Ameri

rican J Journ rnal of Pre reventive Me Medicine, 44 44(4 4 Suppl ppl 4) 4), S S32 324-332. 332.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

REFERENCES

Knowle ler, W W., B ., Barrett, E E., F ., Fowler, S S., ., Hamma mman, R , R., ., Lachli lin, J., W ., Walker, E E., N ., Nathan, D , D.,. .,. (2 (2002). Reduction in the i incidence o

  • f type 2

2 diab abetes w with l lifestyle le i intervention o

  • r metaf

afor

  • rmin. New E

Englan land J Journal l

  • f Medicine, 3

346(6), 393 393-403. La Larsen, T T. . M., ., Dalskov

  • v, S., v

., van Baak, M , M., ., Jebb bb, S S., ., Kaf afat atos

  • s, A

, A., ., P Pfeiffer, A A., ., . . . . . . Ast strup, A , A. (2 . (2010). ). T The d diet,

  • be

besity a and g genes ( (diog

  • genes) die

ietary s study in in eig ight european an countries – a com

  • mprehensive d

design for

  • r l

lon

  • ng-term i
  • intervention. Obesity R

Reviews, 1 11(1), 76 76-91. d doi:10.1111/j.1467- 789X.2009.00603.x Li Lindst strom, J J., ., Lo Louheranta, A A., ., Manneli lin, M , M., ., Rastas, M M., ., Salm lminen, V V., ., Eriksson, J , J., ., Tuom

  • mile

lehto, J J.,. .,. (2 (2003). ). T The finni nnish diab abetes p prevention

  • n study: Lifestyle

le i intervention a and 3 3-year ar result lts o

  • n diet a

and physical a al activity. . Diabetes Care, 2 , 26(12), 3 3230-3236. Maruthur, N N. . M., M ., Ma, Y , Y., ., Delah lahan anty, L.

  • L. M., N

., Nelson, J J. . A., ., Aroda, V V., ., White, N N. . H., . ., . . . . . Clark, J , J. . M. . (2 (2013). Early ly r respon

  • nse t

to preventive s strat ategies i in the d diabe abetes p prevention

  • n p
  • program. Journal o

al of G General al Internal al M Medicine, , 1 , 1-8. . Ministry o

  • f Health,.

h,. ( (2013). ). Mor Mortality a and d demographic d data 2 2010 .Min Ministry of

  • f Healt

alth

slide-36
SLIDE 36

REFERENCES

Mout utzouri, E , E., ., Tsim imih ihodimos, V V., ., Ri Rizos, E., & ., & Elisa saf, M

  • M. (2011).

1). Prediabet etes es: To treat o

  • r

no not t to t treat? Eur urope pean J Jour urnal of Pharmacology, 672(1-3), 9 , 9-19 19. Ratner, R. . E., ., & Sat athasivam am, A A. . (2011). Treatment recomm

  • mmendations f

for

  • r prediabetes.

Medical Cl Clini nics of North America, 9 95(2), (2), 385 385-395 395. Yates, T., D ., Davies, M , M., ., & Khunt nti, K. . (2009). P . Preventing typ ype 2 diabetes: C Can we ma make the e evidence w wor

  • rk? Postgraduate M

Medical l Journal, l, 8 85(100 007), 7), 4 475-480 480.

slide-37
SLIDE 37