slide 1
play

Slide 1 ___________________________________ 8.1 Re sponsibility Ac - PDF document

Slide 1 ___________________________________ 8.1 Re sponsibility Ac c ounting o De c e ntr a lization within or g anizations ___________________________________ o Adva ntag e s o T op mana g e me nt re lie ve d of da y-to da y ac tivitie s


  1. Slide 1 ___________________________________ 8.1 Re sponsibility Ac c ounting o De c e ntr a lization within or g anizations ___________________________________ o Adva ntag e s o T op mana g e me nt re lie ve d of da y-to da y ac tivitie s ___________________________________ o L owe r- le ve l mana ge rs ofte n ha ve be tte r knowle dg e of the de tails o L owe r- le ve l mana ge rs a re quic ke r to re spond to c ustome r ne e ds ___________________________________ o Provide s lowe r- le ve l ma nag e rs e xpe rie nc e in de c ision making proc e ss o L owe r le ve l mana ge rs ofte n more motiva te d, ___________________________________ ta lk about inc re a se d job sa tisfa c tion whic h improve s re te ntion ___________________________________ 2005 K D Ha the wa y-Dia l ___________________________________ Slide 2 ___________________________________ Re sponsibility Ac c ounting o De c e ntra liza tion within ___________________________________ org a niza tions o Disadvantage s ___________________________________ o L owe r-le ve l mana ge rs ma y not grasp the “big pic ture ” o L a c k of c oordination among st ___________________________________ ma nag e rs – too ma ny c owboys o L owe r-le ve l mana ge rs ma y have diffe ring obje c tive s from the c ompany ___________________________________ o May be diffic ult to spr e ad innova tion ___________________________________ 2005 K D Ha the wa y-Dia l ___________________________________ Slide 3 ___________________________________ Cost, Pr ofit & Inve stme nt Ce nte r s o Cost Ce nte r s ___________________________________ o Mana ge r s ha ve c ontr ol ove r c osts o Mana ge r s do not have c ontr ol ove r : ___________________________________ o Re ve nue , or o Inve stme nt funds ___________________________________ o Mana ge rs e xpec te d to minimize c osts o Standar d c osts a nd flexible budg et ___________________________________ var ianc e s use d to e valuate c ost c e nte r pe rfor ma nc e ___________________________________ 2005 K D Ha the wa y-Dia l ___________________________________

  2. Slide 4 ___________________________________ Cost, Pr ofit & Inve stme nt Ce nte r s o Profit Ce nte rs ___________________________________ o Manag e r s ha ve c ontr ol ove r both: o Costs and ___________________________________ o Re ve nue o Manag e r s do not have c ontr ol ove r inve stme nt funds ___________________________________ o Pe rfor ma nc e me asure me nt is a c tual profit to proje c te d or ___________________________________ budge te d pr ofit ___________________________________ 2005 K D Ha the wa y-Dia l ___________________________________ Slide 5 ___________________________________ Cost, Pr ofit & Inve stme nt Ce nte r s o Inve stme nt Ce nte r s ___________________________________ o Mana ge r s ha ve c ontr ol ove r : o Costs, ___________________________________ o Re ve nue , a nd o Inve stme nts in ope rating a sse ts o Pe rfor ma nc e me asure me nt is the ___________________________________ r e tur n on inve stme nt ___________________________________ ___________________________________ 2005 K D Ha the wa y-Dia l ___________________________________ Slide 6 ___________________________________ Org aniza tiona l Vie w o Administr ative de pa r tme nts suc h as ___________________________________ fina nc e , HR, pa yroll a nd le g a l a re c la ssifie d a s c ost c e nte rs ___________________________________ o Wa re house s, ma nufa c turing pla nts, a nd distribution c e nte rs a re c la ssifie d a s profit c e nte rs ___________________________________ o Corpora te he a dqua rte rs would be c la ssifie d a s the inve stme nt c e nte r ___________________________________ ___________________________________ 2005 K D Ha the wa y-Dia l ___________________________________

  3. Slide 7 ___________________________________ Se g me nte d Sta te me nts o Ca n be pre pa r e d for ma ny ___________________________________ le ve ls o Commonly use a c ontribution ___________________________________ ma rg in forma t o F ixe d c osts a re broke n furthe r ___________________________________ into: o T r ac e a ble o c ommon ___________________________________ ___________________________________ 2005 K D Ha the wa y-Dia l ___________________________________ Slide 8 ___________________________________ Se g me nte d Sta te me nt T RAC EABL E FIXED C OST S ___________________________________ T o tal Co mpany Divisio n 1 Divisio n 2 Sale s $125,000 75,000 50,000 Variable Expe nse 60,000 42,000 18,000 Contribution Margin 65,000 33,000 32,000 ___________________________________ T ra c e a ble F ixe d Costs 31,000 13,000 18,000 Se gme nt Margin 34,000 20,000 14,000 Common F ixe d Costs ___________________________________ 22,000 Ne t o pe ra ting inc ome 12,000 SEGMENT E D MARG IN ___________________________________ COMMON FIXED COST S ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 9 ___________________________________ T r ac e able & Common F ixe d Costs o T r a c e able fixe d c ost ___________________________________ o Inc ur re d c ost be c a use of the se g me nt o If the se g me nt wa s e limina te d the fixe d c ost would be e liminate d also o Some e xample s: ___________________________________ o F ac tory mana ge r of a ma nufa c turing pla nt o Insura nc e on the ma nufa c turing pla nt o Ma inte na nc e on the ma nufa c turing pla nt ___________________________________ o Charg e d to the se g me nts ___________________________________ ___________________________________ 2005 K D Ha the wa y-Dia l ___________________________________

  4. Slide 10 ___________________________________ T r ac e able & Common F ixe d Costs o Common fixe d c ost ___________________________________ o Costs tha t suppor t the ope r ation of mor e than one se gme nt o If a se gme nt was e liminate d the ___________________________________ fixe d c ost would NOT be e liminate d o Some e xa mple s: ___________________________________ o CE O’s salary o Cost of he ating a n e ntir e fac ility tha t house s se ve ra l se g me nts ___________________________________ o T he c ost of motor pool for the c ompany o Cha r ge d to entity as a whole a nd not to individual se gme nts ___________________________________ 2005 K D Ha the wa y-Dia l ___________________________________ Slide 11 ___________________________________ Se g me nt Ma rg in o Ca lc ula te d by subtra c ting “tra c e a ble ” ___________________________________ fixe d c osts from the se g me nts c ontribution ma rg in ___________________________________ o Inc lude s only those c osts c a use d by the se g me nt ___________________________________ o He lps a sse ss future profita bility of the se g me nt ___________________________________ ___________________________________ 2005 K D Ha the wa y-Dia l ___________________________________ Slide 12 ___________________________________ Assig ning T ra c e a ble Costs o Ina ppropria te ly a ssig ne d tra c e d ___________________________________ c osts o inc or r e c tly tr ac ing c osts ___________________________________ o Costs that c an be dire c tly trac e d to one se gme nt should not be alloc a te d to a nothe r ___________________________________ o F or e xa mple : Assigning ha za r dous waste c osts to all de par tme nts inste ad of the one tha t c re ate s the ___________________________________ waste ___________________________________ 2005 K D Ha the wa y-Dia l ___________________________________

  5. Slide 13 ___________________________________ Assig ning T ra c e a ble Costs o Ina ppropria te Alloc a tion Ba se ___________________________________ o Using arbitrary base s o Costs should only be alloc ate d whe n the base drive s the c ost proportionally ___________________________________ o A base should only be use d whe n a 10% inc re a se shows a 10% inc re a se in the c ost ___________________________________ o F or e xa mple : mac hine hours should only be use d as a base whe n a c ausa l re la tionship be twe e n it a nd the trac e a ble ___________________________________ fixe d c osts suc h a s ma inte nanc e a nd lubric ant c a n be shown ___________________________________ 2005 K D Ha the wa y-Dia l ___________________________________ Slide 14 ___________________________________ Dividing Common Costs o Assig ning c ommon c osts ___________________________________ ra ndomly will distort se g me nt pe rforma nc e ___________________________________ o Common c osts not ma na g e a ble by se g me nts ma na g e r ___________________________________ o F or e xa mple a ssig ning the c ost of the CE O ’s c or pora te ___________________________________ je t to se g me nts ___________________________________ 2005 K D Ha the wa y-Dia l ___________________________________

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend