SCE Map Update: Performance Studies Michael Mooney, Hannah Rogers - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

sce map update performance studies
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

SCE Map Update: Performance Studies Michael Mooney, Hannah Rogers - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SCE Map Update: Performance Studies Michael Mooney, Hannah Rogers Colorado State University ProtoDUNE Sim/Reco Meeting May 8 th , 2019 1 Introduction Introduction Previously presented data-driven SCE maps Focus for today: data-driven


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

SCE Map Update: Performance Studies

Michael Mooney, Hannah Rogers

Colorado State University

ProtoDUNE Sim/Reco Meeting May 8th, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Introduction Introduction

♦ Previously presented data-driven SCE maps ♦ Focus for today: data-driven metrics showing performance

  • f calibration, using cathode-crossing tracks
  • Track point residuals

– Distance of straight-line fit to track point, both before and after spatial corrections

  • dQ/dx distribution

– Spatial correction impact (via spatial squeezing/stretching) – E field correction impact (via recombination) – Full impact (spatial and E field corrections)

♦ Also look at varying the center in Y/Z plane of charge distribution in maps – how is performance impacted?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Track Point Residuals Track Point Residuals

♦ Tracks become straighter after correction – not surprising ♦ Should compare to MC w/o SCE to better understand how much MCS complicates metric

DATA Run 5841 30000 Tracks DATA Run 5759 30000 Tracks

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

dQ/dx Distributions dQ/dx Distributions

DATA Run 5841 30000 Tracks DATA Run 5759 30000 Tracks

♦ dQ/dx distribution becomes more narrow after corrections ♦ Mean of distribution shifts to lower dQ/dx ♦ Feature at dQ/dx ~ 0 due to track being nearly orthogonal to anode plane (mostly removed via cut of dx < 2.0)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

dQ/dx vs. X dQ/dx vs. X

DATA Run 5841 30000 Tracks DATA Run 5759 30000 Tracks

♦ dQ/dx vs. X shows different trend for different runs

  • Run 5759: post-correction electron lifetime ~ 12 ms
  • Run 5841: post-correction electron lifetime very, very high

♦ Either residual SCE after this preliminary correction or purity monitors underpredicting electron lifetime

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Modifying Y/Z Charge Center Modifying Y/Z Charge Center

♦ Allow for Y/Z position of “center of charge” in distortion map calculation to vary within ±60 cm in both directions ♦ Small adjustment made: Y center same, Z center shifted by +30 cm – but very, very little difference

DATA Run 5841 30000 Tracks Optimized DATA Run 5841 30000 Tracks Before

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Summary Summary

♦ Data-driven metrics studied – SCE calibration is improving things! ♦ Trends in dQ/dx vs. X still being understood ♦ Infrastructure in LArSoft also working – see Hannah’s talk ♦ Data-driven SCE maps ready for next production (both simulation and reconstruction/calibration)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

BACKUP SLIDES

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Backward Displacement Maps Backward Displacement Maps

MC (No Flow) Data

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

E Field Maps E Field Maps

MC (No Flow) Data