SI SI SIMPLIFYING DESIGN SIMPLIFYING DESIGN MPLIFYING DESIGN - - PDF document

▶
si si simplifying design simplifying design mplifying
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

SI SI SIMPLIFYING DESIGN SIMPLIFYING DESIGN MPLIFYING DESIGN - - PDF document

Jan 25, 2023 778 likes •990 views

University Park Pennsylvania Jason Jason McFad McFadden en Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management SI SI SIMPLIFYING DESIGN SIMPLIFYING DESIGN MPLIFYING DESIGN MPLIFYING DESIGN TO CONSTRUCTION TO CONSTRUCTION TO

slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

“ “SI SIMPLIFYING DESIGN MPLIFYING DESIGN SI SIMPLIFYING DESIGN MPLIFYING DESIGN TO CONSTRUCTION TO CONSTRUCTION TO CONSTRUCTION TO CONSTRUCTION” ”

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

Project Overview Project Overview Tech Technic nical Analyses l Analyses Steel Ta l Tape pered C d Colu lumn A Analysis is Streamlining Structural St Streamlining Structural Steel eel Design and Construction Design and Construction Electr ectrica ical D Distribut stribution Ana

  • n Analysis

is Summary and Concl Summary and Conclusions sions Acknowledgements knowledgements Clarif arificat ication ions & Question & Questions Presentation Outline Presentation Outline

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

“In The “In The Batter’s Box Batter’s Box”

Sports Facility Sports Facility

Penn State Baseball (Big Ten) State College Spikes (Minor League “A”)

Tra Traditiona itional Pro l Project De t Delivery w/ C livery w/ CM Agent Agent 35 Acre Open Field Site 35 Acre Open Field Site $25 $25.3M C .3M Construction Cost nstruction Cost June 2005 – June 2005 – May 2006 Co May 2006 Construction Schedul nstruction Schedule

Project Overview

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

Arc Architectural Accolade hitectural Accolades Pro Project Ove ect Overview ew

5,406 5,406 Fixe

Fixed Seat d Seating Capac ing Capacity ty

18 18 Luxury Suites

Luxury Suites Sch School

  • ol Of Journalism

Of Journalism Me Media Observation Area dia Observation Area 60’ 60’ Tall Tall Entrance Masonry Pylon Entrance Masonry Pylon 18.55’ 18.55’ RF Outfield Fence RF Outfield Fence San Sand Gri Grid Drai Drainag nage Sys System em

44’ 44’ Scoreboard He

  • reboard Height

ight

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

Project Overview Project Overview Tech Technic nical Analyses l Analyses Steel Ta l Tape pered C d Colu lumn A Analysis is Streamlining Structural St Streamlining Structural Steel eel Design and Construction Design and Construction Electr ectrica ical D Distribut stribution Ana

  • n Analysis

is Summary and Concl Summary and Conclusions sions Acknowledgements knowledgements Clarif arificat ication ions & Question & Questions Presentation Outline Presentation Outline

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

“Lead “Leading Of ng Off Firs f First” t” Structur ructural An al Anal alysis is

(1 (1) W ) W14X132 (2 (2) W ) W14X90

120’- ’-6” Above Fiel

Above Field Level d Level HSS Latera SS Lateral Cross-Bracing l Cross-Bracing Encase Encased with d with 1” Pl Plates

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

De Designed Column signed Column Minimal Structural Integrity

Very Labor Intensive with Wel Very Labor Intensive with Welding ing

Water Penetration

Ma Maintenance Concern intenance Concern

Ease of SJO Cable Installation

Architectur Architectural Tapered Plates Tapered Plates

Structur ructural An al Anal alysis is

15% of Stee

% of Steel Tonnage ( l Tonnage (86 Tons) Tons)

28 Days For Structure

SPLICE PL SPLICE PLATES ATES

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

Alternat ternative Structural ive Structural Member Member

Goal Goals

Ma Mainta intain Ae in Aesthe sthetic Smooth App tic Smooth Appeal al

Structur ructural An al Anal alysis is

Ea Easier Erection Method sier Erection Method

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

Alternative Design Alternative Design

Two Options Two Options Welding Bead Welding Bead Sp Splice Conne lice Connect ction ion

Structur ructural An al Anal alysis is

Tapered Steel Tapered Steel Tub Tube Constructed with 1” Constructed with 1” Plate Plate

80 Tons of Steel

Tons of Steel 1” 1” Steel P

Steel Plate Co ate Column lumn 5/1 5/16” Weld eld

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

Designed Col Designed Column vs. Pr mn vs. Propose

  • posed De

Designed Colum signed Column

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

$22 $223,3 3,300 Tota Total $98,600

Equipment

$65,200

Material

$59,500

Labor Total Description

Designed Co Designed Column C lumn Cost Summary st Summary

$22 $223,3 3,300 Tota Total $98,600

Equipment

$65,200

Material

$59,500

Labor Total Description

Designed Co Designed Column C lumn Cost Summary st Summary

Designed Col Designed Column vs. Pr mn vs. Propose

  • posed De

Designed Colum signed Column Cost Summary Cost Summary

$17 $178,1 ,100 00 Tota Total $71,700

Equipment

$60,100

Material

$46,300

Labor Total Description

Alt lter erna native C ve Colum lumn Cost Cost S Summa mmary ry

$17 $178,1 ,100 00 Tota Total $71,700

Equipment

$60,100

Material

$46,300

Labor Total Description

Alt lter erna native C ve Colum lumn Cost Cost S Summa mmary ry

($45,200) ($45,200)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

Designed Col Designed Column vs. Pr mn vs. Propose

  • posed De

Designed Colum signed Column Pr Project Impacts

  • ject Impacts

Overall cost savings of $45,200. Heavy equipment (crane) moved off- site quicker. Easier ability to run SJO cable to power light fixtures. Continuous weld on plates adds extra waterproofing of structural member. Possibly could limit the amount of steel fabricator’s bidding on project. Erection duration savings of 7 days. Disadvantages Advantages

Propo Proposed Al ed Alte ternative Col rnative Column Desig mn Design

Overall cost savings of $45,200. Heavy equipment (crane) moved off- site quicker. Easier ability to run SJO cable to power light fixtures. Continuous weld on plates adds extra waterproofing of structural member. Possibly could limit the amount of steel fabricator’s bidding on project. Erection duration savings of 7 days. Disadvantages Advantages

Propo Proposed Al ed Alte ternative Col rnative Column Desig mn Design Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

Designed Col Designed Column vs. Pr mn vs. Propose

  • posed De

Designed Colum signed Column Conclusion Conclusion

Dec Decrea ease sed S d Steel eel Tonnage Tonnage Same Same Ae Aesthetic sthetic Architectural App Architectural Appeal al Signif ifica icant La t Labo bor Savin Savings Easie Easier Erection Method Erection Method

Pr Propose

  • posed Colum

Column…

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

Project Overview Project Overview Tech Technic nical Analyses l Analyses Steel Ta l Tape pered C d Colu lumn A Analysis is Streamlining Structural St Streamlining Structural Steel eel Design and Construction Design and Construction Electr ectrica ical D Distribut stribution Ana

  • n Analysis

is Summary and Concl Summary and Conclusions sions Acknowledgements knowledgements Clarif arificat ication ions & Question & Questions Presentation Outline Presentation Outline

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

“Sliding Into “Sliding Into Second” Second”

Retail Retail Store & Ticket Building Store & Ticket Building Year Round U Year Round Use

2000 2000 S.F.

S.F.

Electrical Analysi Electrical Analysis

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

De Desi signed Sy gned Syste stem

No U/G Ra No U/G Raceway ceways o

  • n Do

Documents cuments

Electrical Analysi Electrical Analysis All wires through Canopy Structure

Power from room 12 Power from room 126 on Main Concourse 6 on Main Concourse

App Approx

  • x. 27

. 275’-0 5’-0”

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

Goal Goals Electrical Analysi Electrical Analysis

Design El Design Electrical ectrical Panel Panel within Retail within Retail Building Building Provide Cost Data for New Distribution Provide Cost Data for New Distribution

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

Alternative Design Alternative Design

Pan Panels Located in St ls Located in Storage R

  • rage Room,
  • om, 150B

B

1-1/4” Underg

nderground PV nd PVC Co Condui nduit to t to 480 Panel Panel

Electrical Analysi Electrical Analysis

T T

  • R

R B B RB RB-2 RB RB-1

Storage age, 1 150B 50B

RB- RB-1 480Y/ Y/277V , V , 3F/4W RB- RB-2 208Y/ Y/120V , V , 3F/4W Transformer Transformer 15kVA kVA 100A 50A

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

Designed System vs. Pr Designed System vs. Prop

  • pose
  • sed De

Designed S signed System stem

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

$22 $22,700 ,700 Tota Total $8,900

Material

$13,800

Labor Total Description

De Designe signed S System Co stem Cost Su st Summar mmary

$22 $22,700 ,700 Tota Total $8,900

Material

$13,800

Labor Total Description

De Designe signed S System Co stem Cost Su st Summar mmary

$13 $13,900 ,900 Tota Total $11,500

Material

$2,400

Labor Total Description

Alternati ernative System C ve System Cost Summ st Summary ary

$13 $13,900 ,900 Tota Total $11,500

Material

$2,400

Labor Total Description

Alternati ernative System C ve System Cost Summ st Summary ary

Designed System vs. Pr Designed System vs. Prop

  • pose
  • sed De

Designed S signed System stem Cost Summary Cost Summary

($8,800) ($8,800)

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

Designed System vs. Pr Designed System vs. Prop

  • pose
  • sed De

Designed S signed System stem Pr Project Impacts

  • ject Impacts

Decrease in coordination with other trades for electrical branch conduits installed through main concourse per original design. Ease of electrical system maintenance during

  • wner operation.

Decrease in amount of conduit and wire needed (labor savings). Less voltage drop experienced on branch circuits. Ease of expansion. Cost savings of $8,800. Disadvantages Advantages

Pro Propos

  • sed Al

ed Alte ternati rnative Sys e System em Des Design gn

Decrease in coordination with other trades for electrical branch conduits installed through main concourse per original design. Ease of electrical system maintenance during

  • wner operation.

Decrease in amount of conduit and wire needed (labor savings). Less voltage drop experienced on branch circuits. Ease of expansion. Cost savings of $8,800. Disadvantages Advantages

Pro Propos

  • sed Al

ed Alte ternati rnative Sys e System em Des Design gn

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

Designed System vs. Pr Designed System vs. Prop

  • pose
  • sed De

Designed S signed System stem Conclusion Conclusion

O&M Value to Owner O&M Value to Owner Su Substa tant ntial Cost Savings ial Cost Savings No A No Addit ditional Lo Load o ad on O Over erall S all System em

Pr Propose

  • posed D

Distribut stribution…

  • n…

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

Project Overview Project Overview Tech Technic nical Analyses l Analyses Steel Ta l Tape pered C d Colu lumn A Analysis is Streamlining Structural St Streamlining Structural Steel eel Design and Construction Design and Construction Electr ectrica ical D Distribut stribution Ana

  • n Analysis

is Summary and Concl Summary and Conclusions sions Acknowledgements knowledgements Clarif arificat ication ions & Question & Questions Presentation Outline Presentation Outline

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

“Ro “Round nding Th ing Thir ird”

Steel Steel Design & C Design & Construct nstruction

  • n

Technology Savvy Industry Technology Savvy Industry

Computer Generated Fabrication Models CNC Equipment

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

“Ro “Round nding Th ing Thir ird”

Steel Steel Design & C Design & Construct nstruction

  • n

Current Process is Inefficient Current Process is Inefficient

  • Arch. Design
  • Arch. Design
  • Struct. De
  • Struct. Design

sign Fabrication Model Fabrication Model Sh Shop Dra Drawings Update Fabric Update Fabrication Mode ation Model Erect Erection Dwgs.

  • n Dwgs.

Update Fabrication Model Update Fabrication Model

Big Paper Trail Big Paper Trail

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

Re Researc arch

Steel Steel Design & C Design & Construct nstruction

  • n

Building Informat Building Information Modeling ( ion Modeling (BIM) IM)

“Intelligent” 3D Model Electronic Database of Project

Streamline Structural Steel Desi Streamline Structural Steel Design and gn and Construction through Computer Modeling Construction through Computer Modeling

Mandated by GSA for all future projects (2006)

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

Rese sear arch ch Q Ques estio tions

Steel Steel Design & C Design & Construct nstruction

  • n

Reduce W Reduce Waste ste Cha Challe llenges nges Imp Implementation ementation

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

Method Methodol

  • logy
  • gy

Steel Steel Design & C Design & Construct nstruction

  • n

Select Selective Interview Participants ive Interview Participants Literature Review of Successful Literature Review of Successful Pr Project

  • jects

Ca Case Stu se Study

Soldier Field Renovation Penn State Ballpark

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Coordinated Team Decisions made instead of delayed. Software easily exchange information. Model review instead of paper drawings. Information exchanged electronically. Different way of thinking. Fee issues with more design services. Accuracy of model. Understanding how BIM benefits project team. Interoperability. Rarely direct contact between designer and detailer. Attach screen shot of model to request for information (RFI).

Describe the ideal steel shop drawing review process. What are the barriers to implementing building information modeling (BIM) on a project? (cost, time, legal, etc.) Describe the communication techniques between the designer and detailer during the shop drawing development process.

Model maintenance and discipline. Architectural changes during approval process. Incomplete design documents. Coordination with architectural documents. Defined scope with BIM during design. Model reviews instead of drawing reviews becoming more common. Models exported directly to CNC equipment. Hand drawing to Automation. 3D shop drawing models linked to CNC equipment. 3D model given to contractors for bidding.

Describe some common problems during the development of shop drawings. Has 3D modeling/BIM changed the steel shop drawing development and review process? Have the development of steel design/shop drawings changed over the past five (5) years?

Coordinated Team Decisions made instead of delayed. Software easily exchange information. Model review instead of paper drawings. Information exchanged electronically. Different way of thinking. Fee issues with more design services. Accuracy of model. Understanding how BIM benefits project team. Interoperability. Rarely direct contact between designer and detailer. Attach screen shot of model to request for information (RFI).

Describe the ideal steel shop drawing review process. What are the barriers to implementing building information modeling (BIM) on a project? (cost, time, legal, etc.) Describe the communication techniques between the designer and detailer during the shop drawing development process.

Model maintenance and discipline. Architectural changes during approval process. Incomplete design documents. Coordination with architectural documents. Defined scope with BIM during design. Model reviews instead of drawing reviews becoming more common. Models exported directly to CNC equipment. Hand drawing to Automation. 3D shop drawing models linked to CNC equipment. 3D model given to contractors for bidding.

Describe some common problems during the development of shop drawings. Has 3D modeling/BIM changed the steel shop drawing development and review process? Have the development of steel design/shop drawings changed over the past five (5) years?

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

Case Study Case Study

Steel Steel Design & C Design & Construct nstruction

  • n

Pe Penn State Ba nn State Ballpar llpark

Model Model Created Created in Re in Revit Structure tructure 2 Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

75’-0”

Roof Level Framing Plan
  • 1’-6”
Field Level Foundation Plan

120’-6” 1

W14X90
  • 0’-10”
Concourse Level Framing Plan
  • 1’-6”
Field Level Foundation Plan

15’-8” 1

W14X43

75’-0”

Roof Level Framing Plan
  • 1’-6”
Field Level Foundation Plan

120’-6” 1

W14X132
  • 0’-8 1/2”
Concourse Level Framing Plan
  • 1’-6”
Field Level Foundation Plan

15’-9 1/2” 1

W14X43

75’-0”

Roof Level Framing Plan
  • 14’-6”
Concourse Level Framing Plan

118’-6” 1

W14X90

Top Offset Top Level Base Offset Base Level Length Quantity Column Description

Penn State Ballpark Structural Column Schedule 75’-0”

Roof Level Framing Plan
  • 1’-6”
Field Level Foundation Plan

120’-6” 1

W14X90
  • 0’-10”
Concourse Level Framing Plan
  • 1’-6”
Field Level Foundation Plan

15’-8” 1

W14X43

75’-0”

Roof Level Framing Plan
  • 1’-6”
Field Level Foundation Plan

120’-6” 1

W14X132
  • 0’-8 1/2”
Concourse Level Framing Plan
  • 1’-6”
Field Level Foundation Plan

15’-9 1/2” 1

W14X43

75’-0”

Roof Level Framing Plan
  • 14’-6”
Concourse Level Framing Plan

118’-6” 1

W14X90

Top Offset Top Level Base Offset Base Level Length Quantity Column Description

Penn State Ballpark Structural Column Schedule

Case Study Case Study

Steel Steel Design & C Design & Construct nstruction

  • n

RFI’s RFI’s

Model C Model Crea eated d in Revi Revit Structure 2 Structure 2

20% Related to Elevation Discrepancy

No Column Sche No Column Schedule dule

Automatically Created with BIM Software

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

Designed System vs. Pr Designed System vs. Prop

  • pose
  • sed De

Designed S signed System stem Pr Project Impacts

  • ject Impacts

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

Effects of Steel Effects of Steel Phas Phase Computer Modeling e Computer Modeling Conclusion Conclusion

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

($8,800) ($8,800)

“Co “Coming Home” ing Home” Summary and Summary and Conclusion Conclusions

Alternative Structural Column Alternative Electrical Distribution Streamlined Approach for Structural Steel

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

All-St All-Star Support ar Support Acknowl Acknowledg dgement ents

My friends and family throughout my five-year My friends and family throughout my five-year career at T career at The Pennsylvania State Univer e Pennsylvania State University. sity. Industry & A Industry & Academic Support: ademic Support:

Bettwy Electric, Ritner Steel, RNR Erection

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Jason Jason McFad McFadden en

University Park

Cons nstru tructio tion Manag Management

Pennsylvania

“ “SI SIMPLIFYING DESIGN MPLIFYING DESIGN SI SIMPLIFYING DESIGN MPLIFYING DESIGN TO CONSTRUCTION TO CONSTRUCTION TO CONSTRUCTION TO CONSTRUCTION” ”