Shoreline Master Program Periodic Update
Community Meeting December 19, 2019
Shoreline Master Program Periodic Update Community Meeting December - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Shoreline Master Program Periodic Update Community Meeting December 19, 2019 Agenda A. 6:00-7:00pm Staff will provide a brief overview of the SMP, the changes being recommended to City Council, and respond to questions about the changes -
Community Meeting December 19, 2019
A. 6:00-7:00pm Staff will provide a brief overview of the SMP, the changes being recommended to City Council, and respond to questions about the changes
Community Council
B. 7:00-8:00pm Discussion regarding the existing SMP and ideas on how to address those concerns
C. Next Steps
Public Waters SMP Jurisdiction
!◄
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 w i n 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
~
Current Code: Proposed Code:
Maxim um Length for piers., 150 feet, but
p_i~.r.~
~
'.~.~-~ ,
extending farther Y.i'.~.!~
~ , ~ ~ r~
than
adjacen
~
p_i~.r.~
: ~
'.~.~-~
.. ~ !
.~,
fin
,
gers ancl attached ,or docks must derirnnistrate that they
will not ha.ve an adverse impact on floats
navigation
26 feet for ells 20
feet for fingers and
~
d
eddng attached to a. p_i_
~.r.
Maxirn111rn tength.
for pi- ers, do~ks, ell
fing rs: a11d atta .!led floats
No loo "r than the ayera~e of th
e
adj acept nej ~bborjn~ .iiern or l
50 feet, whic:brn:r j. lrs.s excegt
w , ·
s jttiu~ 911 the 'lakcbed cannot b
e
ach j
1
cyecl wit11ia
(S e
.Plates 47 and 4 AfB)
lb
If · h e
lh a !.horeline vari ·
· ' . f IQG/4 nf d1 av ra
ehih , .
11 nol exi::ecd 150 r
tending farther u1 crward than 11dJt1el;!A fl~'ffi tlf eel!:; up to I
0% ms .
rs or
r ks mm;l tlemons.tro.tc #nit-th y
\I. ]l no• have an a,dvct 'e impact on niivi_giU]on. The I
en~
lri n
h 1.
[
gr dock ,hall he
m
easured from 1
he furt'1c§L l11ndw::ir
I
pojrpl gf!hc
OH\ltiM.
20 fei:t for fi11gtra ami float de,ck:ing aUadmed io p11;r
Current Code: Proposed Code:
Minim um W
ate1 r Dep~h1
for e lls
an Hoa:t de k ing a
tt h
ed t a
E!~-
~
be in
water
wffil1
depths
(9) f e or
gr, eat,
e
:r at the~
:~-
~~!
~
.... en of
the
'·
1
n g
er Must be 'in water wffil1 depths
□ fe
eater a the
I a ndward
end of the
float
M!•
;,.,
.,
w,uer 11,p1h r,,.11, '"" ""' I
M " ' h
,,o., ,r ,;,.
(9) r,., •• •
,h , ''""'"'"' .,
r
io ,.1
1
..
l!<' ~oi;· l,ifi, • alt1;1.;f1
1;!d ta f;l pii;!r
~iust ~ @ iH
Wllt@r wJ1h rl 9P.-.lu e
f IQ W@I er :gi-eAA@r et 11l@ IB1id\r;rfu~ @n~ ef
.-.lu! :Qeu
Ma ·imum Length for piers, docks, ells, ~2 1
2111;!::l !b1111 1 bs:: ilV !i:rll!;!i: 2f th1: ;,uim.!i:
□
l D!i:ii;bb~i[illi; 12i1:1~ Q[ 150 feet, wbii;b!::vs::i: iii l~::ts !::,!1!.!i:~1
fingers and attached floats
iwhl:lla wat!,;r Llcpth adcquatc to i:irncnt hoals lrnm smin1.: 011 lhc lahchcd cannot h!,; ::Kh1 cvcd with in (See Plate~ 4 7 and 48A/B) (ffieavcrn~c IL'H~tfl ot m.-1
!i:llhorn1~ i:i1crs. it ma:z: exte11d to a maximum of 150'. Tfa len gth
exceeding 150 feet is reguircd to meet adeguate depth a shoreline variance shall be rcguirod. B½:li- ~ Piers or docks mav extend UQ to a maximum of 10% of the average of the adjacent neighboring giers (see Plates 47 and 48A/B} but shall not exceed 150 feet. Piers or docks extending further waterward than fla,jflee11~ l'ieH! er fleelis U[! to I 0% more than adjacent [!iers or docks must demonstrate #te+-th ey will not have an adverse impact 011 navigation. The length of a l!i!.[ Q[ ~k!s;~ sbi!II b!. w~miml fr!l lll !hi:: fu[!J11:§! l111idw11rd 1wi1:1t !ltlh!i: Ql:!WM 26 feet for ells 20 feet for fingers and t1oa.t decking attached to a pier
Current Code: Proposed Code:
.P..!
!.i.~9~ or -
~
~~g.'..~.9
. ~ .
.P..i.!.~ shall not be tr,
eated with
pentachlorophenol,
creosot.e, chroma ed coppe
r arsenat (CC ) or comp. rably toxk compounds
Firc.t ~P l'IT nilinn for ~ , iPr m linrl- ~11;:::ill h P ln.r;:ii Pri nn rln,~pr h;:::in ·
M~.
~~-
~ .
91.~ .. ~
~
ar, e not perrnit ed when a P.!~
.~
~:~
. ~
property fil.
A mooring buoy may be used to provide moorage space in lieu of a pier or dock A rnoorage buoy is not
pcrmi. tted if the subject property contains a pier or a dock No more than one (1) mooring buoy is permitted per detac- hed dwelling unit. Water craft moored to a moorage buoy may be no doser than 30 feet from the OITWM and mu t have adequate water depth to prevent a moored boat from. resting on the lakcbed.
l Moo rage buoys sha11 be in T:;ater depths of
nine (9) feet or greater based on ordinary high water, unless the U.S. AxFB:y Coff)s ofEegineeP.l ae€i tee Wafiaiegton Det9artmeat of
lt}sl:l asc4 Wildt.ii@ a.we ap13roved ae
ahtwm.1te B l:'0B o
sal .
Pier PiJings and Mooragc Piles Pier Pilings ander moorage piles shall not be t.-eated with pentachlorophenol creosote, chromated copper arsenate (C A) or comparably toxic compounds irst et ofJ2i£Lpilin gs for a pier or dock hall be located no closcr than 18 feet from OHWM
than the end of the pier or dock ?rloontge Bttoys aFe ROE F'@rFHiHed, " hes EL ~EeF ar Hoch. is tee8·
te.el BH .a sulajeet r,ropel4)
Maximum two (2) moorage pile per detached dwelling unit, including exi,tii1g piles axim um four (4) moorage piles for joint use piers or docks. , including existing piles
Current Code: Proposed Code: Reason for Amendment: Federal or State agencies do not have firm dimensional standards but rather use biological analysis to approve deviations from current SMP standards. Applications would be required to comply with No Net Loss Mitigation Sequencing regulations in 83.360 KZC, which establishes complex and generally unattainable compliance, given the principle requirements must pursue avoidance and minimization. Applications are only allowed to seek variation to dimensional standards of pier width, area, and
the first and primary mitigation analysis criteria. The current code was not required by Ecology in the 2010 SMP Comprehensive Amendments. Removal of the section keeps regulation authority local. Result of Amendment: Pier dimensional standards in 83.270.4(a) are applied and administered consistently across the City shoreline. see 83.270.4(b) Delete section
Current Code: Proposed Code:
Maximum Number One (1), freestanding1
per _ q_~~~! Q
.~-~-
~'.ll,~_ll_
i_ r
:i:g _
_ _ ~_r:,1 _ it Two, (2), jet ski llifts or one (
1 }
fiul
lly g
rnted platform
lift per dletaciliedld we_lling _ _
1_nit One (1), boat _ _ lift ca opy per ~
,~J~. .
9.~V.~J
l_ i[.1.9. unit
.............
Maximum umber GRe-Two (-l-l.) freestanding or deck-mounted boat lift§. per detached dwelling unit Two (2) jet ski lifts or one (1) fully grated platform lift per detached dwelling unit One ( l) boat lift canopy per detached dwelling unit
Current Code: Proposed Code:
5} If the applicant is making an ?.l~~r.~ti9.~ to the pr.ir::r:i?ry?.tr.'::'c::~
1 ~ ~ ~ ' the cost of which exceeds 50 percent of the~
E3.El?.c::~r::r:i~~!<::.9.?~ of the structure or constructing a new pr.i':!.l<'lr.Y.?!~
'~
<::.t~
T
E3., the following existing structures ':!.I~?
~
be removed or other\,vise brought into conformance: a) Nonconforming §IC::C::E:l??l?.ry structures located in the required ?~9.T
E3.l1
iri§!?E3.t~ci<::.~, including decks, patios or similar improvements; b) Additional pitc:ir or -
~C><::.~ located on the subject property in the RSA or RMA zone; and
c) Covered ~(?.<'If. moorage structure located on the subject property in the RSA or RMA zone; except for ~
(?.<'l~
canopies that comply with KZC 83_ 270(9)
5) If the applicant i making an alteration to the primary tructure the co t of which exceed 50 percent
tru ture mu t be remo ed or otherwi e brought into conformance: a)
patio .,, or imilar impro ement · b)
, including o rwater deck , pier flare , and tair , or imilar improvement : except that exi ting boat launche for non- motorized boat mav be continued. and moorage buoy may be continued if e tabli hed prior to 1978 and applicable county, federal and tate agency permit were approved.
£-&)
Additional pi r or dock locat don th ubject propetty.._ . ..a. T.a..a h
..;:;...a.a.a.aa..a..aa...n
=o=n
"'"-
..;;; c.,..o.a..a
n.a..
fo=r
..a.
m =i = n .. g
...,.p""'i
......_ r_..o-'-
r..;:;
d=o..aa.
c=- k mu t be r ed in the R
Current Code: Proposed Code:
83.170 Shoreline Environments, Permitted and Prohibited Uses and Activities Chart
IE! ID SHARE
The chart is coded according to the following legend.
SD
= Substantial Develo~ment1
cu
= Conditional Use Urban
Residential Residential
Urban Natural Aquatic Conservancy
Mixed X =
Prohibited; the use is not eligible for a
Variance or Conditional Use Permit
Footnotes listed at end of KZC 83170 (end of chart) SHORELINE USE
B
unch
(for m
rized
boats)
X X X X cu
Boat la unch
(for n
SD
SD
SD SD SD
B
fer 111eleliml lleo!s) or for exp
a n
sio
n
sting b
launch fer 111e1efi~
e~ lien~.
X X X X cu
BeHI IHMHel: fl'8F Hem11eleli~@tl eeHls)
St} St} St}
w
St}
Current Code: Proposed Code: Interpretation 12-6
n.
Pier bumpers ar, e permitted if they meet the foll.ow·ing standards: Maximum pier hum.per width aU
center_ preferably .
lined up with the piles. Bmupers may not extend into the water more than 1.5 feet below the OHWM elevation. The number of bump rs allowed i
· the minimu.m necessary to prev nt a boat from
going u.nder a pier along the mooring lie up area. Bumper~ may
pcrmanent]y moored. A
limited umber or bumpers may al o be pcrmiu d in a de ignated tic-up area or
gue t moorag .
Current Code: Proposed Code:
Current code provides two incentive options for removal of solid bulkheads: 1) at least 75%, or 2) at least 15. Each option carries a setback reduction option. See KZC 83.380.
Reduction Allowance Shoreline Setback Reduction Options Standard Reduct\on ()J1j 11. 25 Residential - L {A), (fl) and (J) n,·i,·onmcol (mill, ]5 fl.
n .
$etback) setback)
Presence of nonstructural or wft Reduce requi red setback by l5 Reduce required setback by l 5
s □ 'l c turalshoreline stabilization percentage points, or in cases feet measures located ac , below, or within
\\11ere 1 }1e required setback is
fi ve (5) feel landward oflhe lake··
60 feel or gre~ter. red1.1ce OHWM along al le.isl 75 p re nt of setback by 30 loot the linear lake frontage of the su1:i·ect
l shoreline stabilization measure and subs.cquent restoration of the shorelitie lo a natural
crca.li on or cnham:cmcnt of ncmshore shallow-water habitar consistent with the , oft suuctural shoreline stabilization provisions in KZC 83.300. Thii. option cannot be u,wd in conjunction with Options 2 ~
~ below.
1
:;i•ms; •~ i!bl!" !i in O[!!i11n I !iX
~!illl R£!l11~5: ~11 irs.d ~s;Ll!i1~k h~ 10 Rs:d11
!,ls; '!i'luirs.1
1 ~!i:!2":la"- !!~ l Q ~IS.llllii ~! l!.il~! so l!!.L:!;S.ll! ~
1f!b1.: lin~sr
I?~[t~!Jl~ .
FJ~ J2!;2i!JI~ ~
1[ ia
s;;1::s:s
ful...
lake frontage of the subject 11:roec1 1y. ,,11 crc the regu ire-d. setback is ll1is ontion c,annor Mused in 60 feet or gre~ter. reduce
c:nnjunc:lifm wilh Q"1•l~n I ~W!i;: or
~ eil!:!!c k b~·
2Q r~-ef
Q12liWl' J. ~
S.ll ~ bs.lS.l~