scalar dm with t channel fermionic colored mediator
play

Scalar DM with t-channel fermionic colored mediator Laura Lopez - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Scalar DM with t-channel fermionic colored mediator Laura Lopez Honorez in collaboration with F. Giacchino, A. Ibarra, M. Tytgat & S. Wild to be published soon... TeVPa 2015 - Kashiwa - Japan Laura Lopez Honorez (TENA-VUB) Scalar DM &


  1. Scalar DM with t-channel fermionic colored mediator Laura Lopez Honorez in collaboration with F. Giacchino, A. Ibarra, M. Tytgat & S. Wild to be published soon... TeVPa 2015 - Kashiwa - Japan Laura Lopez Honorez (TENA-VUB) Scalar DM & colored mediator October 26, 2015 1 / 12

  2. Introduction t-channel mediator : the well known case of Majorana DM [Bergstrom’89, Flores et al’89 and also Bringmann ’08+, Ciafaloni ’11, Garny ’11+ ] σ v = a + bv 2 a term :s-wave chirally suppressed ∝ ( m f / m χ ) 2 b terms :p-wave v suppression � v 2 � fo ∼ 0 . 2 while � v 2 � GC ∼ 10 − 6 hopeless for indirect detection when m f / m χ ≪ 1 ? ? Laura Lopez Honorez (TENA-VUB) Scalar DM & colored mediator October 26, 2015 2 / 12

  3. Introduction t-channel mediator : the well known case of Majorana DM [Bergstrom’89, Flores et al’89 and also Bringmann ’08+, Ciafaloni ’11, Garny ’11+ ] σ v = a + bv 2 a term :s-wave chirally suppressed ∝ ( m f / m χ ) 2 b terms :p-wave v suppression � v 2 � fo ∼ 0 . 2 while � v 2 � GC ∼ 10 − 6 hopeless for indirect detection when m f / m χ ≪ 1 ? ? Not hopeless ! Can get significant signal from χχ → V ¯ ff ! ! The emmission of an extra vector V lifts the chiral suppression ... but suppressed by 3bdy & extra coupling Laura Lopez Honorez (TENA-VUB) Scalar DM & colored mediator October 26, 2015 2 / 12

  4. Introduction t-channel mediator : why looking at real Scalar DM ? [Bergstrom ’89+, Bringmann ’08+, Ciafaloni ’11, Garny ’11+,Toma ’13, Giacchino’13,... ] DM = Majorana χ L ⊃ y φ † χ f R + h . c . Z 2 : χ → − χ, Φ → − Φ r = M φ M χ σ v ff | χ = g 4 v 2 1 + r 4 l 48 π M 2 ( 1 + r 2 ) 4 χ p -wave suppressed ( ∝ v 2 for m f → 0) Laura Lopez Honorez (TENA-VUB) Scalar DM & colored mediator October 26, 2015 3 / 12

  5. Introduction t-channel mediator : why looking at real Scalar DM ? [Bergstrom ’89+, Bringmann ’08+, Ciafaloni ’11, Garny ’11+,Toma ’13, Giacchino’13,... ] DM = Majorana χ DM = Real Scalar S L ⊃ y S ¯ L ⊃ y φ † χ f R + h . c . ψ f R + h . c . . Z 2 : S → − S , Ψ → − Ψ Z 2 : χ → − χ, Φ → − Φ r = M φ M χ σ v ff | χ = g 4 v 2 1 + r 4 l 48 π M 2 ( 1 + r 2 ) 4 χ p -wave suppressed ( ∝ v 2 for m f → 0) Laura Lopez Honorez (TENA-VUB) Scalar DM & colored mediator October 26, 2015 3 / 12

  6. Introduction t-channel mediator : why looking at real Scalar DM ? [Bergstrom ’89+, Bringmann ’08+, Ciafaloni ’11, Garny ’11+,Toma ’13, Giacchino’13,... ] DM = Majorana χ DM = Real Scalar S L ⊃ y S ¯ L ⊃ y φ † χ f R + h . c . ψ f R + h . c . . Z 2 : S → − S , Ψ → − Ψ Z 2 : χ → − χ, Φ → − Φ r = M φ r = M ψ M χ M S σ v ff | χ = g 4 v 2 1 + r 4 σ v ff | S = y 4 v 4 1 l l 48 π M 2 ( 1 + r 2 ) 4 60 π M 2 ( 1 + r 2 ) 4 χ S p -wave suppressed ( ∝ v 2 for m f → 0) d -wave suppressed ( ∝ v 4 for m f → 0) Laura Lopez Honorez (TENA-VUB) Scalar DM & colored mediator October 26, 2015 3 / 12

  7. Introduction t-channel mediator : why looking at real Scalar DM ? [Bergstrom ’89+, Bringmann ’08+, Ciafaloni ’11, Garny ’11+,Toma ’13, Giacchino’13,... ] DM = Majorana χ DM = Real Scalar S L ⊃ y S ¯ L ⊃ y φ † χ f R + h . c . ψ f R + h . c . . Z 2 : S → − S , Ψ → − Ψ Z 2 : χ → − χ, Φ → − Φ r = M φ r = M ψ M χ M S σ v ff | χ = g 4 v 2 1 + r 4 σ v ff | S = y 4 v 4 1 l l 48 π M 2 ( 1 + r 2 ) 4 60 π M 2 ( 1 + r 2 ) 4 χ S p -wave suppressed ( ∝ v 2 for m f → 0) d -wave suppressed ( ∝ v 4 for m f → 0) < 0 . 16 � larger Yukawas for S to match Ω dm At f.o. � σ v � ¯ ff | S / � σ v � ¯ ff | χ ∼ In addition, in general, higher order effects are more importants in the scalar case, ie σ v χ ff and σ v χ ff < σ v S VV < σ v S VV , for M dm , y fixed & V = γ, g V ¯ V ¯ [Toma ’13, Giacchino’13 & ’14, Ibarra’14] Laura Lopez Honorez (TENA-VUB) Scalar DM & colored mediator October 26, 2015 3 / 12

  8. Introduction Viable param. space for coupling to light quarks L ⊃ yS ¯ ψ q R + h . c . ψ ≡ colored fermion mediator � opportunities for LHC searches Laura Lopez Honorez (TENA-VUB) Scalar DM & colored mediator October 26, 2015 4 / 12

  9. Introduction Viable param. space for coupling to light quarks L ⊃ yS ¯ ψ q R + h . c . ψ ≡ colored fermion mediator � opportunities for LHC searches Ω h 2 through freeze-out (f.o.) : σ v VV & σ v V ¯ qq included and σ gg and σ g ¯ qq important at f.o. (away from coann.) Sommerfeld corrections for mediator annihilation included � up to max 15% enhancement / supression of Ω h 2 Laura Lopez Honorez (TENA-VUB) Scalar DM & colored mediator October 26, 2015 4 / 12

  10. Introduction Viable param. space for coupling to light quarks L ⊃ yS ¯ ψ q R + h . c . ψ ≡ colored fermion mediator � opportunities for LHC searches Ω h 2 through freeze-out (f.o.) : σ v VV & σ v V ¯ qq included and σ gg and σ g ¯ qq important at f.o. (away from coann.) Sommerfeld corrections for mediator annihilation included � up to max 15% enhancement / supression of Ω h 2 Laura Lopez Honorez (TENA-VUB) Scalar DM & colored mediator October 26, 2015 4 / 12

  11. Introduction Direct Detection searches effective DM coupling to q (scalar and twist-2 [Drees’93] ) and g [Hisano’15] included Laura Lopez Honorez (TENA-VUB) Scalar DM & colored mediator October 26, 2015 5 / 12

  12. Introduction Direct Detection searches f n /f p ❢♦r ❞❛r❦ ♠❛tt❡r ❝♦✉♣❧✐♥❣ t♦ u R effective DM coupling to q ✹ (scalar and twist-2 [Drees’93] ) and g [Hisano’15] included ✸ effective DM coupling to nucleons f p � = f n � max. ✷ isospin violation at r = 2.6, f n /f p ✶ (3.3) for q = u ,( d ) f n /f p ❢♦r ❝♦✉♣❧✐♥❣ t♦ u R f n /f p = 0 ✵ f n /f p = − 0 . 7 ✲✶ ✲✷ 10 − 2 10 − 1 ✶ ✶✵ ✺✵ r − 1 i ∈ isotopes ξ i ( Z +( A i − Z ) f n / f p ) 2 � σ eff p = σ p · i ∈ isotopes ξ i A 2 � i Laura Lopez Honorez (TENA-VUB) Scalar DM & colored mediator October 26, 2015 5 / 12

  13. Introduction Direct Detection searches effective DM coupling to q (scalar and twist-2 [Drees’93] ) and g [Hisano’15] included effective DM coupling to nucleons f p � = f n � max. isospin violation at r = 2.6, (3.3) for q = u ,( d ) LUX probes m S � 200 − 300 GeV + an island around m S ∼ 2 TeV At all masses, viable i ∈ isotopes ξ i ( Z +( A i − Z ) f n / f p ) 2 parameter space out of reach � σ eff p = σ p · � i ∈ isotopes ξ i A 2 Direct DM searches. i Laura Lopez Honorez (TENA-VUB) Scalar DM & colored mediator October 26, 2015 5 / 12

  14. Introduction Projection of direct-detection constraints Coupling to u R 10 − 1 1 m ψ m S y thermal > 6 LUX 0 . 1 XENON-1T no thermal relic 0 . 01 5 10 10 2 10 3 10 4 m S [GeV] Laura Lopez Honorez (TENA-VUB) Scalar DM & colored mediator October 26, 2015 6 / 12

  15. t❤❡r♠❛❧ ●❡❱ ✭t♦t❛❧✮ t❤❡r♠❛❧ ❡①❝❧✉❞❡❞ ❜② ❬♣❜❪ ❆❚▲❆❙ ✲❥❡t✰ ♦♥❧② ◗❈❉ ❉▼ Introduction Collider constraints Production of colored mediator at the LHC � n -jets+MET ( n > 2) at r small : n > 2 enhance visibility for too soft ψ → uS jets at r large : n > 2 S/Bgd can be larger for n > 2 Laura Lopez Honorez (TENA-VUB) Scalar DM & colored mediator October 26, 2015 7 / 12

  16. Introduction Collider constraints Production of colored mediator at the LHC � n -jets+MET ( n > 2) at r small : n > 2 enhance visibility for too soft ψ → uS jets at r large : n > 2 S/Bgd can be larger for n > 2 y t❤❡r♠❛❧ 0 . 1 1 2 4 6 10 3 m ψ = 500 ●❡❱ uu σ ✭t♦t❛❧✮ 10 2 t❤❡r♠❛❧ 10 ❡①❝❧✉❞❡❞ ❜② u ¯ u σ ❬♣❜❪ ❆❚▲❆❙ n ✲❥❡t✰ / E T 1 σ ♦♥❧② ◗❈❉ gg 10 − 1 d ¯ d 10 − 2 10 − 2 10 − 1 1 10 10 2 m ψ /m ❉▼ − 1 � Enhanced production σ including y = y thermal Laura Lopez Honorez (TENA-VUB) Scalar DM & colored mediator October 26, 2015 7 / 12

  17. Introduction Constraints derived from ATLAS multijet analysis Coupling to u R We use : ATLAS-CONF-2013-047 for 10 2-6 jets +MET at √ s = 8 TeV L = 20 . 3 fb − 1 − 1 � limits on the number of 1 m ψ m S ATLAS signal events S y thermal > 6 LUX We recompute σ excl ( r , m DM ) 0 . 1 XENON-1T evaluating efficiencies no thermal relic ǫ = N cut / N events using 0 . 01 5 10 10 2 10 3 10 4 Madgraph & CheckMATE m S [GeV] We get σ ( r , m DM , y thermal ) (tree-level) using calchep and compare to σ excl ( r , m DM ) � Can exclude DM models up to ∼ 1 TeV for the large r − y thermal region Laura Lopez Honorez (TENA-VUB) Scalar DM & colored mediator October 26, 2015 8 / 12

  18. Introduction Indirect detection constraints σ gg + σ g ¯ qq ≡ 95 − 100 % σ v tot today � γ & ¯ p constraints rough estimation of Fermi dSphs bound on σ gg & σ g ¯ qq using integrated specra for E γ = [ 0 . 5 , 500 ] GeV Typically probe the r > 1 . 2 & m S < 150 GeV � complement direct detection and collider searches at low DM mass Laura Lopez Honorez (TENA-VUB) Scalar DM & colored mediator October 26, 2015 9 / 12

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend