Social Control & Justice: Crimmigration in the Age of Fear - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

social control justice
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Social Control & Justice: Crimmigration in the Age of Fear - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Crimmigration Control Conference Social Control & Justice: Crimmigration in the Age of Fear University of Coimbra Prof. Juliet P . Stumpf Lewis & Clark Law School * * Psychological jurisprudence research indicates that o People are


slide-1
SLIDE 1
  • Prof. Juliet P

. Stumpf Lewis & Clark Law School

Crimmigration Control Conference Social Control & Justice: Crimmigration in the Age of Fear

University of Coimbra

slide-2
SLIDE 2

*

*Psychological jurisprudence research indicates that—

  • People are more likely to support and comply with laws they

perceive as legitimate…and vice versa

*Perceptions of legitimacy are tied to:

  • Substantive norms
  • Procedural jurisprudence

Sources: Tom Tyler, “Why People Obey the Law” and related research

slide-3
SLIDE 3

*

The intersection of immigration and criminal law

Crimmigration Law has Two Profiles:

*Expansion of crime-based deportation:

* Criminal grounds for deportation proliferate * Relief mostly abolished * Result: increase deportations of LPRs

*Criminalize regulation of migration

* Illegal entry and illegal re-entry * From civil immigration system to criminal justice system * Diminish procedural protections in criminal justice system

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Crimmigration Law

*Crimmigration enforcement increases: *Mass prosecution & deportation –

* Postville, Iowa * Operation Streamline * Obama’s 497K deportees

*Crimmigration enforcement strategies expand *Immigration agents stop and search, arrest and

detain

*Detect arrested noncitizens in criminal

databases: Secure Communities

*Detention without bail or criminal charge *Plea agreements that waive immigration rights

slide-5
SLIDE 5

*

Crimmigration law as

*Substantive justice:

tensions between norms

*Procedural justice:

  • Whether people perceive

authority as treating them fairly is generally more important than a favorable substantive outcome.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

*

1.Representativeness 2.Consistency 3.Impartiality 4.Accuracy 5.Correctability 6.Ethicality

slide-7
SLIDE 7

*

*Cherry-pick procedural

elements favorable to authority

*Avoid procedural protections of

formal institutional process

*Avoid formal systems of criminal and

immigration adjudication

slide-8
SLIDE 8

*

*Judicial responses:

  • Operation Streamline
  • Padilla v Kentucky

*Noncitizen responses: willingness to report

crimes and cooperate with investigations?

slide-9
SLIDE 9

*

slide-10
SLIDE 10

* *

*Identify *Explore *Define *Quantify *Theorize

*Discover

*Analyze *Critique

*Report