SLO Assessment: Training the Trainers Marcy Alancraig Learning - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

slo assessment training the trainers
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

SLO Assessment: Training the Trainers Marcy Alancraig Learning - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SLO Assessment: Training the Trainers Marcy Alancraig Learning Outcomes Assessment Coordinator Cabrillo College Writing SLOs SLOs: The Big Picture Requires HIGHER LEVEL thinking skills Synthesizes many discreet skills Requires


slide-1
SLIDE 1

SLO Assessment: Training the Trainers

Marcy Alancraig Learning Outcomes Assessment Coordinator Cabrillo College

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Writing SLOs

slide-3
SLIDE 3

SLOs: The Big Picture

  • Requires HIGHER LEVEL thinking skills
  • Synthesizes many discreet skills
  • Requires students to APPLY what they’ve

learned

  • Results in a product
  • Product must be evaluated or assessed by

faculty

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Objective: Nuts and Bolts

  • Describes small, discreet skills
  • Requires basic thinking skills
  • Do not necessarily result in a product
slide-5
SLIDE 5

A comparison: English 1A

Objectives:

  • Develop a main

idea

  • Maintain a clear

command of tone

  • Show control of

standard English grammar SLO

  • Write essays,

including research- based writing, demonstrating academic rhetorical strategies and documentation.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Cabrillo Advice: Less is More!

  • Restrict SLOs to the most major skills,

knowledge or attitudes

  • Try for no more than 3-4 at the very most!

Two is better!

  • Remember that each SLO must be

assessed!

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Activity: Revise Course SLO

Are there any you can

  • Simply?
  • Combine?
  • Edit?
slide-8
SLIDE 8

SLO Assessment Methods

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Key Decisions

  • How much time do you want to spend?
  • Will the assessment be something extra

you require of students beyond class work?

  • Will the assessment be something extra

you expect of faculty?

  • Who will analyze the results?
  • How will you close the feedback loop?
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Reminder:

  • Use the KISS method
  • Keep it simple, sweetheart!
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Course-Embedded Assessment: Expanded Grading

  • Assesses artifacts produced in class –

papers, projects, portfolios, presentations

  • Uses rubrics or other explicitly stated

criteria to assess

  • Results analyzed and presented to decision

makers, resulting in decisions to improve student learning and teaching

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Primary Trait Analysis

  • Looks at one major assignment
  • Instructor constructs Primary Trait Scale

that scores each part of assignment

  • Results of each section calculated and

analyzed by faculty member

  • Presented to department with suggestions

for how to improve teaching and learning

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Cabrillo KISS Variation

  • Instructor chooses assignment, writes rubric and

grades assignment

  • Instructor analyzes results, looking for student

issues and needs – no numbers

  • Presents to department – no numbers
  • Department discusses results overall and makes

plans to improve

  • Discussion recorded on form that becomes part of

Departmental Review

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Side Benefits of Cabrillo Variation

  • No worries about academic freedom
  • No worries about evaluation
  • Departmental meeting becomes about

teaching - assignment, rubric and results presented

  • Some improvement of weak faculty (maybe)
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Other variations

  • Can have common departmental or section

assignment

  • Can use common departmental or section

rubric or PTA scale

  • Can have your researcher analyze grading

results, but still have to get him/her the info

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Portfolio Assessment

  • Students assemble collection of work
  • Faculty develop rubric to score it
  • Faculty are “normed”
  • Faculty score together outside of class
  • Requires extra time for norming and

scoring

  • Can be fun!
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Pre and Post Testing

  • Faculty design test that addresses course

SLOs

  • Same test given to students at the

beginning and end of course

  • Faculty or researcher scores results and

compares them, analyzing to see how well students have achieved outcomes

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Testing

  • Standardized tests
  • Analyzing questions on objective tests
  • Common paper or final
  • A caution: be careful of matriculation

issues

slide-19
SLIDE 19

More Key Decisions

  • Do you want different methods for each

course?

  • Would you prefer one method used by all

faculty in the department or across the entire college?

  • What makes sense for your college culture?
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Activity

  • Divide into groups by divisions.
  • Discuss assessment methods and choose
  • ne that will work for you
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Rubric Writing

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Closing the Loop

  • What activity will you use to present

assessment results?

  • How will this activity result in improving

teaching and learning?

  • How will you record the

results?

  • How will you implement them?
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Enhance teaching/ learning; inform institutional decision- making, planning, budgeting How well do we achieve our educational

  • bjectives?

Gather Evidence Interpret Evidence

Mission/Purposes Educational Objectives

– Peggy Maki, AAHE

The Assessment Loop

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Activity

  • Fill out Assessment Plan form to chart how

you will close the loop!