SCIENCE IN AN OPERATIONAL SETTING Philippa Gander Sleep/Wake - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

science in an operational setting
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

SCIENCE IN AN OPERATIONAL SETTING Philippa Gander Sleep/Wake - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SCIENCE IN AN OPERATIONAL SETTING Philippa Gander Sleep/Wake Research Centre, Massey University Jim Mangie Delta Air Lines SLEEP/WAKE Research Centre MOE TIKA/MOE PAI Outline What to measure When to measure Interpreting the data


slide-1
SLIDE 1

SLEEP/WAKE Research Centre MOE TIKA/MOE PAI

Philippa Gander Sleep/Wake Research Centre, Massey University Jim Mangie Delta Air Lines

SCIENCE IN AN OPERATIONAL SETTING

slide-2
SLIDE 2

SLEEP/WAKE Research Centre MOE TIKA/MOE PAI

Outline

  • What to measure
  • When to measure
  • Interpreting the data
  • Safety Performance Indicators
  • Conclusions
slide-3
SLIDE 3

SLEEP/WAKE Research Centre MOE TIKA/MOE PAI

What to Measure: Crew Fatigue

ICAO definition of fatigue:

A physiological state of reduced mental or physical performance capability resulting from sleep loss or extended wakefulness, circadian phase, or workload (mental and/or physical activity) that can impair a crew member’s alertness and ability to safely operate an aircraft or perform safety related duties.

  • Functional status (subjective ,objective)
  • Sleep history
  • Circadian phase
  • Workload
slide-4
SLIDE 4

SLEEP/WAKE Research Centre MOE TIKA/MOE PAI

Sleep: Actigraphy and Diaries

slide-5
SLIDE 5

SLEEP/WAKE Research Centre MOE TIKA/MOE PAI

When to Measure Crew Fatigue

  • Monitoring for FRM Processes
  • In response to a series of fatigue reports
  • to identify extent and severity of hazard
  • In response to an incident
  • SPIs to evaluate effectiveness of fatigue mitigations and

controls

  • Validation of a new route
  • Monitoring for FRMS Assurance Processes
  • SPIs set in FRMS Policy objectives
  • SPIs for regulatory audit

Crew fatigue measures may not always be needed

slide-6
SLIDE 6

SLEEP/WAKE Research Centre MOE TIKA/MOE PAI

Safety Performance Indicators (SPIs)

5 FRMS Components

Fatigue Safety Action Group

  • 3. Risk Management

Processes

  • 1. Policy

4.Safety Assurance Processes

  • 5. Promotion

Processes

  • 2. Documentation

SMS

slide-7
SLIDE 7

SLEEP/WAKE Research Centre MOE TIKA/MOE PAI

Comparing fatigue on ULR and LR flights

Safety Performance Indicators: Example

slide-8
SLIDE 8

SLEEP/WAKE Research Centre MOE TIKA/MOE PAI

2 4 6 8 10 12 Median sleep (hrs) 24 hrs prior to duty Landing Relief

Fatigue Status at Start of Duty

SPI – sleep in the last 24 hrs

slide-9
SLIDE 9

SLEEP/WAKE Research Centre MOE TIKA/MOE PAI

2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 mean PVT reaction speed Landing Relief

Fatigue Status at Start of Duty

SPI – mean PVT reaction speed early in flight

slide-10
SLIDE 10

SLEEP/WAKE Research Centre MOE TIKA/MOE PAI

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 Median sleep in flight (hrs) Landing Relief

Fatigue Status at Top of Descent

SPI – median total in-flight sleep

slide-11
SLIDE 11

SLEEP/WAKE Research Centre MOE TIKA/MOE PAI

2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 mean PVT reaction speed Landing Relief

Fatigue Status at Top of Descent

SPI – mean PVT reaction speed late in flight

slide-12
SLIDE 12

SLEEP/WAKE Research Centre MOE TIKA/MOE PAI

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 % crewmembers Landing Relief

Fatigue Status at Top of Descent

SPI – % crew with KSS ≥ 7

slide-13
SLIDE 13

SLEEP/WAKE Research Centre MOE TIKA/MOE PAI

Operational SPIs: Examples

  • Track data on number of :
  • exceedances of planned crew duty day (e.g. > 14 hrs)
  • flight duty periods ending > 30 mins later than scheduled
  • flight duty periods starting / ending within window of

circadian low (WOCL)

  • reserve crew call-outs (on particular flights, at a particular

crew base, etc) Monitoring of FRM processes Monitoring of FRMS safety assurance processes

slide-14
SLIDE 14

SLEEP/WAKE Research Centre MOE TIKA/MOE PAI

Conclusions

  • Challenge
  • Developing in-house expertise versus using consultants ($$)
  • Data sharing
  • Operators don’t have to reinvent the wheel
  • Rich data source for improving fatigue science
  • Needs
  • Paradigms for data sharing
  • Better indicators of fatigue-related performance impairment
  • Better fatigue measurement technologies
  • Better fatigue risk assessment (safety consequences of

being fatigued in a given context)

  • Better fatigue risk controls and mitigations

Cooperation is the key

slide-15
SLIDE 15

SLEEP/WAKE Research Centre MOE TIKA/MOE PAI

Acknowledgements

  • Dr Jarnail Singh, CAA of Singapore
  • Participants in B-777 study
  • Delta data collection team
  • Scientific Steering Committee, FAA 3-airline

study

  • Margo van den Berg, Dr Leigh Signal, Dr

Sarah Jay, Sleep/Wake Research Centre