Scattering: introduction Thus far we concentrated on energy loss - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

scattering introduction
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Scattering: introduction Thus far we concentrated on energy loss - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Scattering: introduction Thus far we concentrated on energy loss We now wish to quantify scattering, i.e. momentum transfer P. Piot, PHYS 571 Fall 2007 Differential cross-section I Let N be the number of particles scattered


slide-1
SLIDE 1
  • P. Piot, PHYS 571 – Fall 2007

Scattering: introduction

  • Thus far we concentrated on energy loss
  • We now wish to quantify scattering, i.e. momentum transfer
slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • P. Piot, PHYS 571 – Fall 2007

Differential cross-section I

  • Let N’ be the number of particles scattered from bdbdφ into the

solid angle dΩ per unit of time.

  • Then
  • Where

is the differential cross-section

) (cosθ d bdb =

Ω ≡ Ω d bdbd d d ϕ σ

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • P. Piot, PHYS 571 – Fall 2007

Differential cross-section II

  • Under the small-angle approximation we have:
  • Then
  • For e- we saw that
  • So
  • This is a small-angle approximation of the Rutherford differential cross

section

Ω = d dσ

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • P. Piot, PHYS 571 – Fall 2007
  • For electrons targets:
  • For nuclei targets
  • Therefore scattering by nuclei is Z2 more probable that

scattering by electron target.

  • But there are Z times more nuclei than e- ⇒ scattering by

nuclei is Z times more probable that by e-

  • So scattering in a block of matter is dominated by nuclei (while

energy loss is dominated by the electrons)

Differential cross-section III

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • P. Piot, PHYS 571 – Fall 2007

Remarks on Rutherford Cross section

  • The Rutherford cross section is actually:
  • Which we could have inferred from a detailed analysis of the

scattering geometry, wherein the impact parameter is actually related to the angle via

  • While we only had a 1/θ dependence
  • This is an historical conincidence that the Rutherford cross section

which was derived in the framework of classical mechanics keep the same form in Quantum mechanics (when spin effects are introduced).

) 2 / ( sin 1 4

4 2 2 2 1

θ σ         ≡ Ω E e Z Z d d

) 2 / tan( 1 2

2 2 1

θ E e Z Z b =

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • P. Piot, PHYS 571 – Fall 2007

rms scattering angle I

  • When we have an incoming cloud of particle, e.g. a charged

particle beam, how do we quantify the scattering?

  • Use statistical concept: the variance: if a variable x is

distributed with a probability function F(x) then the variance of the function which is an indication of the spread of the variable x is

  • Correspondingly the rms value is defined as

2 / 1 2

x

x ≡

σ

∫ ∫ ∫

− ≡ dx x F xdx x F dx x x F x

F

) ( ) ( ) (

2 2

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • P. Piot, PHYS 571 – Fall 2007
  • Evaluating the integral for the dσ/dΩ we have
  • Thus for single event scattering
  • Where we can estimate

rms scattering angle II

a: atomic radius

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • P. Piot, PHYS 571 – Fall 2007
  • The charge q performs a random walk through the

material and the rms deflection angle is given by

  • So that
  • And from central-limit theorem we infer the

probability distribution to be

Case of many small angle scattering

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • P. Piot, PHYS 571 – Fall 2007
  • Consider the single scattering event cross-section:
  • Introducing the projected angle
  • Upon integration over φ we get

Case of single scattering events

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • P. Piot, PHYS 571 – Fall 2007

Scattering probability

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • P. Piot, PHYS 571 – Fall 2007

Summary (extract from the PDG)

http://pdg.lbl.gov/