site design appeals to diversifying markets
play

Site design appeals to diversifying markets increases lead capture - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Site design appeals to diversifying markets increases lead capture 89% Jacob Baldwin Search Engine Marketing Manager One Call Now Session Speaker Jacob Baldwin Search Engine Marketing Manager One Call Now Black & White Headshot


  1. Site design appeals to diversifying markets …increases lead capture 89% Jacob Baldwin Search Engine Marketing Manager One Call Now

  2. Session Speaker Jacob Baldwin Search Engine Marketing Manager One Call Now Black & White Headshot Jacob Baldwin is the Search Engine Marketing Manager for America’s largest and fastest growing voice, text and email notification company, One Call Now. During his time there, Baldwin has spearheaded major projects such as the radical redesign of its marketing site, the construction and application of the digital @Jacobaldwin marketing testing and strategy programs and the implementation of its persona-based content marketing program. He has been quoted in numerous business publications including Website Magazine, Inc. Online, Businessbolts.com, and The Network Journal. 2

  3. The Company • 10 years old • B2B and B2C SaaS provider of automated notification solutions • We facilitate one-to-many communication for Businesses, schools, various other not-for- profit groups

  4. Gotta start somewhere • In the beginning, I knew nothing about digital marketing, web design, lead capture, conversion actions, SEO, information architecture, personas - nothing. • We didn’t have any sophisticated testing software. • All of the tests we did were sequential, not A/B. • The new site we created was a great improvement, but it’s not by any means perfect.

  5. Improving Lead Gen More and more marketers are optimizing online activity to improve their lead generation efforts.

  6. Why Optimize? Lead Gen. Cheetahlearning.com

  7. The Challenge • Thought sequence • Page layout • Imagery • SEO • Segmentation model • Messaging/Value Prop

  8. Back to the drawing board: Segmentation modeling • Religious Organizations Original • Small Churches • Medium Churches • Religious Organizations • Large Churches • Mega & Corporate • Synagogues Churches • Religious Organizations • Into Congregational • Other Churches • Business • • Synagogues & Chabads Consumer Services • • Healthcare Business • • Property Management Customer Notification • Manufacturing • Business Continuity • Utilities Providers • Staffing Calls • Other

  9. Back to the drawing board: Persona Characteristics Humanistic Methodical Competitive Spontaneous Characteristics Characteristics Characteristics Characteristics • • • • Touchy-feely Very logical Wants to be the best, Doesn’t want or need • • Enjoys reading about Will likely consume wants to use the best to talk to sales person • people & special every piece of related products Ready to purchase at • interest stories content before making Very results-oriented, any moment • • Philanthropic decision needs to prove success Knows what they want

  10. Back to the drawing board: Persona-specific content Humanistic Methodical Competitive Spontaneous Appealing content Appealing content Appealing content Appealing content • • • • Testimonials Case studies Testimonials 800 Number • • • • Videos Product/tech spec Value proposition Option to “Buy Now” • • • Social responsibility sheets Feature sets Pricing info • • (marketing with a Long copy Side-by-side purpose) comparisons

  11. VERY Long Story Short… • New segmentation model drove basic navigation structure and information architecture • Identification of persona characteristics informed content production and on-page content offerings and CTA’s. 12

  12. VERY Long Story Short… • New segmentation model drove basic navigation structure and information architecture • Identification of persona characteristics informed content production and on-page content offerings and CTA’s. 13

  13. Experiment 1: Background Experiment ID: One Call Now Multivariate Lead Capture Test Location: Homepage Test Protocol: TP0001 Research Notes: Background: Radical redesign of website. Objective: Increase conversion rate, increase traffic, reduce bounce rate, provide niched messaging via enhanced segmentation. Primary Research Question: Which version of our homepage will produce a higher lead capture rate? Test Design: Before-and-after optimization test to assess whether or not radical redesign will increase lead capture. 14

  14. Experiment 1: Original Homepage Note: • Navigation placement • CTA Placement • Color Palette • Imagery • Multiple value propositions • General layout of homepage 15

  15. Experiment 1: Treatment Note: • Restructured nav • Consolidated CTA’s • Single value proposition • Trust indicators • Color palette • New content 16

  16. Experiment 1: Side-by-side Control Treatment 17

  17. Experiment 1: Results 19% increase in lead capture Creating a more “professional - looking” website and clearly labeling CTA’s worked to clarify what action we wanted people to take. Experiment 1 Original Treatment %∆ Homepage layout modification 2.40% 2.85% +18.75% Never stop improving : Website improvements are incremental and should ! be treated as such. Complacency is CRO’s worst enemy. Test, tune, repeat. 18

  18. Experiment 2: One Call Now CRO Test Experiment ID: One Call Now Conversion Panel Test 1 Location: Homepage Test Protocol: TP0002 Research Notes: Background: Consolidated CTA’s into single area. Test optimal number and mix of CTA’s displayed. Objective: Increase lead capture rate. Primary Research Question: Which version of our CTA panel will produce a higher lead capture rate? Test Design: Before-and-after optimization test to assess whether or not reducing the number of CTA’s will increase lead capture. 19

  19. Experiment 2: CRO Test Original: • 11 Conversion actions in this 3”x3” space • Hypertext links on top of textured gradient background • Equal CTA weighting

  20. Experiment 2: CRO Test Treatment: • Reduced the number of CTA’s • Used actual buttons instead of hypertext links • “Free Trial” carries heavier weight • Put additional conversion actions such as “Request a Quote” in the Learn More pop up.

  21. Experiment 2: CRO Test Original Treatment

  22. Experiment 2: Results 9.47% decrease in Lead Capture Beware of blindly following “best practices”! Experiment 2 Original Treatment %∆ CTA Panel Modification 2.85% 2.58% -9.47% Beware myopic logic: Just because it makes sense to you doesn’t mean it ! makes sense to your audiences. 23

  23. But Wait…

  24. Where did “Request A Quote” go? • Capturing sample calls and free trial signups from front page. • Moved RFQ inside popup dialog when you click “Learn More” • What was the result? 25

  25. What can we learn? ?! Hint: Experiment 3 26

  26. What can we learn? ?! Hint: Experiment 3 27

  27. Experiment 3: Background Experiment ID: One Call Now Conversion Panel Test 3 Location: Homepage Test Protocol: TP0003 Research Notes: Background: Modified number of CTA’s and layout of presentation. Looking for optimal performance. Objective: Increase lead capture rate. Primary Research Question: Which version of our CTA display will generate a higher lead capture rate? Test Design: Before-and-after optimization test to assess if changing the number and layout of CTA’s will increase lead capture. 28

  28. Experiment 3: CRO Test Original: • Three main conversion buttons • “Free Trial” carries heavier weight • Put additional conversion actions such as “Request a Quote” in the Learn More pop up.

  29. Experiment 3: CRO Test Treatment: • Added Request a Quote back into the mix • New button layout – “quadrant - style” • Equal weighting for all four CTA’s

  30. Experiment 3: CRO Test Original Treatment

  31. Experiment 3: Results 76.34% increase in lead capture Quad-style CTA layout promotes higher engagement and drives lead capture rate. Experiment 3 Original Treatment %∆ CTA Panel Modification 2.58% 4.55% +76.36% Proximity Matters : The closer your conversion actions are to your front ! door, the more likely they’ll get found and clicked. 32

  32. Experiment 4: Background Experiment ID: One Call Now Free Trial Signup Process Test Location: Homepage Test Protocol: TP0004 Research Notes: Background: I think the pagination of Free Trial signup process creates too much friction. Objective: Increase Free Trial lead capture rate. Primary Research Question: Which version of our Free Trial signup process will produce higher lead capture rates? Test Design: Before-and-after optimization test to assess whether or not a two-step signup process creates less friction/anxiety as the 4-step signup process. 33

  33. Experiment 4: Free Trial Signups Original: • Four-step signup process • Word “checkout” to proceed with free trial? • If we’re not asking for any CC info, why are there dollar signs ($) on this page?

  34. Experiment 4: Free Trial Signups Treatment: • Four-step signup process shortened to a single page • “Checkout” language changed to “Start Free Trial” • Removed $ signs

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend