San Diego Wildfires 2003-2007 San Diego LAFCO Disaster Preparedness - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

san diego wildfires 2003 2007
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

San Diego Wildfires 2003-2007 San Diego LAFCO Disaster Preparedness - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

San Diego Wildfires 2003-2007 San Diego LAFCO Disaster Preparedness Role Background County Fire Services not required by State Law San Diego County divests direct responsibility for fire services in the unincorporated county (1975)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

San Diego Wildfires 2003-2007

San Diego LAFCO Disaster Preparedness Role

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background

  • County Fire Services not required by State Law
  • San Diego County divests direct responsibility for

fire services in the unincorporated county (1975)

  • Creates County Service Areas for fire protection

services in unincorporated county/communities

  • CSAs staffed by local volunteer firefighters
  • SD County provided various subsidies in addition

to annual property tax revenues to CSAs/FPDs

  • LAFCO role limited at that time
slide-3
SLIDE 3

2003 Wildfires (Cedar Fire)

  • Major wildfire event, burned over 280,000 acres

in San Diego County, over $1.3 Billion in damages

  • Involved all aspects of multi-jurisdictional

(State/County/Local) disaster preparedness:

– Local/Regional Emergency Communications – 1st Responders, Auto-Aid, Mutual-Aid – Equipment – planes, helicopters and engines

  • Resulted in the loss of 2,200 homes and 15 lives

– largest wildfire in California history*

slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6

2003 Wildfire Aftermath

  • How San Diego LAFCO responded:
  • Conducted studies analyzing funding and coordination

for local/regional fire protection/EMS services

  • Produced reports with recommendations for regional

fire protection consolidation, including activation of CSA latent fire protection/EMS powers

  • Collaborated with County and local Fire Agencies on

plans for a County Fire Authority

  • Developed Multi-Phase plan for consolidation of fire

protection/EMS services in the unincorporated County

slide-7
SLIDE 7

2007 Wildfires (Witch/Harris Fires)

  • 2nd major fire event in San Diego County within four

years, 2nd largest fire in California history

  • Burned over 198,000 acres, 1,000 homes destroyed, 2

lives lost, 55 firefighters injured

  • Total of 350,000 acres burned as fires merged, 500,000

people evacuated

  • Revealed continued inefficiencies with regional

emergency communication systems, evacuation chaos in some unincorporated communities

  • Accelerated local calls for fire regionalization
  • Highlighted need for prioritization and funding for

effective service levels and additional equipment

slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission

Reorganization of Structural Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Services in Unincorporated San Diego County

M I C R O R E P O R T

slide-14
SLIDE 14

San Diego County Fire Authority

  • Established in 2008 by LAFCO activation of

existing CSA’s latent power for fire protection and emergency medical services

  • Restricted to specific unincorporated areas of

county-wide CSA, covered over one-million acres

  • CSA 135 (Fire Authority) contracts with CALFIRE

for fire service operational responsibilities

  • Replacement of volunteer firefighters with

CALFIRE professionals in unincorporated areas

slide-15
SLIDE 15

LAFCO Role

  • Conducted Studies - Produced Macro/Micro Fire

Consolidation Reports

  • Assembled Advisory Task Force (Fire Chiefs)
  • Municipal Service Reviews/Determinations
  • Sphere of Influence Reviews/Determinations
  • Dissolution of volunteer CSAs and FPDs
  • Activation/Expansion of Latent Powers for Fire

Protection/Emergency Medical Services (EMS)

  • SOI Establishments/Amendments/Updates
  • Waived LAFCO processing fees for reorganizations
slide-16
SLIDE 16

2003-2018

  • Recent wildfire in December 2017 (Lilac Fire),

burned 4,100 acres, 157 buildings, 0 fatalities

  • Demonstrated improved local/regional

emergency communications and response

  • Total Fire Service Consolidations Since 2003:

– 6 CSAs dissolved – 2 FPDs dissolved – 7 Volunteer Fire Companies disbanded – San Diego County Fire Authority/CALFIRE – Elimination of unserved islands

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Continuing Issues

  • Local Control vs. Regionalization
  • Inadequate Funding – Property Taxes / Fees
  • Staffing levels – Volunteers / Professionals
  • Local-Regional Fire Dispatch Coordination and

Auto-Aid Agreements (Boundary Drop)

  • Special Tax Assessments to fund Fire Services

requires approval by 2/3 of local voters

  • Continued Development within Wildfire Areas
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Current LAFCO Efforts

  • Completing Dissolution of remaining CSAs/FPDs
  • Elimination of unserved islands
  • Improvements for local/regional fire dispatch
  • Auto-Aid Agreements (Boundary Drop)
  • Property Tax Exchange Agreements
  • Municipal Service Reviews
  • Sphere of Influence Updates
  • Encouraging Functional Consolidations
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Case Studies

  • Rancho Santa Fe Fire Protection District /

County Service Area No. 107 (Elfin Forest FD)

  • Pine Valley Fire Protection District / County

Service Area No. 135 (Fire Protection/EMS LP Area) – San Diego County Fire Authority

  • Heartland Fire & Rescue JPA (Cities of El Cajon,

La Mesa, & Lemon Grove)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Rancho Santa Fe FPD – CSA 107

  • Dissolution of CSA 107 volunteer fire department

(Elfin Forest-Harmony Grove)

  • Annexation to Rancho Santa Fe FPD
  • In 1987, LAFCO placed CSA 107 within SOI of the

much larger Rancho Santa Fe FPD

  • 2014 Reorganization supported by both agencies,

eliminated unserved islands (341 acres)

  • Extensive property tax negotiations with County

to achieve sustainable funding for RSFFPD

slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Pine Valley FPD – SD County Fire Authority (CSA 135 Fire LP Area)

  • Dissolution of volunteer FPD (Zero SOI)
  • Amendment to Service-Specific SOI for CSA

135 (Fire Protection)

  • Expansion of CSA 135 activated latent fire

protection and emergency medical services power area (SD County Fire Authority)

  • Staffed by CALFIRE via contract with County

Fire Authority

slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Heartland Fire & Rescue (JPA)

  • Functional Consolidation of Fire Departments for

Cities of El Cajon, La Mesa, Lemon Grove

  • 2010 JPA for organizational management of fire

protection, fire prevention services, emergency medical services, and community emergency preparedness

  • Consolidates Management/Coordinates Operations
  • Heartland Communications (Dispatch Services)
  • Unique cooperative fire services agreement provides

cost containment opportunities, while maintaining local control

slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Q/A

slide-28
SLIDE 28

What is LAFCO’s Role in Disaster Preparedness

Stephen Lucas, Butte Executive Officer CALAFCO Conference October 2018 Yosemite

slide-29
SLIDE 29

A Limited Role…until now.

  • Prior to the Oroville Dam Crisis, LAFCO had

little to no role to play.

  • We provided occasional mapping data and

shared contacts when specifically requested.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

A Whole New Level of Disaster!

Butte County has had many bad fires with significant losses of Property and personal injury. In 2017 the drought brought us the Ponderosa Fire,

  • ne of the most recent in Butte

County that burned only 4,016 acres, but destroyed 54 buildings…. but only a few short months took us from…

slide-31
SLIDE 31

too little rain…

slide-32
SLIDE 32

to way too much rain!

February 2017

slide-33
SLIDE 33

The Day of the Dammed!

February 7, 2017: Heavy rains inundate Oroville Lake Dam causing damage to the flood control spillway and forcing the use of the emergency spillway. Essentially free flowing uncontrolled water spills down from dam causing significant concerns about structural damages to both spillways. February 12, 2017: The Butte County Sheriff issues mandatory evacuation of approximately 80,000 Butte County residents and 100,00 more downstream in Sutter and Yuba Counties.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Infrastructure Fails!

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Get Out Now!

slide-36
SLIDE 36

How Fast to Act?

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Crisis Averted…cost of repairs now approaching $1B

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Now What?

  • A visit from the posse…and some questions?

–Department of Homeland Security –Federal Emergency Management Agency –CA State of Office of Emergency Services –CA Department of Water Resources

slide-39
SLIDE 39

A new paradigm and new role.

  • LAFCO as CONDUIT

– DATA and MAPPING – TRAININGS – COMMUNICATIONS – HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING (AB 2238 (Aguiar-

Curry) – Local hazard management.

– EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE – SHELTERING

slide-40
SLIDE 40

LAFCO as CONDUIT

  • One big issue for OEM is not knowing all the

resources available out there to help.

  • Butte

LAFCO will begin a collaborative relationship with the Butte County Office of Emergency Management to identify

  • pportunities not currently identified.
  • Rather than bog them down with data and

maps, we will rather maintain this data and have it ready and available in an emergency.

slide-41
SLIDE 41

DATA and MAPPING

  • Provide an updated list of special district

contacts.

  • Provide map layers of special districts to the

County to better identify stakeholders.

  • Provide description of district services.
slide-42
SLIDE 42

TRAININGS

  • Stakeholders are periodically invited to Office
  • f Emergency Management trainings.
  • Also included are private utilities such as PGE

and CalWater Service

slide-43
SLIDE 43

COMMUNICATIONS

  • Biggest

component

  • f

effective emergency response at a regional level is timely/accurate communication.

  • Too often, very quick, false or misleading

information is presented on social media that gets out in front of "official" communications. This causes the OEM to not only have to provide accurate updates, but forces them to counter/debunk inaccurate reports spread on social media.

  • The LAFCO website or social media account

could help?

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Hazard Mitigation Planning

  • Get involved in the Hazard Mitigation Plan process. This

may also allow for some limited funding to update maps

  • r contact protocols.
  • Help you local special districts understand their role in the

process.

  • Reclamation District 833 FEMA reimbursement related to

flooding damages.

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Emergency Assistance

Consider the resources available to your special districts and if they can help during an emergency response. Aside from the obvious (fire districts)…sewer, water, drainage, reclamation, mosquito abatement, recreation and park districts often have trained personnel and suitable equipment (portable lighting, generators, traffic control devices, etc) that could be loaned to the emergency response effort . District personnel often have their own safety training and equipment (lighting, protective gear, radios, etc) for their district. They could provide manpower and vehicles (dump trucks, backhoes, excavators, trucks with emergency lights) to such secondary efforts such as manning road closures, assisting in evacuations, and in some circumstances, debris removal, and drainage repairs .

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Sheltering

  • Many special districts have large facilities/buildings that could be

used to support staging, evacuation and sheltering efforts.

  • POST DISASTER RECOVERY
  • Special districts that provide back bone

services such as sewers, water, and electrical services, must be an integral part of recovery efforts.

slide-47
SLIDE 47

It’s Up to You?

  • Our previous “limited role” will now evolve.
  • LAFCO knowledge is often more valuable than

LAFCO authority.

  • Gotta go now…

LAFCO LAFCO

slide-48
SLIDE 48

City of Marysville

History and Status of Flood Protection Ricky Samayoa, Mayor and LAFCo Commissioner CALAFCO CONFERENCE OCTOBER 3RD, 2018

slide-49
SLIDE 49
  • The City is well aware of its flooding past.
  • The City knows it will never expand unless the

flooding problems are completely mitigated.

  • LAFCo is also aware of Marysville’s flooding

problems

  • The City of Marysville is addressing the

problem with a large levee project to protect residents and landowners in and around its boundaries

The City of Marysville is being proactive

slide-50
SLIDE 50
  • Marysville had a history of flooding, since the early Gold Rush days, that
  • worsened with impacts from hydraulic mining
  • Great floods in the 1860’s resulted in the State legislature forming the

Marysville

  • Levee Commission by special act March 6, 1876
  • The Levee Commission constructed the “Ring Levee” around Marysville
  • The U.S. Government eventually passed the Jackson Act in 1917
  • Locally constructed levees were improved to federal standards through

the

  • 1950’s as part of the Sacramento River Flood Control Project (SRFCP)
  • Project was completed and turned over to the State (Central Valley Flood
  • Protection Board, formerly The Reclamation Board) in 1953

Historical Background

slide-51
SLIDE 51
  • A levee breach in the City results in rapid

flooding

  • • The “risk to life” in Marysville is extremely

high:

  • • Escape routes become impassable within

1‐2 hours

  • • Entire City would be inundated within 24

hours

  • • Water temperatures below 50 degrees

Project Background – “Risk to Life”

slide-52
SLIDE 52

1955 Marysville Flood

slide-53
SLIDE 53

1966 Flooding in Marysville

slide-54
SLIDE 54
  • Federal Agencies - FEMA – USACOE
  • The Yuba County Water Agency and City of

Marysville

  • A Local Reclamation District (RD -784 in kind)

Funding A Collaborative Effort

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Protects approximately 12,700 residents and critical infrastructure (State Highways 20 and 70, major railways)

slide-56
SLIDE 56
  • Marysville has nowhere to expand therefore

growth occurs elsewhere in the unincorporated areas of Yuba County.

  • The City’s Sphere of Influence is constrained with

minimal expansion to the south only if the improved levees are completed.

  • LAFCo has a policy requiring flood planning and

will deny changes of organization without adequate provisions for Levees, Levee buffers and Levee Maintenance.

Yuba LAFCo Concerns

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Cobb Area Multi-Water Systems Consolidation

CALAFCo Annual Conference October 3, 2018 Yosemite, CA

slide-58
SLIDE 58

More than 50%

  • f Lake County has Burned since 2012

Including the Valley Fire in the Cobb Mountain Area

slide-59
SLIDE 59

destroyed more than 1,300 homes and killed at least four people. Resident Bo Stover said he won’t be around for the next big blaze. He’s tired of the displacement and dangers, and plans to move to Arkansas.

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Cobb Area County Water District Reorganization

The purpose of the Cobb Area County Water District (Cobb) reorganization is to realize government structure in a fire damaged portion of Lake County by consolidating and repairing nine separate water systems into one new unified system with a stronger rate base, management and with political accountability under the existing Cobb Area County Water District. The underlying smaller, damaged, outdated and inefficient agencies are dissolved or disbanded. In the end, the reorganization will benefit the community— banded together, these agencies are stronger than standing alone.

60

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Regionalization

Cobb Area historically has many small water systems which lacked the economies of scale to maintain infrastructure and to provide the necessarily reliability to their customers.

61

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Cobb Area Drinking Water

Cobb Area has:

  • 11 public water systems regulated by SWRCB’s

Division of Drinking Water

  • 1 county state small water system—Alpine

Meadows

  • 1 area with no regulation of water—

Whispering Pines

  • Individual wells

62

slide-63
SLIDE 63

63

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Cobb Area Water Systems

Cobb Area CWD Adams Springs Pine Grove CSA #7 Bonanza Springs CSA #18 Starview CSA #22 Mount Hannah Branding Iron Hill 9 & 10 Alpine Meado ws Total Pre-fire # connections 677 77 91 177 142 36 27 17 14 1258 Pre-fire population 1403 200 267 450 400 100 90 43 50 3003 Aug 2017 # connections 500 36 84 131 55 36 27 17 12 898 Post-fire population 1403 99 267 291 40 100 90 43 2333 Service area, acres 1160 210 120 2240 130 40 40 230 20 4190

64

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Consolidation as Solution: what LAFCo Found

  • Larger public water systems have:

– Technical, managerial and financial capacity – Source and equipment redundancy – Ability to access funding – Economies of scale – Larger pool of ratepayers – Accountability to elected leadership

  • Water provided by public water systems (>15

connections1) is subject to regulation by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the State of California, including regular monitoring and testing for contaminants

65

1 Lake County Environmental Health permits & inspects systems w/5-14 connections

slide-66
SLIDE 66

LAFCo’s vision towards a Better Future

  • Board of directors positions filled by the rate

payers

  • More community based control of the water

system

  • Faster and more professional service
  • Economies of scale – capital improvement, O&M
  • Better access to grants and loans
  • Future savings in base rate across the entire

system

66

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Cobb Reorganization/Consolidation Meets Statewide Goals & Local Needs

  • Meets LAFCo’s goal of creating more effective, efficient

and orderly local government by reducing the number

  • f service providers and allowing for a stronger and

more stable unit of local government accountable to rate payers and voters.

  • Meets State Water Board goal of promoting and

creating efficient, sustainable public water systems through the consolidation of multiple small systems into a larger stronger public system.

  • Meets local needs of improved water supply

67

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Consolidation Makes Sense !

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Jan Coppinger – Lake County Special Districts Calafco October 3, 2018

The Valley Fire

slide-70
SLIDE 70
slide-71
SLIDE 71
slide-72
SLIDE 72
slide-73
SLIDE 73
slide-74
SLIDE 74
slide-75
SLIDE 75
slide-76
SLIDE 76
slide-77
SLIDE 77
slide-78
SLIDE 78
slide-79
SLIDE 79
slide-80
SLIDE 80
slide-81
SLIDE 81
slide-82
SLIDE 82

Disaster and partnership, The silver lining

Michelle Frederick, P.E. Water Partnership Coordinator, Northern California Division of Drinking Water State Water Resources Control Board

slide-83
SLIDE 83

Human Right to Water Portal

  • 7,400 Public Water Systems in

CA

  • Red Stars Represent Water

Systems with Violations in Community Water Systems or Schools

  • 90% of Violations Occur in

Water Systems Serving Less than 500 connections

https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/hr2 w/index.html

slide-84
SLIDE 84

Comparison with other utilities

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000

Public Water Systems Wastewater Treatment Plants Electricity Utilities

900 75 7442 77% of the Community Water Systems in CA serve less than 1,000 connections Small water systems have poor economies of scale and limited emergency response capabilities.

slide-85
SLIDE 85

2018 SWRCB Drinking Water Priorities

  • Decreasing systems with violations

EPA requiring 25% reduction by 2022 Voluntary/mandatory consolidation in some cases

  • Decreasing unsustainable water systems through

partnership/consolidation

  • Stopping the formation of new unsustainable water systems
  • Ensuring water systems have adequate financial capacity to deal

with aging infrastructure

  • Education of county planning community and emergency staff
slide-86
SLIDE 86

SWRCB—Funding consolidations

  • Small disadvantaged community water

systems and public schools

– Eligible for grant funding, as available (up to $45,000 per connection) – technical assistance funding

  • Non-disadvantaged and non-community

water systems can get 1.8% loans

  • Consolidation Incentive Program for Larger

Water Systems

– Consolidate Disadvantaged Water Systems with

slide-87
SLIDE 87

Cobb consolidation

$277,000 Emergency State Money on Drought and Storage Tank Failure

  • - Mt. Hannah

Hill Nine and Ten Source Capacity Issues Well Drilled in Solid Obsidian In 2014, Adams Springs Water System had 690 counts of E.coli in its only water source Pine Grove Water System was abandoned by owners and under receivership since 1990’s

Rural, Independent- Minded Community