Section 36: Spine Biomechanics 36-1 From: Peeler 36-2 From: - - PDF document

section 36 spine biomechanics
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Section 36: Spine Biomechanics 36-1 From: Peeler 36-2 From: - - PDF document

Section 36: Spine Biomechanics 36-1 From: Peeler 36-2 From: Iatridis 36-3 Theory of weight bearing Theory of weight bearing Nucleus pulpous imbibes water Nucleus pulpous imbibes water Develops internal pressure Pressure exerted


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Section 36: Spine Biomechanics

36-1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

36-2 From: Peeler

slide-3
SLIDE 3

36-3 From: Iatridis

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Theory of weight bearing Theory of weight bearing

  • Nucleus pulpous imbibes water

Nucleus pulpous imbibes water

  • Develops internal pressure
  • Pressure exerted in all directions
  • Pressure exerted in all directions

– Lateral forces

  • Against annulus

Against annulus

– Superiorly and inferiorly directed forces

  • Against end plates

g

– Increases stiffness

  • Of end plate and annulus fibrosus

36-4 From: Ziv

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Nucleus Pulposus

  • Nucleus Pulposus

– Eccentrically positioned posteriorly – Young & healthy – Young & healthy

  • 50% cross-sectional
  • 90% water, bound to proteoglycans

– Aging> dessication> increase viscosity> fissuring – Pascal’s law

  • Fluid mass within closed container> local increase in
  • Fluid mass within closed container> local increase in

pressure> transmit around entire side wall (annulus)

  • Young nucleus> even distribution of load

Old l d t ti t b l b d d

  • Old nucleus> undue concentration on vertebral body edges

– Small displacement w/ ROM, ball-bearing like – Compressive stress predominates

36-5 From: Yang

Compressive stress predominates

slide-6
SLIDE 6

36-6 From: Iatridis

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Theory of weight bearing (cont’d) Theory of weight bearing (cont d)

36-7 From: Ziv

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • Intradiscal Pressure

– Compressive loads in vivo: 500N standing, 700N sitting – Increased to 3000 to 6000N during lifting of moderate weights decreases with load closer moderate weights, decreases with load closer to body – Estimate of P = 1 5X compressive load Estimate of P 1.5X compressive load divided by the cross sectional area – Disk pressure is usually uniform – Pressure lowest in supine position – Disk usually does not fail, but end plates f

36-8 From: Yang

fracture

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Measurements of In vivo Loads Measurements of In vivo Loads

  • Needle pressure

Needle pressure transducer

  • Calibrated

– Introduced into nucleus pulpous of d i f ti l cadaveric functional unit

  • Inserted in vivo in L3-
  • Inserted in vivo in L3-

4 disc

36-9 From: Ziv

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Shear & Tensile Characteristics Shear & Tensile Characteristics

  • In direct shear tests

In direct shear tests

– Shear stiffness in horizontal direction

  • 260 N/mm2
  • Spine rarely fails in pure shear
  • Similarly under normal physiologic activities

– Pure tensile loading doesn’t occur – But annulus undergoes tensile loading during

  • Bending
  • Axial rotation
  • Extension

36-10 From: Ziv

slide-11
SLIDE 11

36-11 From: Yang

slide-12
SLIDE 12

36-12 From: Peeler

slide-13
SLIDE 13

36-13 From: Peeler

slide-14
SLIDE 14

36-14 From: Peeler

slide-15
SLIDE 15

36-15 From: Peeler

slide-16
SLIDE 16

36-16 From: Peeler

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Low Back Pain Low Back Pain

  • Most frequent cause of activity limitation in people under

q y p p age 45

  • Direct annual cost of treating low back pain patients

– $11 4 billion in 1994 $11.4 billion in 1994 – Not including the secondary costs of lost work and activity

  • Mechanical loading conditions associated with back pain

F t b di d t i ti – Frequent bending and twisting – Heavy physical work – Sedentary environment Vib ti – Vibration

36-17 From: Iatridis

slide-18
SLIDE 18

36-18 From: Peeler