Shell Model Far From Stability: IoI Mergers Fr ed eric Nowacki - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Shell Model Far From Stability: IoI Mergers Fr ed eric Nowacki - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Shell Model Far From Stability: IoI Mergers Fr ed eric Nowacki NUSPIN 2017, June 26 th -29 th 2017 The Archipelago of Islands of Inversion N=8 N=20 N=28 N=40 N=50 11 Li 32 Mg 42 Si 64 Cr 74 Cr Landscape of medium mass nuclei: Mergers
The Archipelago of Islands of Inversion
N=8 N=20 N=28 N=40 N=50
11Li 32Mg 42Si 64Cr 74Cr
Landscape of medium mass nuclei: Mergers
- 68 Ni
78 Ni 16 O 14 C 48 Ni 56 Ni 36 S 34 Si 32 Mg 52 Ca 48 Ca 40 Ca 22 O 42 Si 64 Cr
f7/2 g 9/2 f7/2 f5/2 g 9/2 f5/2 p 1/2 p 3/2 f7/2 p 3/2
90 Zr 80 Zr
p 1/2 g 9/2 d 5/2 p 1/2 f5/2 p 3/2
12 Be
f7/2
40 Mg 74 Cr 8 8 20 28 20 28 32 40
Z
28 28 20
N
40 8 20 14 Sn 100 50 50
Evolution of nuclear shells due to Tensor force
42Si 91Zr 78Ni 132Sn
- T. Otsuka et al.,
- Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 232502-1 (2005)
(2j> + 1)V T
j>,j′ + (2j< + 1)V T j<,j′ = 0,
reduction of spin-orbit partners splitting while filling j′ shell
Spin-orbit shell closure far from stability
- H. O.
- H. O.
Π+ Π−
14 d5/2 28 f7/2
42 14Si28
sd-pf: 42Si deformed pf-sdg: 78Ni ??? sdg-phf: 132Sn doubly magic Evolution of Z=14 from N=20 to N=28 Evolution of Z=28 from N=40 to N=50 Evolution of N=50 from Z=40 to Z=28
Spin-orbit shell closure far from stability
- H. O.
- H. O.
Π+ Π−
28 f7/2 50 g9/2
78 28Ni50
sd-pf: 42Si deformed pf-sdg: 78Ni ??? sdg-phf: 132Sn doubly magic Evolution of Z=14 from N=20 to N=28 Evolution of Z=28 from N=40 to N=50 Evolution of N=50 from Z=40 to Z=28
Spin-orbit shell closure far from stability
- H. O.
- H. O.
Π+ Π−
50 g9/2 82 h11/2
132 50 Sn82
sd-pf: 42Si deformed
78Ni ???
pf-sdg: sdg-phf:
132Sn doubly magic
Evolution of Z=14 from N=20 to N=28 Evolution of Z=28 from N=40 to N=50 Evolution of N=50 from Z=40 to Z=28
Physics around 78Ni
π υ sdg pf
60Ca PFSDG-U interaction: realistic TBME pf shell for protons and gds shell for neutrons monopole corrections ( 3N forces ) proton and neutrons gap 78Ni fixed to phenomenological derived values Calculations: excitations across Z=28 and N=50 gaps up to 5*1010 Slater Determinant basis states m-scheme code ANTOINE (non public version) J-scheme code NATHAN (parallelized version): 0.5*109 J basis states
Physics around 78Ni
π pf υ sdg
60Ca PFSDG-U interaction: realistic TBME pf shell for protons and gds shell for neutrons monopole corrections ( 3N forces ) proton and neutrons gap 78Ni fixed to phenomenological derived values Calculations: excitations across Z=28 and N=50 gaps up to 5*1010 Slater Determinant basis states m-scheme code ANTOINE (non public version) J-scheme code NATHAN (parallelized version): 0.5*109 J basis states
Neutron intruders constraints
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52
Zn
S2n (MeV) Neutron number
PFSDG-U mix Exp.
Neutron intruders constraints
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52
Zn
S2n (MeV) Neutron number
PFSDG-U mix Exp.
g9/2 d5/2
50 Zn 82
N=50 Gap + Vd5d5
Neutron intruders constraints
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52
Zn
S2n (MeV) Neutron number
PFSDG-U mix Exp. 1 2 3 46 48 50 52 54
Zn
2+ 4+ E(2+) (MeV) Neutron number
PFSDG-U NNDC RIKEN
RIKEN MINOS experiment
- C. Shand, Z. Podolyak, et al. to be published
Neutron intruders constraints
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52
Zn
S2n (MeV) Neutron number
PFSDG-U mix Exp. 1 2 3 46 48 50 52 54 56
Ge
2+ 4+ E(2+) (MeV) Neutron number
PFSDG-U NNDC RIKEN
RIKEN MINOS experiment
- M. Lettman, V. Werner, N. Pietralla, accepted in Phys. Rev. C
Neutron intruders constraints
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52
Zn
S2n (MeV) Neutron number
PFSDG-U mix Exp. 1 2 3 46 48 50 52 54 56
Ge
2+ 4+ E(2+) (MeV) Neutron number
PFSDG-U NNDC RIKEN
RIKEN MINOS experiment
- M. Lettman, V. Werner, N. Pietralla, accepted in Phys. Rev. C
Neutron intruders constraints
9 10 11 12 13 14 42 44 46 48 50
Cu
S2n (MeV) Neutron number
JUN45 PFSDG-U AME2016 ISOLTRAP
data: AME2016 and ISOLTRAP Collaboration 2017
NpNh excitations
9 10 11 12 13 14 42 44 46 48 50
Cu
S2n (MeV) Neutron number
0p0h AME2016 ISOLTRAP
theory PFSDG-U data: AME2016 and ISOLTRAP Collaboration 2017
NpNh excitations
9 10 11 12 13 14 42 44 46 48 50
Cu
S2n (MeV) Neutron number
2p2h AME2016 ISOLTRAP
theory PFSDG-U data: AME2016 and ISOLTRAP Collaboration 2017
NpNh excitations
9 10 11 12 13 14 42 44 46 48 50
Cu
S2n (MeV) Neutron number
4p4h AME2016 ISOLTRAP
theory PFSDG-U data: AME2016 and ISOLTRAP Collaboration 2017
NpNh excitations
9 10 11 12 13 14 42 44 46 48 50
Cu
S2n (MeV) Neutron number
6p6h AME2016 ISOLTRAP
theory PFSDG-U data: AME2016 and ISOLTRAP Collaboration 2017
NpNh excitations
9 10 11 12 13 14 42 44 46 48 50
Cu
S2n (MeV) Neutron number
8p8h AME2016 ISOLTRAP
theory PFSDG-U data: AME2016 and ISOLTRAP Collaboration 2017
NpNh excitations
9 10 11 12 13 14 42 44 46 48 50
Cu
S2n (MeV) Neutron number
8p8h AME2016 ISOLTRAP
theory PFSDG-U data: AME2016 and ISOLTRAP Collaboration 2017
F . N
- w
a c k i a n d I S O L T R A P C O L L A B O R A T I O N , t
- b
e p u b l i s h e d
NpNh excitations
9 10 11 12 13 14 42 44 46 48 50
Cu
S2n (MeV) Neutron number
8p8h AME2016 ISOLTRAP
theory PFSDG-U data: AME2016 and ISOLTRAP Collaboration 2017
- R. P. de Groote and the CRIS collaboration
in preparation
Spherical structure of 78Ni
Ab-initio CC predictions for 78Ni
Spherical structure of 78Ni
Spherical structure of 78Ni
- 370
- 368
- 366
- 364
- 362
- 360
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
78Ni
E (MeV) ph excitations
0+1 2+1
GS and 2+
ph in 78Ni
Spherical structure of 78Ni
- 370
- 368
- 366
- 364
- 362
- 360
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
78Ni
E (MeV) ph excitations
0+1 2+1
GS and 2+
ph in 78Ni
∼3.1
Schematic SU3 predictions
20 22 24 26 28
Z
- 5
- 4
- 3
- 2
- 1
1 2 3
MeV
0p-0h 2p-2h 4p-4h 78Ni 76Fe 74Cr
monopole + quadrupole model proton gap (5MeV) and neutron gap (5 MeV) estimates Quasi-SU3 (protons) and Pseudo-SU3 (neutrons) blocks Qs = (2q20 + 3.)b2)2/3.5 En = Gmp
n (50)−ωκ
Qm
0 (π)
15 b2
+ Qm
0 (ν)
23 b2
2 Gmp
n (50) = n ( 3.0 8 nπ f + 2.25) + ∆(n) + δp(n)
Prediction of Island of strong collectivity below 78Ni !!!
Shape coexistence in 78Ni
At first approximation, 78Ni has a double closed shell structure for GS But very low-lying competing structures From the diagonalization, the first excited states in 78Ni are :
- 0+
2 -2+ 1 predicted at 2.6-2.9 MeV and to be
deformed intruders of a rotationnal band !!! “1p1h” 2+
2 predicted at ∼ 3.1 MeV
Necessity to go beyond (fpg 9
2 d 5 2 ) LNPS
space and beyond ab-initio description Portal to a new Island of Inversion Constrained deformed HF in the SM basis (B. Bounthong, PhD Thesis, Strasbourg)
Shape coexistence in 78Ni
At first approximation, 78Ni has a double closed shell structure for GS But very low-lying competing structures From the diagonalization, the first excited states in 78Ni are :
- 0+
2 -2+ 1 predicted at 2.6-2.9 MeV and to be
deformed intruders of a rotationnal band !!! “1p1h” 2+
2 predicted at ∼ 3.1 MeV
Necessity to go beyond (fpg 9
2 d 5 2 ) LNPS
space and beyond ab-initio description Portal to a new Island of Inversion 78Ni
Shape coexistence in 78Ni
At first approximation, 78Ni has a double closed shell structure for GS But very low-lying competing structures From the diagonalization, the first excited states in 78Ni are :
- 0+
2 -2+ 1 predicted at 2.6-2.9 MeV and to be
deformed intruders of a rotationnal band !!! “1p1h” 2+
2 predicted at ∼ 3.1 MeV
Necessity to go beyond (fpg 9
2 d 5 2 ) LNPS
space and beyond ab-initio description Portal to a new Island of Inversion 78Ni
78Ni
2+
1
→ 0+
2
∆E∗ th. 0.229 Qs
- 39
BE2↓ th. 516 Qi(e.fm2) 135 from Qs Qi(e.fm2) 195 from BE2 βe
2
∼ 0.3 prolate
Shape coexistence in 78Ni
At first approximation, 78Ni has a double closed shell structure for GS But very low-lying competing structures From the diagonalization, the first excited states in 78Ni are :
- 0+
2 -2+ 1 predicted at 2.6-2.9 MeV and to be
deformed intruders of a rotationnal band !!! “1p1h” 2+
2 predicted at ∼ 3.1 MeV
Necessity to go beyond (fpg 9
2 d 5 2 ) LNPS
space and beyond ab-initio description Portal to a new Island of Inversion 78Ni p f 7
2
f 5
2
p 3
2
p 1
2
5.4 1.0 1.0 0.5 n g 9
2
d 5
2
s 1
2
g 7
2
d 3
2
7.0 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.4
Island of Deformation below 78Ni: PES’s
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 20 30 40 50 60 γ β
72Fe
0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 MeV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 20 30 40 50 60 γ β
74Fe
0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 MeV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 20 30 40 50 60 γ β
76Fe
0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 MeV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 20 30 40 50 60 γ β
70Cr
0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 MeV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 20 30 40 50 60 γ β
72Cr
0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 MeV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 20 30 40 50 60 γ β
74Cr
0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 MeV
N=46 N=48 N=50
72Fe 74Fe 76Fe 70Cr 72Cr 74Cr
Island of Deformation below 78Ni: PES’s
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 20 30 40 50 60 γ β
72Fe
0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 MeV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 20 30 40 50 60 γ β
74Fe
0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 MeV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 20 30 40 50 60 γ β
76Fe
0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 MeV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 20 30 40 50 60 γ β
70Cr
0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 MeV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 20 30 40 50 60 γ β
72Cr
0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 MeV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 20 30 40 50 60 γ β
74Cr
0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 MeV
N=46 N=48 N=50
72Fe 74Fe 76Fe 70Cr 72Cr 74Cr
E*(2+
1 )
Qs BE2↓ Qm
i
βm (MeV) (e.fm2) (e2.fm4) (e.fm2)
70Cr
0.30
- 41
420 340 0.26
72Cr
0.23
- 48
549 407 0.30
74Cr
0.24
- 51
630 552 0.39
72Fe
0.44
- 36
316 289 0.21
74Fe
0.47
- 39
330 308 0.22
76Fe
0.35
- 39
346 320 0.25 Predicted New IoI centered at 74Cr
Island of Deformation below 78Ni: PES’s
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 20 30 40 50 60 γ β
72Fe
0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 MeV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 20 30 40 50 60 γ β
74Fe
0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 MeV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 20 30 40 50 60 γ β
76Fe
0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 MeV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 20 30 40 50 60 γ β
70Cr
0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 MeV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 20 30 40 50 60 γ β
72Cr
0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 MeV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 20 30 40 50 60 γ β
74Cr
0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 MeV
N=46 N=48 N=50
72Fe 74Fe 76Fe 70Cr 72Cr 74Cr
The N=40 and N=50 IoI’s Merge
36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52
N
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
MeV
Ni (exp) Ni-Cr (lnps) Ni (pfsdg) Cr (exp) Cr (pfsdg)
64Cr 74Cr 68Ni 78Ni
Like the N=20 and N=28 IoI’s did
18 20 22 24 26 28 30
N
1 2 3 4
2
+ excitation energy in MeV Si (exp) Si (th) Mg (exp) Mg (th) Ca (exp)
32Mg 40Mg 40Ca 48Ca
Shell evolution and Tensor mechanism in mid-mass nuclei
−1 40 50 2 4 1h11/2 2d5/2 2d3/2 En ergy (MeV) (c) Neutron ESPE 2d5/2 1g7/2
- 1
1 2 3 4 40 50 2d5/2 1g7/2 2d3/2 1h11/2 2 4 (c) neutron SPE at N=51 d3/2 d5/2 s 1/2 g7/2 h11/2 40 50 Z
- T. Otsuka, et al.
- K. Sieja, et al.
- T. Otsuka, et al.
- Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 232502-1 (2005)
- Phys. Rev. C79, 064310 (2009)
- Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 012501 (2010)
Effective Single Particle Energies: Trends
34Si 42Si
7.5 5.1
- 40
- 35
- 30
- 25
- 20
- 15
- 10
14 16 20 28 32 34 40
ESPE (MeV) Neutron number
Silicium chain
d5/2 s1/2 d3/2
Effective Single Particle Energies: Trends
34Si 42Si
7.5 5.1
- 40
- 35
- 30
- 25
- 20
- 15
- 10
14 16 20 28 32 34 40
ESPE (MeV) Neutron number
Silicium chain
d5/2 s1/2 d3/2
Spin-Tensor decomposition
V =
- Vk =
- Uk.Sk
k S S′ spin-tensor components C=Central 1 1 1 1 ALS=antisymmetric spin-orbit 1 1 1 LS=spin-orbit 2 1 1 T=Tensor
Effective Single Particle Energies: Trends
34Si 42Si
7.5 5.1
- 40
- 35
- 30
- 25
- 20
- 15
- 10
14 16 20 28 32 34 40
ESPE (MeV) Neutron number
Silicium chain
d5/2 s1/2 d3/2
∆ (d 5
2 -d 3 2 ) filling f 7 2 between 34Si and 42Si
G matrix SDPF-U diff. Tot
- 3.15
- 2.38
+0.77 Central +0.24
- 0.11
- 0.35
Vector
- 0.27
+0.55 +0.82 LS
- 0.11
+0.11 +0.22 ALS
- 0.16
+0.44 +0.60 Tensor
- 2.65
- 2.77
+0.12
Effective Single Particle Energies: Trends
68Ni 78Ni
8.6 4.9
- 30
- 20
- 10
20 28 32 38 40 50
ESPE (MeV) Neutron number
f5/2 p3/2 p1/2 g9/2 f7/2
Effective Single Particle Energies: Trends
68Ni 78Ni
8.6 4.9
- 30
- 20
- 10
20 28 32 38 40 50
ESPE (MeV) Neutron number
f5/2 p3/2 p1/2 g9/2 f7/2
∆ (f 7
2 -f 5 2 ) filling g 9 2 between 68Ni and 78Ni
G matrix PFSDG-U diff. Tot
- 3.21
- 3.70
- 0.49
Central
- 0.28
- 0.23
+0.05 Vector
- 0.081
- 1.09
- 1.01
LS
- 0.081
- 0.65
- 0.57
ALS 0.0
- 0.44
- 0.44
Tensor
- 2.84
- 2.38
+0.46
Effective Single Particle Energies: Trends
68Ni 78Ni
8.6 4.9
- 30
- 20
- 10
20 28 32 38 40 50
ESPE (MeV) Neutron number
f5/2 p3/2 p1/2 g9/2 f7/2
∆ (f 7
2 -f 5 2 ) filling g 9 2 between 68Ni and 78Ni
G matrix PFSDG-U diff. Tot
- 3.21
- 3.70
- 0.49
Central
- 0.28
- 0.23
+0.05 Vector
- 0.081
- 1.09
- 1.01
LS
- 0.081
- 0.65
- 0.57
ALS 0.0
- 0.44
- 0.44
Tensor
- 2.84
- 2.38
+0.46
Effective Single Particle Energies: Trends
120Sn 132Sn
5.2 5.9
- 20
- 10
50 56 64 66 70 82
ESPE (MeV) Neutron number
g9/2 d5/2 g7/2 s1/2 d3/2 h11/2
Effective Single Particle Energies: Trends
120Sn 132Sn
5.2 5.9
- 20
- 10
50 56 64 66 70 82
ESPE (MeV) Neutron number
g9/2 d5/2 g7/2 s1/2 d3/2 h11/2
∆ (g 9
2 -g 7 2 ) filling h 11 2 between 120Sn and 132Sn
Vlowk NNSP diff. Tot
- 2.15
+0.89 +3.04 Central
- 0.034
+0.30 +0.33 Vector +0.12 +1.55 +1.43 LS
- 0.038
- 0.06
- 0.022
ALS +0.49 +1.61 +1.12 Tensor
- 2.30
- 0.96
+1.34
Effective Single Particle Energies: Trends
120Sn 132Sn
5.2 5.9
- 20
- 10
50 56 64 66 70 82
ESPE (MeV) Neutron number
g9/2 d5/2 g7/2 s1/2 d3/2 h11/2
∆ (g 9
2 -g 7 2 ) filling h 11 2 between 120Sn and 132Sn
Vlowk NNSP diff. Tot
- 2.15
+0.89 +3.04 Central
- 0.034
+0.30 +0.33 Vector +0.12 +1.55 +1.43 LS
- 0.038
- 0.06
- 0.022
ALS +0.49 +1.61 +1.12 Tensor
- 2.30
- 0.96
+1.34
Summary
The physics around magic or semi-magic closures depends of subtle balances between the spherical mean field and the (very large) correlation energies of the open shell configurations at play There is a common mechanism explaining the appearance of ”islands of inversion/deformation” (IoI’s) in nuclei with large neutron excess, and shape coexistence usually shows up as a its portal The IoI’s at N=20 and N=28 merge in the Magnesium isotopes. Shape coexistence in 78Ni is the portal to a new IoI at N=50 The IoI’s at N=40 and N=50 merge in the Chromium isotopes. Increasing role of spin-orbite force in intermediate mass region
Summary
Special Thanks to:
- B. Bounthong, E. Caurier, H. Naidja, A. Zuker
- A. Poves
- H. Grawe, S. Lenzi
- J. Herzfeld