Six Middle Rio Grande Pueblo Prior and Paramount Water Accounting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

six middle rio grande pueblo prior and paramount water
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Six Middle Rio Grande Pueblo Prior and Paramount Water Accounting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Six Middle Rio Grande Pueblo Prior and Paramount Water Accounting Brian Westfall Keller-Bliesner Engineering History Prior to creation of MRGCD in 1923 there were about 70 direct diversions from the Rio Grande within the Middle Rio


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Six Middle Rio Grande Pueblo Prior and Paramount Water Accounting

Brian Westfall Keller-Bliesner Engineering

slide-2
SLIDE 2

History

  • Prior to creation of MRGCD in 1923 there were

about 70 direct diversions from the Rio Grande within the Middle Rio Grande Valley

  • MRGCD combined the separate systems from Cochiti

Pueblo to Bosque del Apache National Wildlife Refuge so only four diversion dams were required to divert water to MRGCD lands.

  • To combine systems MRGCD had to incorporate the

systems of the Six Middle Rio Grande Pueblos into MRGCD

slide-3
SLIDE 3

History

  • This required Congressional Approval
  • In 1928 the Secretary of Interior executed an

agreement with MRGCD providing for Conservation, Irrigation, Drainage and Flood Control for the Pueblo Indian Lands in the Rio Grande Valley

  • The 1928 act provided that water rights on 8,346

acres Pueblo lands “shall be prior and paramount to any rights of the district or of any property holder therein”

slide-4
SLIDE 4

History

  • The total P&P lands acreage was later updated to the

current 8,847 acres

  • There has not been much controversy since that time

regarding the Pueblos taking natural flow

  • There has been controversy on applying the Rio

Grande Compact to P&P reservoir storage and release in post-Compact reservoirs (El Vado).

slide-5
SLIDE 5

1981 El Vado Storage Agreement

  • Laid out general procedures for storage and release
  • f P&P water
  • Signatories to this agreement were:
  • Six Middle Rio Grande Pueblos Irrigation

Committee

  • Bureau of Reclamation
  • Secretary of Interior Designated Engineer
  • Bureau of Indian Affairs
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Current Procedures

  • Designated Engineer (DE), Coalition and Bureau of

Reclamation meet three times a year in the spring to calculate P&P water to store in El Vado

  • Storage requirement is based on estimated P&P

lands crop water requirements accounting for irrigation and conveyance efficiencies

  • When P&P demands at Otowi can not be met

through natural flow P&P stored water is released from El Vado

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Current Procedures

  • The role of the DE is to determine if a P&P release

requested by one of the Pueblos is justified

  • Unused Indian Storage Account water is typically

transferred during the month of November (MRGCD

  • r Elephant Butte)
slide-8
SLIDE 8

DE’s Computation Tools

  • Excel spreadsheets are used in both the

storage and release calculations

slide-9
SLIDE 9

DE vs. URGWOM

  • BIA requested that Keller-Bliesner Engineering

compare the methods used by the DE to URGWOM methods

  • Report those differences to BIA and the URGWOM

technical committee

  • Attempt to resolve the differences
slide-10
SLIDE 10

What were the Differences?

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Storage Calculation

  • El Vado P&P storage is calculated monthly as

follows: (somewhat simplified)

– Forecast available “natural flow” at Otowi using procedures in 1981 agreement – Compare the P&P demand to the forecasted flow – if P&P Demand > Available “natural flow” then difference plus the El Vado to Otowi losses is the storage requirement

  • Difference in P&P Demand
slide-12
SLIDE 12

P&P Demand Differences

  • Pueblo demand at Otowi used in El Vado

Storage calculation

– URGWOM uses 63,383 ac-ft – BIA uses 83,736 ac-ft This difference has not been resolved

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Forecast Flow Factors

  • 1981 Agreement specified factors to estimate

water supply at Otowi from forecasted Flow

– March 1 forecast (March to July) multiplied by 0.6 – April 1 forecast (April to July) multiplied by 0.7 – May 1 forecast (May to July) multiplied by 0.8 – URGWOM had used 0.7, 0.8, 0.9 and factors were changed to reflect the DE’s values

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Storage Requirement Rule Change

  • Change made to function:

ComputeSupplyAtOtowi Low Record Late Summer Flows + Forecasted RO Volume Remaining * Monthly Spring RO Percentage – Anticipated El Vado Storage

slide-15
SLIDE 15

P&P Releases

  • Determine the P&P demand at Otowi

If

usable “natural flow” at Otowi < P&P demand

then

release water from El Vado Indian storage account

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Release Rule Changes

  • URGWOM method relies only on flow at

Embudo – any natural flow arriving at Otowi from La Puente would not be seen

  • DE methods accounts for the La Puente flow
  • URGWOM method is a simplification that has

been discussed and approved by the DE

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Other Release Rule Corrections

slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19

P&P Demand below Otowi (79,188 vs. 85,534)

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov Spreadsheet URGWOM

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Questions