Scientific Literature (@ TUM)
Benedikt Hauptmann, Henning Femmer
With material from
- Dr. Florian Deißenböck, and
- Prof. Dr. Stefan Wagner
Scientific Literature (@ TUM) Benedikt Hauptmann, Henning Femmer - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Scientific Literature (@ TUM) Benedikt Hauptmann, Henning Femmer With material from Dr. Florian Deienbck , and Prof. Dr. Stefan Wagner Goals and Content 1. Methodology: Searching for literature in a scientific field 2. Evaluation:
With material from
Two parts:
Goals of literature reviews:
with other work (and explain why)
− Exploratory − Solution − Experience − Validation / Evaluation − Philosophical / Opinion
[Wieringa2005] R. Wieringa, N. Maiden, N. Mead, and C. Rolland, “Requirements engineering paper classification and evaluation criteria: a proposal and a discussion”, Req. Eng., 2005.
Jackpot: Meta publications / Research Surveys
− Usually single-author − 100 – 1000 pages
− 20 – 50 pages
− 10 – 30 pages
− 3 – 15 pages
− 3 – 15 pages
Submitted Under Review Rejected Accepted Reviewed Program committee hands out paper to (2-4) reviewers (experts from the field) Paper Ready author submits to conference/workshop reviewers submit evaluation ("reviews") Program committee decides based on reviews Published author includes final changes and presents at workshop/conference
Submitted Under Review Rejected Accepted with minor changes Reviewed Paper Ready Published Accepted Major revision starke Überarbeitung, "Rebuttal"
The peer review system
− Mostly single author, no peer review
− Peer review (several round trips)
− Peer review (several round trips)
− Peer review
− Peer review
− No peer review
− ?
− No peer review
Journals
Conferences (Proceedings)
*in no particular order
Publishers:
Direct sources
Meta sources
We use mostly Google Scholar!
− All results in one place − Direct meta-information (citations) − Sometimes direct link to PDF − Author graphs
− No quality filter − Few search filter options
1. Manually searching for keywords 2. Searching through author’s pages 3. (Literature-) Snowballing 4. Systematic strategies − Systematic Mapping Studies − Systematic Literature Reviews
How do you get access?
Details can be found here: https://www.lrz.de/services/netzdienste/proxy/journals-access/
− Classical, useful format for LaTeX − Most sources offer information in bibtex format − Use proper types: @article,…
− Classical, useful format for LaTeX − Most sources offer information in bibtex format − Use proper types: @article,…
− Plattform independant − Uses BibTeX as data format − Link to pdf − Group
− Modern, “in the cloud” − Cooperative references − Notes, highlighting, etc − Bibtex export
Two parts:
Reviews in Software Engineering,” 2007.
http://blizzard.cs.uwaterloo.ca/keshav/home/Papers/data/07/paper-reading.pdf
http://plg.uwaterloo.ca/~migod/research/beckOOPSLA.html
Research” and the corresponding presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NM3ClIbuVoM
https://www.lrz.de/services/netzdienste/proxy/zeitschriftenzugang/
http://www.mendeley.com http://jabref.sourceforge.net …