Save More Tomorrow: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

save more tomorrow using behavioral economics to increase
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Save More Tomorrow: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Save More Tomorrow: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving by Richard H. Thaler and Shlomo Benartzi (2004) Lukas Vorwerk | Experimental and Behavioral Economics | June 25 th 2015 Agenda 1. Introduction 2. Behavioral economics


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Save More Tomorrow™: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving

by Richard H. Thaler and Shlomo Benartzi (2004)

Lukas Vorwerk | Experimental and Behavioral Economics | June 25th 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Behavioral economics and saving
  • 3. The SMarT program
  • 4. Additional simulations
  • 5. Conclusions

Save More Tomorrow™: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving | L. Vorwerk | June 29th 2015 page 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Goal: Design a program based on principles from psychology and behavioral economics to help people save more

  • 1. Introduction

Save More Tomorrow™: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving | L. Vorwerk | June 29th 2015 page 3

  • No willpower or self-control

needed

  • Employees have to actively

join and select their own savings rates

  • Evidence: some employees

contribute little or nothing

Defined-benefit plan Defined-contribution plan Life cycle theory of saving

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • 2. Behavioral economics and saving

Save More Tomorrow™: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving | L. Vorwerk | June 29th 2015 page 4

  • Determining the optimal savings rate is difficult
  • Saving requires self-control
  • Procrastination: tendency to postpone unpleasant tasks

Reasons for too little savings

  • Hyperbolic discounting

 Time-inconsistent behavior  Weighing current and near-term consumption especially heavily Procrastination

  • Status quo bias / inertia

 Tendency to like things to stay relatively the same

  • Loss aversion

 Tendency to weigh losses significantly more heavily than gains

Behavioral factors

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • 3. The SMarT program

Save More Tomorrow™: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving | L. Vorwerk | June 29th 2015 page 5

  • Time-lag between sign-up and first contribution to the plan as long as

possible

  • Contribution to the plan is only increased after pay raises
  • Contribution rate continues to increase on each scheduled pay raise until

a preset maximum is reached

  • The employee can opt out of the plan at any time

Main elements

  • Implemented in three firms
  • Implementation varied between firms

 Interaction with financial advisor  One-shot mailing  Financial education seminars

  • Particular design features vary as well

Implementation

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • 3. The SMarT program (cont’d)

Save More Tomorrow™: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving | L. Vorwerk | June 29th 2015 page 6

  • High take-up rate rate
  • Majority of participants remained in the plan (80%)
  • Participants ended up with a much higher saving rate than the rest

Results: 1st implementation

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • 3. The SMarT program (cont’d)

Save More Tomorrow™: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving | L. Vorwerk | June 29th 2015 page 7

  • Moderate take-up rates (13.4% &

26.5%)

  • Low dropout rates at Philips (5.4%)
  • Increasing in saving rates as

expected Results: 2nd & 3rd implementation

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • 4. Additional simulations

Save More Tomorrow™: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving | L. Vorwerk | June 29th 2015 page 8

  • Calculations for hypothetical

workers

 Different age and income profiles  Including social security and savings through defined-contribution plans

  • Replacement rates near 100%

assumed as adequate Savings Adequacy

  • Representative data from

retirement saving administrators

  • Calculations for three hypothetical

implementation strategies and different annual increments

  • Many other assumptions on

dropout rates etc. Widespread adoption

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • 5. Conclusions
  • The first experiences with the SMarT plan have been

quite successful

 Relatively high enrollment rates

  • Depends on the specific implementation strategy

 Low dropout rates  Great (but adequate) increase in saving rates

  • Recipe for success: SMarT makes use of the same

principles that typically prevent people from saving

  • Behavioral economics can be used to design effective

prescriptive programs for important economic decisions

Save More Tomorrow™: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving | L. Vorwerk | June 29th 2015 page 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Thank you for your attention!

Save More Tomorrow™: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving | L. Vorwerk | June 29th 2015 page 10