SH-82 ALIGNMENT STUDY FROM THE INTERSECTION OF SH-82 AND SH-100 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

sh 82 alignment study
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

SH-82 ALIGNMENT STUDY FROM THE INTERSECTION OF SH-82 AND SH-100 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SH-82 ALIGNMENT STUDY FROM THE INTERSECTION OF SH-82 AND SH-100 EXTENDING EAST AND NORTH TO JUST SOUTH OF SNAKE CREEK SEQUOYAH COUNTY Open House November 15, 2016 PRESENTATION OUTLINE Background Purpose and need for the project


slide-1
SLIDE 1

SH-82 ALIGNMENT STUDY

FROM THE INTERSECTION OF SH-82 AND SH-100 EXTENDING EAST AND NORTH TO JUST SOUTH OF SNAKE CREEK SEQUOYAH COUNTY

Open House November 15, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

Background

Scope

Environmental Alternatives Summary

 Background – Purpose and need for the project  Scope – Design constraints  Environmental – Environmental review process  Design Alternatives – Five alignment alternatives  Summary – Matrix, timeline and public comments

SH-82

slide-3
SLIDE 3

MEETING PURPOSE

Background

Scope

Environmental Alternatives Summary

Present and solicit input for the proposed improvements of SH- 82 from the intersection of SH- 82 and SH-100 extending east and north to just south of the Snake Creek Bridge in Sequoyah County, and to obtain public input to aid in selecting a preferred alternative.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

PROJECT BACKGROUND

Background

Scope

Environmental Alternatives Summary

 This segment of SH-82 was originally a county road and doesn’t meet current highway design criteria  Unsafe curves with poor sight distance  High accident rate

Unsafe Curves

slide-5
SLIDE 5

EXISTING ALIGNMENT

 Two, 11-foot driving lanes  Poor horizontal and vertical curves

Background

Scope

Environmental Alternatives Summary

No shoulders & Steep slopes Poor vertical curve (limited sight distance) Poor horizontal curves

slide-6
SLIDE 6

EXISTING ALIGNMENT

 Poor sight distance to see around corners  Skewed intersections with limited sight distance

Background

Scope

Environmental Alternatives Summary

Rocks preventing clear sight Unsafe intersection

slide-7
SLIDE 7

ACCIDENT DATA

(2006 TO 2016)  Over 4.5 times more accidents than the state average  Fatal collision rate is 540% higher than the state average  Three (3) fatalities

Background

Scope

Environmental Alternatives Summary

Skewed intersection at SH-82 and E 970 Road

Current traffic (2016): 1,460 vehicles/day Project 30 year traffic (2046): 2,580 vehicles/day

slide-8
SLIDE 8

ACCIDENT DATA

(2006 TO 2016)

Accident History in Relation to Unsafe Curves and intersections

 94% of the accidents occurred at poor curves or dangerous intersections

Background

Scope

Environmental Alternatives Summary

Type of Collision

Fixed Objects 56.7% Overturning 28.4% Angle Turning 4.5% Head-On 3.0% Miscellaneous 7.4%

slide-9
SLIDE 9

PROJECT SCOPE

 Improve safety beginning at the intersection of SH-82 and SH-100 extending north and east to Snake Creek Bridge.  Analyze five alternative alignments  Perform an environmental review  Incorporate the Cherokee Hills Scenic Byway Plan

Background Scope Environmental Alternatives Summary

slide-10
SLIDE 10

PROPOSED DESIGN

 Improve horizontal and vertical curves to increase safety

 Correct sight distance around curves

 The existing highway is to remain open during construction

Proposed Roadway

  • Two, 12-foot driving lanes
  • 8-foot shoulders
  • Open drainage ditches
  • 55 or 65 mph design speed

Background

Scope Environmental Alternatives Summary

slide-11
SLIDE 11

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

Environmental Review Process

Community Facilities Cultural Issues Farmland Floodplain Hazardous Waste Right-of- Way Parks Socioeconomic Stream Impacts Endangered Species Tribal Concerns Wetlands

Background Solution Environmental Alternatives Summary

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Community Facilities

 Blackgum Christian Union Church  Faith Christian Church

Economic Impacts

 Several businesses in area

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

Hazardous Waste Impacts

 Underground storage tanks

Right-of-Way

 Impact to homes and businesses

Background Solution Environmental Alternatives Summary

Threatened and Endangered Species Impacts

 11 federally listed species  Quality habitat

Wetland Impacts

 Minimal

Stream Impacts

 Several stream crossings

slide-13
SLIDE 13

ALIGNMENT ALTERNATIVES

 Considered five alignment alternatives

 Alt. 1 - Rehabilitation with curve corrections of the existing alignment to meet a 55 mph design speed.  Alt. 2 – Reconstruction with an offset alignment to the east at a 55 mph design speed.  Alt. 3 - Reconstruction with an offset alignment to the east at a 65 mph design speed.  Alt. 4 - Reconstruction with an offset alignment further east at a 65 mph design speed.  Alt. 5 - Reconstruction with an offset alignment to the west at a 65 mph design speed.

 Considered topography, right-of-way and utility impacts plus environmental constraints.

Background Solution Environmental Alternatives Summary

slide-14
SLIDE 14

ALTERNATIVE 1

Rehabilitation with curve corrections of the existing alignment to meet a 55 mph design speed.

 New alignment to correct curves while keeping traffic open  Majority of the alternative runs parallel to existing on the east side  Utilizes approximately 2,200 feet of existing highway  Does not correct vertical curve south of Snake Creek  Least environmental impact  Potential impacts to commercial property, community facility and residences  Estimated total alternative cost of $21.1 million

Alternative 1

Background Solution Environmental Alternatives Summary

slide-15
SLIDE 15

ALTERNATIVE 2

Alternative 2r

Reconstruction with an offset alignment to the east at a 55 mph design speed

 No curves north of EW-97 Road meet 65 mph  The new alignment runs east of existing  Utilizes 1,000 feet of existing highway  Corrects vertical curve south of Snake Creek where accidents are frequent  Potential impact to three residential properties  Estimated total alternative cost of $20.3 million

Background Solution Environmental Alternatives Summary

slide-16
SLIDE 16

ALTERNATIVE 3

Alternative 3

Reconstruction with an offset alignment to the east at a 65 mph design speed

 Located slightly east of Alternative 2  Potential impact to five residential properties  Estimated total alternative cost of $30.6 million

Background Solution Environmental Alternatives Summary

slide-17
SLIDE 17

ALTERNATIVE 4

Alternative 4

Reconstruction with an offset alignment further east at a 65 mph design speed

 Located furthest east of all alternatives  Mountainous terrain and a plateau with steep slopes  Most potential for environmental impacts  Most potential to impact residential properties  Estimated total alternative cost of $37.5 million

Background Solution Environmental Alternatives Summary

slide-18
SLIDE 18

ALTERNATIVE 5

Alternative 5s

Reconstruction with an offset alignment to the west at a 65 mph design speed

 Straightens the intersection at SH-100, SH-82 and NS-4515 Road  Location of several accidents  Most direct and shortest route  Potential impact to businesses  Estimated total alternative cost of $28.7 million

Background Solution Environmental Alternatives Summary

slide-19
SLIDE 19

CHEROKEE HILLS SCENIC BYWAY

The Cherokee Hills Scenic Byway was created to “tell the story of NE Oklahoma that captures the culture, traditions and beauty of the land of the Cherokee people.”  Scenic byway begins in Gore and ends in West Siloam Springs

 Located within the scenic byway

 The Byway program includes

 Possible scenic overlook  Reducing accidents in rural areas  Economic development

Scenic Turnout Opportunities

Possible Scenic Overlook

Background Solution Environmental Alternatives Summary

slide-20
SLIDE 20

PROJECT SUMMARY MATRIX

Background Solution Scenic Byway Environmental Summary

Project Summary Matrix

Category Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Alternative 4 Alternative 5

Project Overview Design Speed (miles per hour)(mph) 55 55 65 65 65 Length of Alignment (miles) 2.56 2.68 2.63 3.10 2.12 Relocated Utilities 3 3 3 3 3 Community Facilities Impacts 1 possible 1 possible 1 possible 1 possible Residential/Economic/Business Impacts 55 59 62 68 41 Project Costs Construction Costs $ 20,461,000 $ 19,667,000 $ 29,896,000 $ 36,983,000 $ 28,321,000 Right-of-Way Costs $ 547,000 $ 499,000 $ 592,000 $ 337,000 $ 358,000 Utility Relocation Costs $ 134,000 $ 128,000 $ 99,000 $ 130,000 $ 23,000 Total Alternative Costs $ 21,142,000 $ 20,294,000 $ 30,587,000 $ 37,450,000 $ 28,702,000

slide-21
SLIDE 21

NEXT STEP

Background Solution Scenic Byway Environmental Summary

 Review and analyze public comments received

 Incorporate substantial comments into the design  Conduct further public outreach after the alternative has been selected

 Select an alignment alternative  Conduct NEPA field studies and prepare environmental document  Prepare design plans  Right-of-Way and Utility Relocation

 Programmed to start in: Federal Fiscal Year 2020

 Construction

 Programmed to start in: Federal Fiscal Year 2022

slide-22
SLIDE 22

THANK YOU!

 Leave your comment form here tonight  Mail the comment form to ODOT

Oklahoma Department of Transportation Environmental Programs Division 200 NE 21st Street Oklahoma City, OK 73105

 Fax your comments to (405) 522-5193  Email your comments to odot-environment@odot.org  Submit online at www.ODOT.org/PublicMeetings

Please submit your comments by: November 29, 2016