SHIPPING IN AN EVER CHANGING ENVIRONMENT Presentation at COCERAL - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

shipping in an ever changing
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

SHIPPING IN AN EVER CHANGING ENVIRONMENT Presentation at COCERAL - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SHIPPING IN AN EVER CHANGING ENVIRONMENT Presentation at COCERAL 2013 General Assembly, Panel discussion Staying ahead of the curve Athens May 10 th , 2013 George A. Gratsos Ph.D. President of Hellenic Chamber of Shipping Plus a


slide-1
SLIDE 1

SHIPPING IN AN EVER CHANGING ENVIRONMENT

Presentation at COCERAL 2013 General Assembly, Panel discussion “Staying ahead of the curve” – Athens May 10th, 2013 George A. Gratsos Ph.D. President of Hellenic Chamber of Shipping

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Plus ça change plus c’est la même chose

and

“The This Time its Different Syndrome”

(Reinhart-Rogoff ) GAG

slide-3
SLIDE 3

BASIC MARKET PRINCIPLES

Economies are made up of people. The law of supply and demand always works. Markets will always work to lower costs and create more competitive products and services while providing reasonable returns to all participants. Expensive products or services will invariably fail. Legislated inefficiencies distort market mechanisms producing a higher cost environment thus destroying productivity and jobs.

The modern world is a global market.

GAG

slide-4
SLIDE 4

BASIC PREMISES FOR SEABORNE TRADE

To sell you must produce or provide goods and services at prices

  • thers are willing to buy them at.

Countries aim for cost efficiency for their industries in order to promote growth and employment. Input costs affect cost efficiency. To prosper, shipping must provide, on average, cost efficient transport to receivers. Shipyards are a “freight market destruction mechanism” for importing countries in order to maintain reasonable freight rates.

4

GAG

slide-5
SLIDE 5

FUNDAMENTAL ECONOMIC PARAMETERS OF SHIPPING

  • When shipping provides low transport cost services to the receivers, it

is profitable.

  • Cargoes will always be available for shipment at a price. New, more

cost and energy efficient ships will always be preferred.

  • To be successful, all input costs of ship investments must be cost
  • competitive. A cost plus mentality and legislated inefficiencies are

therefore inappropriate.

  • Shipping

is a variously cyclical, self correcting business. Understanding the cyclicality

  • f

the freight market and ship value fluctuations is very important.

  • After any stimulus shipping eventually balances around a level at

which all players are making reasonable returns.

GAG

slide-6
SLIDE 6

COST EFFICIENCY OF SHIPPING

  • Dry bulk shipping’s cost efficiency improved about 33%
  • ver the last 31 years through larger, more cost efficient
  • ships. The average size of the fleet grew from 35.500 tdw

in 1981 to 70.600 tdw in 2012.

  • To improve cost efficiency, ship sizes are constantly
  • increasing. All ship categories suffer bracket creep.
  • Parcel

trade in bigger bulk carriers improves cost competitiveness.

  • Smaller, more flexible ships attain a measure of cost

efficiency by reducing the ballast leg (triangulation).

6

GAG

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

GAG

COST EFFECTIVENESS OF DIFFERENT SIZE BULK CARRIERS CARRYING A FULL CARGO FROM DAMPIER (AUSTRALIA) TO QUINDAO (CHINA) ON A ROUND TRIP BASIS

2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 '000 DWT $/TON

HIGH NB SHIP PRICES LOW NB SHIP PRICES PMX CAPE VLOC VLOC+ SUPRA HANDY KAMSARMAX 33% more cost efficient in 31 years or 1.065% PA FLEET AVG SIZE IN 1981: 35,500DWT FLEET AVG SIZE IN 2012: 70,600DWT

  • REV. 04-2013
slide-8
SLIDE 8

SHIP SIZE vs. FLEXIBILITY

  • Bigger ships fit into less ports and are limited by waterway

restrictions.

  • Port infrastructure expansion is easier justified in ports of

projected high cargo throughput. Accommodating bigger ships in new, strategically located ports improves a country’s cost structure making it more cost competitive by encouraging Parcel trade. Ships must be appropriate for the envisaged trade.

8

GAG

slide-9
SLIDE 9

SHIP ENERGY EFFICIENCY

More energy efficient ships are a reality and will be “game changers”. They are more energy efficient at any speed compared to existing ships. The basic technologies have been known, tried and tested for decades, if not centuries. The basic trade-off is cargo intake revenue

  • vs. bunker consumption cost for every ship segment, in order to

increase profitability. The ratio BDI/BP is key. Energy efficient bulk carriers and tankers are about 20%-30% more fuel efficient than ships presently operating. For a 75.000 tdw ship this represents a difference in average transport costs of about $3,000/day at bunkers costing $700/ton over a trading

  • year. This income differential will depress the earning capacity and prices
  • f existing similar tonnage going forward. The NPV of such differences

in fuel consumption represent between $6m-$8m over the life of a Panamax.

9

GAG

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Hull form is very important

  • A racing skiff does ~10 kn with 1 M-P
  • A light rowboat does ~2.5 kn with 1 M-P

Slow speed engines and propellers

“Propeller efficiency usually increases with increasing diameter” … “A reduction of the RPM tends to be beneficial” “Muntjewerft in 1983 mentions a possible increase of propulsive efficiency of 10 to15 pct” (PNA- 1988) In 1981 Burmeister & Wain produced their MKIII 65.000 tdw Panamax bulk carrier with improved hull, engine and a slow turning 6.9 m diameter propeller doing 82 RPM @75% MCR, thus creating a very energy efficient ship. The ship at scantling draft traded at 13.5 kn consuming 26 t/day. Its consumption was about 25% less than other ships built at the time.

THE TECHNOLOGIES HAVE BEEN KNOWN FOR A LONG TIME

10

GAG

slide-11
SLIDE 11

FREIGHT MARKETS AND SHIP PRICES

Freight market fluctuations are dictated by supply and demand imbalances. So are ship prices. “Eighty per cent of the monthly (ship) price

change can be explained by changing spot earnings” (Clarkson S.I.W., Issue 926 July 2, 2010).

The market is presently overtonaged. This will change and eventually rebalance, fluctuating around a reasonably profitable level.

11

GAG

slide-12
SLIDE 12

SHIPPING INVESTMENTS – ALIGNING INTERESTS

Shipowners invest in expensive, long term assets. For the right ship, cargoes will always be available, at a price. Freight rates are established by the supply of ships and the demand for transport. To be successful, shipowners must be good judges of the type of ship the market will require going forward and its price “Caveat emptor”. Newbuilding ship prices over the years have had an inflation adjusted low below which they are unlikely to drop. Scrap price fluctuates around 65% of the new steel price. These two parameters could define a base line for ship valuations. Understanding the needs of the cargo receiver is important. The receiver is the shipowner’s long term counterpart, not the charterer.

GAG

slide-13
SLIDE 13

TIMING OF PURCHASES MUST ALSO BE RIGHT

GAG

73000 TDW PANAMAX REFERENCE PRICE (INDICATIVE)

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 NB 10 YR 20YR VESSEL'S AGE PRICE IN MILLION US $ 4.8*- SECOND HAND HIGH MARKET SCRAP SECOND HAND EXPECTED DEPRECIATED TO SCRAP NEWBUILDING AT LAST LOW (ADJUSTED FOR INFLATION to 2012) SECOND HAND LOW MARKET *SCRAP:12000 LT x $400/TONNE NEWBUILDING AT HIGH MARKET (2007 HIGHS)

REV:12/12

ACTUAL SALES 2007-2008 ACTUAL SALES 2012 HIGH FINANCIAL RISK LOW FINANCIAL RISK

slide-14
SLIDE 14

SHIP FINANCING

«Το διρ εξαμαπηείν οςκ ανδπόρ ζοθού»

(A second similar mistake is not the sign of a wise man)

Modern, flexible cross trading, energy efficient ships will always find cargoes at a price. The price depends on market levels. Ships built for dedicated trades (industrial shipping) will rarely be able to compete

  • utside their specific trade. These ships would most probably require period cover.

Charter cover is not a real security. In a bad market most charterers renegotiate

  • r default. Recent experience highlights a trend that has been evident for decades.

Shipowners have a much higher survival rate than charterers. Financiers who insist in employment “security” (charters) boycott the shipping investments they finance. They should instead rely primarily on the abilities and judgment of their client, the shipowner. Over the years the attrition rate

  • f charterers has been much higher than that of shipowners.

Shipowners use the same or better caliber chartering clerks than charterers.

14

GAG

slide-15
SLIDE 15

SCRAPPING REDUCES THE FLEET

  • Tankers and bulk carriers have a finite economic life which depends mainly on

the cost of repairs to keep them in service.

  • The higher the repair costs and the lower the freight rates the sooner they will
  • scrap. Attempts to accelerate this process through by imposing age limits lead

to poor maintenance, increasing accidents.

  • World scrapping capacity in 2012 reached 59 million tons for all ships.

Scrapping capacity changes with demand. 2012, bulk carriers scraping was 4.6% or about 30 million tdw. The historic high of 5.5% PA was in 1986. This is indicative of a very low market.

GAG

slide-16
SLIDE 16

SUPPLY DEMAND BALANCE

Dry bulk ton mile demand is expected to increase between 6%-7% in 2013. Dry bulk shipping deliveries in 2013 are expected to be 10.5% of the

  • fleet. A further 7% deliveries are estimated for 2014 but this may

increase as more eco ships are being ordered To this one must add the ton mile capability of the slow steaming

16

GAG fleet which is estimated to be about 20%- 25% in order to reach average historical trading speeds which correlate to average freight To balance supply with demand a lot of tonnage will need to be scrapped. The freight market will most probably not recover until end 2014. We still have a way to go. markets.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

TONNE MILE SUPPLY/DEMAND PROJECTION PER UNIT OF WORLD GDPx1.85

2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000 22000 24000

1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 (E) 2014 (E) 2015 (E)

DATE BILLION TONNE MILES 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

TOTAL BTM FLEET CAPABILITY IN TONNE MILLES IAMRTCI

  • FLEET PROJECTION : Newbuilding Deliveries 65% of annual average programmed to 31/12/2012 - NO scrapping
  • TM PROJECTION : Tonne -miles Projection per unit of world GDP x1.85

SOURCE: BDI , DREWRY SHIPPING INSIGHT, SBT DRY BULK SHIPPING, IMF, RS PLATOU

OUTPUT GAP

Rev.02-2013

Factor of 0.9 because of slow steaming adjustment and extensive hot short term inactivity Factor of 0.95 because of slow steaming adjustment and extensive hot short term inactivity

17

GAG

slide-18
SLIDE 18

AGE DISTRIBUTION OF THE BULK CARRIER FLEET

The bulk carrier fleet and particularly the more popular Capesizes, Panamax/Post Panamax and Supermax fleets are very young. Over 80% of these fleets are younger than 15 years old. New, eco design ships are only starting to be delivered now. If overtonaging persists this will prompt scrapping

  • f younger ships.

18

GAG

slide-19
SLIDE 19

DRY BULK ORDERBOOK 2012 – 2014+, SSY 12/2012 DWT Range

  • Nr. Of Ships

DWT % of Fleet for 2012 – 2014+ 2012 – 2014+ 2013 2014 10.000 - 40.000 401 13,500,000 11.1% 5.2% 40.000 - 60.000 289 15,600,000 9.5% 1.9% 60.000 - 100.000 630 49,100,000 21.2% 6.7% 100.000 - 220.000 182 33,100,000 10.7% 3.9% 220.000 + 37 11,600,000 18.4% 4.1% Totals 1,539 122,900,000 13.8% 4.4% SBT ESTIMATED DELIVERIES IN TDW 70.0 50.0

DRY BULK ORDERBOOK 2012-2014+, SSY (12/2012)

10.000 - 40.000 11% 40.000 - 60.000 13% 60.000 - 100.000 40% 100.000 - 220.000 27% 220.000 + 9% SOURCE: SSY (DEC 2012)

19

GAG

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Age of ship - Total Fleet

0 - 14 77% 15 - 19 12% 20 - 24 5% 25 - ABOVE 6% > 20 : 11% SOURCE: SSY (DEC 2012)

Age of 10.000 - 40.000 DWT Fleet

0 - 14 60% 15 - 19 10% 20 - 24 4% 25 - ABOVE 26% > 20 : 30% SOURCE: SSY (DEC 2012)

Age of 40.000 - 60.000 DWT Fleet

0 - 14 80% 15 - 19 10% 20 - 24 3% 25 - ABOVE 7% > 20 : 10% SOURCE: SSY (DEC 2012)

Age of 60.000 - 100.000 DWT Fleet

0 - 14 80% 15 - 19 11% 20 - 24 5% 25 - ABOVE 4% > 20 : 9% SOURCE: SSY (DEC 2012)

Age of 100.000 - 220.000 DWT Fleet

0 - 14 82% 15 - 19 12% 20 - 24 5% 25 - ABOVE 1% > 20 : 6% SOURCE: SSY (DEC 2012)

Age of 220.000 - ABOVE DWT Fleet

0 - 14 60% 15 - 19 21% 20 - 24 16% 25 - ABOVE 3% > 20 :19% SOURCE: SSY (DEC 2012)

20

GAG

slide-21
SLIDE 21

DEMAND FOR TRANSPORT PARAMETERS

The world economy appears to have bottomed out. Emerging markets, which account for about 65% of bulk trades are now recovering. Ton mile growth projections will continue increasing, albeit at a decreasing rate of growth until emerging markets mature. This though will take time. Possibly decades. The grain trade appears to have a steady but slow trend line increase with fluctuations going forward. Even though it accounts for only about 9%

  • f total ton mile demand, its effect on shipping may be greater because ships stay in port longer.

It is possible that the grain trade rate of increase will be greater going forward. Reason: population, wealth increase and dietary improvements (1 kg chicken needs 2 kg grain, 1 kg hog needs 4 kg grain, 1 kg beef needs 7 kg grain). Agricultural land is limited in areas of high population concentrations. Industrial raw materials:China’s steel production uses only about 13.3% scrap whereas the U.S. and Europe use between 55.0% to 91.0% Chinese, Indian and other emerging economies iron ore and coal imports will decrease with increased recycling. Efficiencies will further reduce the rate of growth of bulk imports. New sources of raw materials may change ton mile factors. 21

GAG

slide-22
SLIDE 22

TONNE MILES OF DRY BULK CARGOES PER UNIT OF WORLD GDP 1983 -2013, (GDP1989=100)

50.00 55.00 60.00 65.00 70.00 75.00 80.00 85.00 90.00 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 (E)

YEAR

REAL BTM / WGDP '84-'02 REAL BTM / WGDP '03-'13

  • Rev. 02-2013

22

GAG

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

WORLD GRAIN TRADE

50 100 150 200 250 300 86/87 87/88 88/89 89/90 90/91 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 PERIOD QUANTITY (Million Tones)

USA CANADA AUSTRALIA ARGENTINA EU-15 OTHERS WORLD

EXPORTERS :

SOURCE:SSY, Update:03/13

GAG

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

TONNE MILES OF GRAIN CARGOES PER UNIT OF WORLD GDP 1983 -2013

0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 (E)

YEAR

REAL BTM / WGDP '84-'05 REAL BTM / WGDP '05-'13

  • Rev. 04-2013

y = 0.1021x + 4.8351 max variance ±3.0% y = -0.2144x + 12.021 max variance +5.0% -10.0% SOURCE: IMF, RS PLATOU

GAG

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

GAG

PRIMARY ENERGY CONSUMPTION IN MILLION TONNES OIL EQUIVALENT PER UNIT OF WORLD GDP, (GDP1989=100)

55 60 65 70 75 80 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

DATE

SOURCE: BP STATISTICAL REVIEW , IMF

slide-26
SLIDE 26

PER CAPITA PRIMARY ENERGY CONSUMPTION, 2000, 2005, 2010 vs PER CAPITA GDP

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 50000

PER CAPITA GDP IN US$ PRIMARY ENERGY CONSUMPTION IN Tons of Oil Equivalent

INDIA CHINA RUSSIA EUROPE JAPAN USA

  • S. KOREA

CHINA

  • S. KOREA

USA EUROPE JAPAN INDIA RUSSIA 2000 2005 2010

SOURCE: BP, CIA, IMF, Population Reference Bureau

GAG

slide-27
SLIDE 27

PER CAPITA COAL CONSUMPTION, 2000, 2005, 2010 vs PER CAPITA GDP

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 50000

PER CAPITA GDP IN US$ COAL CONSUMPTION IN Tons

INDIA CHINA RUSSIA EUROPE JAPAN USA

  • S. KOREA

CHINA

  • S. KOREA

USA EUROPE JAPAN INDIA RUSSIA 2000 2005 2010

SOURCE: BP, CIA, IMF, Population Reference Bureau

GAG

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

GAG

PER CAPITA STEEL PRODUCTION, 2000, 2005, 2010 vs PER CAPITA GDP

0.0 200.0 400.0 600.0 800.0 1000.0 1200.0 1400.0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 50000

PER CAPITA GDP IN US$ STEEL PRODUCTION IN Kg

INDIA CHINA RUSSIA EU 15 JAPAN USA

  • S. KOREA

CHINA

  • S. KOREA

USA EU 15 JAPAN INDIA RUSSIA 2000 2005 2010

SOURCE: BP, CIA, IMF, Population Reference Bureau

slide-29
SLIDE 29

CONCLUDING REMARKS

As population and economies expand, seaborne trade will continue expanding. It is very possible that the grain trade will start expanding faster in line with population growth and improving diets. As emerging economies mature, the rate of growth of seaborne trade per unit of world GDP will probably decline due to efficiencies, much as it did in the period prior to 2002. Shipping profitability will always recover after adjusting for supply/demand imbalances.

29

GAG

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Thank you

George A. Gratsos