Single Entry Point Financial Compliance Reviews Fall 2016 Training - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

single entry point financial compliance reviews
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Single Entry Point Financial Compliance Reviews Fall 2016 Training - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Single Entry Point Financial Compliance Reviews Fall 2016 Training Presentation Presented by John F. Olenberger, CPA Colorado Independent Consultants Network, LLC 1 Discussion Topics 1. Financial Compliance Review (FRC) Process 2. Prevalent


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Single Entry Point Financial Compliance Reviews

Fall 2016 Training Presentation Presented by John F. Olenberger, CPA

Colorado Independent Consultants Network, LLC

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Discussion Topics

  • 1. Financial Compliance Review (FRC)

Process

  • 2. Prevalent issues
  • 3. Tips for a smooth FCR process

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Financial Compliance Review (FRC) Process

  • 1. Oversight requirement
  • 2. Desk Reviews
  • 3. Risk Assessment
  • 4. On-Site Reviews

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Prevalent issues (≥5)

  • 1. Incorrectly reported SEFA (12)
  • 2. Payroll costs were not based on actual time

worked (6)

  • 3. Unsupported allocation methodology (6)
  • 4. HCA split out (6)
  • 5. Inappropriate expenditures/program
  • vercharged (5)

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • 1. Incorrectly reported SEFA
  • #1 most common issue
  • Half of sites, including desk reviews
  • Many are repeat issues
  • No root cause on half of issues- unable

to support figure reported

  • Other sources of problem

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • 1. Incorrectly reported SEFA

(con’t)

  • CDHCPF award letter language adjusted for SFY

2013; some external auditors may be focusing

  • n figures, rather than language
  • Should report lesser of amount rec’d or amount

expended (Federal funds portion)

  • Root cause is usually external auditor preparing

SEFA without input from SEP Agency

  • 5 noted to date in FY ‘16- Getting better

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • 1. Incorrectly reported SEFA

Examples of proper reporting

Funding Expenditures Report on SEFA (1/2 of expenditures, up to Fed award) 1,000,000 1,200,000 500,000 1,000,000 900,000 450,000

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • 2. Payroll costs were not based
  • n actual time worked
  • Present in 29% of site visits (up from

13% in FY ’14

  • Hard-coding of allocation % in payroll

system; time sheets disregarded

  • Charges based on budgetary estimates,

not trued up

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • 3. Unsupported allocation

methodology

  • 29% of sites (down from 38% last year)
  • Vast majority could not provide support for

how a charge was derived

  • Unsupported internal service rates
  • Expenses “pushed” by another department

are still SEP expenses

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • 4. HCA split out
  • 29% of sites (same as last year)
  • Relatively new issue (First brought up

during FY 2012 audits)

  • SEP= state & federally funded
  • HCA= state funded only
  • Cannot use federal funds for a non

federally funded program

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • 4. HCA split out (con’t)
  • Problems with precise time tracking
  • New guidance allows allocation by client

counts

  • All time incurred for initial assessments as

well as re-assessments can be charged to

  • HCBS. Ongoing HCA case management

must be charged to HCA.

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • 5. Inappropriate expenditures/

program overcharged

  • 24% of sites (down from 38% last year)
  • Erroneously coded to SEP
  • Monthly charges for IT equipment used by other

departments

  • Reimbursement of provider charges for client medical care
  • Unemployment benefits charged to SEP program for non-

SEP employee with similar name.

  • Personnel costs not based on actual time worked
  • Co-Mingling of HCA & HCBS expenditures
  • $140K in program overcharges identified, over half related

to co-mingling.

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Tips for a smooth FCR process

  • Detailed list of expenditures should tie to

totals per general ledger. If they do not, provide a reconciliation and explanation.

  • “Self audit”- For the selected transactions,

ensure the supporting documentation makes sense to you. If it doesn’t, determine if alternate documentation exists to support transaction.

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Tips for a smooth FCR process (cont.)

  • Obtain support for County allocations. If you are

allocated $100/month for IT costs, how does the County arrive at this number? Is it reasonable?

  • Support- We are looking for the minimum required to

support the transaction, allocation, and applicability to the program.

  • We do not need a copy of the check, as we obtained

this info from the detailed transaction listing.

  • Copies that are helpful to us: Receipt/invoice,

approval, allocation calculation

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Tips for a smooth FCR process (cont.)

  • Need support for basis of County
  • allocation. If the County is allocating a

$20K insurance bill, we will want to see the actual $20K bill to the County.

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Questions/Comments

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Contact Information

John F. Olenberger, CPA

Colorado Independent Consultants Network, LLC

(303) 333-8989 jolenberger@cicn.biz www.cicn.biz

17