Session 4: Producing disaster statistics from a gender perspective - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

session 4 producing disaster statistics from a gender
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Session 4: Producing disaster statistics from a gender perspective - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Global Forum on Gender Statistics 14 16 November 2018, Tokyo Session 4: Producing disaster statistics from a gender perspective Sharita Serrao (prepared with inputs from Daniel Clarke) Statistics Division


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Statistics Division

http://www.unescap.org/our-work/statistics

Global Forum on Gender Statistics 14 – 16 November 2018, Tokyo

Session 4: Producing disaster statistics from a gender perspective

Sharita Serrao (prepared with inputs from Daniel Clarke)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Statistics Division

http://www.unescap.org/our-work/statistics

Disaster‐Related Statistics Framework (DRSF): A new statistical guideline

  • Endorsed by 6th Session of ESCAP Committee on Statistics

(October, 2018)

  • Developed by Expert Group of NSOs, Disaster-management

agencies, and international organizations in Asia-Pacific

  • Methodological foundation for technical

assistance/international cooperation; aligned with: – Sendai Framework for DRR 2015-2030 and related indicators/terminologies for monitoring implementation; – Disaster-related targets of the 2030 Agenda

  • Translates agreed concepts and definitions into specific

instructions and technical recommendations for production and dissemination of disaster-related statistics

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Statistics Division

http://www.unescap.org/our-work/statistics

Cycle of disaster‐risk information

Disaster

Impacts Assessments Risk Assessments

… after response and recovery… … informs… … increase preparedness, prevent and mitigate the next…

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Statistics Division

http://www.unescap.org/our-work/statistics

Measuring risk: a critical component of disaster statistics

Risk = f (Hazard exposure, Vulnerability, Capacity)

Hazard exposure:

  • Location
  • Probabilistic map of

hazard

  • Complementary maps:

population, critical infrastructure, ecosystems, crop areas, land use etc.

Vulnerability:

  • Extension of initial

exposure statistics

  • Disaggregation of

population, infrastructure or lands exposed to a hazard etc.

Coping capacity:

  • Ability of

individuals/households/ businesses/ infrastructure to recover without sustaining major/ permanent negative impacts

  • Ex. household

preparedness, GDP per capita (proxy)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Statistics Division

http://www.unescap.org/our-work/statistics

Gender is a cross cutting element of the Disaster‐Related Statistics Framework (DRSF)

Disaster-related Statistics Framework (p.22) Hazards resulting in sudden disasters and slow processes resulting in disasters

(During) and after a disaster

Exposure Vulnerability Coping capacity Direct impacts to environment and cultural heritage

(loss of critical ecosystems, water resources, cultural heritage zones or objects…)

Direct human impacts

(deaths/missing, injured/ill, displaced/evacuated, damages to dwellings, loss of jobs…)

Direct material impacts and economic loss

(on fixed assets/valuables, critical goods and services, critical infrastructure…)

Indirect impacts

(decline in economic value added as a consequence of direct economic loss and/or human and environment impacts)

Disaster Risk Reduction Activity

Emergency

3 core elements of disaster‐risk measurement

Before

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Statistics Division

http://www.unescap.org/our-work/statistics

Gender in the DRSF (1)

Gender issues e.g. Data needs/indicators e.g. Potential sources Exposure Women/men exposure to hazards Basic disaggregation (sex, age, location, disability status…)

  • Population census

Vulnerability Socio-economic factors affecting vulnerability: age, disability status, income status…. access to resources, decision-making role, access to info, life skills, dependence on natural resources, exposure to VAW  can increase women’s vulnerability

  • Extension of initial

exposure statistics with nested disaggregation

  • Gender indicators:

Proportion of women with a bank account; Proportion of women with access to credit; Proportion of women subjected to violence etc.

  • Household surveys
  • Admin data (CRVS,

education, health..) Coping capacity Factors influencing resilience e.g. if most decisions related to disaster preparedness and recovery made by men  might omit important aspects of women’s lives, needs and concerns Ex: percentage of women involved in disaster-risk reduction activities/decision- making/public governance

  • Household surveys
  • Admin data (disaster

management agency data , CRVS, education, health..)

Before

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Statistics Division

http://www.unescap.org/our-work/statistics

Gender in the DRSF (2)

Gender issues e.g. Data needs/indicators e.g. Potential sources Direct impacts to the environment

Impacts of disaster on ecosystems, lands, natural resources, etc. on which women might rely more heavily than men Ex: hectares of forest tree cover, agriculture plantations, pastures and natural grassland affected by a certain type of disaster 

  • wned/used by women & men
  • Admin data (of

disaster management agency)

Direct human impacts

Impact of disaster on women in terms of livelihood, health, survival, etc. Ex: Number of women/men deaths/injured/missing/ill; Number of women who lost their jobs/occupation; Number of women/men evacuated/displaced

Direct material impacts and economic losses

Impact of disaster on assets (small agri plots, small animals etc.) or resources (water source, fuel) on which women might rely more heavily than men Ex: square km of agricultural land affected; number of critical water supply infrastructures destroyed

Indirect impacts

Broader economic impact (women’s disproportionate poverty/limited education + impact of disaster  double burden) Macro indicators: Net impact on GDP

  • Modelled estimation

from economic statistics

After

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Statistics Division

http://www.unescap.org/our-work/statistics

Risk is complex, need a simple measurement framework…

The risk measurement model:

  • Provides framework to organize, analyse and make better use of

disaggregated data.

  • Scalable/flexible: individual to household to community.
  • Applicable to risks beyond disasters, climate change and environment (e.g.

health, VAW…).

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Statistics Division

http://www.unescap.org/our-work/statistics

Thank You