simulation of movable translucent aerogel shutters
play

Simulation of movable translucent aerogel shutters Dr Ralph Evins, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Simulation of movable translucent aerogel shutters Dr Ralph Evins, Empa & ETH, Zrich Dr Mark Dowson, Buro Happold Ltd, London Moveable aerogel shutter Dowson, M., 2012. Novel retrofit technologies incorporating silica aerogel for lower


  1. Simulation of movable translucent aerogel shutters Dr Ralph Evins, Empa & ETH, Zürich Dr Mark Dowson, Buro Happold Ltd, London

  2. Moveable aerogel shutter Dowson, M., 2012. Novel retrofit technologies incorporating silica aerogel for lower energy buildings. Doctoral thesis, Brunel University.

  3. Combinations U-value G-value Daylight Cost Single glazing 5.7 0.85 75% - Old double glazing 2.8 0.77 68% - New double glazing 1.8 0.54 64% ££ New triple glazing New triple glazing 0.8 0.8 0.36 0.36 55% 55% £££ £££ Single glazing 1.17 0.51 51% £ + aerogel shutter Old double glazing 0.95 0.45 45% £ + aerogel shutter

  4. No shutter With shutter Simplified calculation approach 1. Run a dynamic thermal model for a whole year for each insulation level, manually or parametric model. 2. Sum the total energy use for each option at a specified frequency (hourly, daily, weekly). 3. Select the option giving the minimum energy use for each period.

  5. Results Annual load (kWh/m2/yr) 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0 5 27.3 40.2 7.2 5.7 Single glazing (SG) 12.0 27.2 9.1 6.1 Old double glazing (ODG) 21.3 47% 8.2 6.9 6.2 22% New double glazing 17.3 57% 3.7 6.9 6.7 36% Triple glazing 12.2 23.2 42% 4.0 7.0 SG + Aerogel 22.2 11.5 3.3 7.4 18% ODG + Aerogel 17.2 4.1 7.1 6.0 57% Hourly SG + Aerogel 19.9 4.4 9.2 6.2 50% Daily SG + Aerogel 20.4 4.5 9.6 6.3 49% Weekly SG + Aerogel 18.5 3.3 8.9 6.3 32% Hourly ODG + Aerogel 10.7 20.6 3.4 6.5 24% Daily ODG + Aerogel 11.0 21.0 23% 3.5 6.6 Weekly ODG + Aerogel 41% 10.7 23.8 7.2 5.9 Controlled SG + Aerogel 21.2 22% 5.9 9.0 6.3 Controlled ODG + Aerogel

  6. Model predictive control 25 2.7% 0.3% Each day: 19.99 19.53 19.47 20 d (kWh/m2/yr) 2* daily simulations 2% 0% 4.93 4.79 4.81 15 Open Closed 0.1% -1% Annual load Annual Select lowest energy 10 12.09 simulation 11.98 12.07 configuration 5 Use for next day 2.97 15% 7% 2.76 2.59 0 Simplified Re-evaluated MPC Different Simplified MPC Open 1 0 Closed

  7. Conclusions Good choice for single-glazed buildings Can outperform triple-glazing if controlled hourly Less effective on the south façade (cooling dominated) Fixed aerogel shutters are effective on north façades (heating dominated) Best possible combination: − triple-glazing south − hourly-controlled aerogel shutters on all other façades Simplified calculation approach performed well (within 3% when dynamic effects re-evaluated) Model-predictive control gave very similar results

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend