sam a l abi b md e ric giza md
play

SAM A. L ABI B, MD / E ric Giza , MD e mo ryhe a lthc a re - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PE RONE AL T E ARS & DISL OCAT IONS: OPE N RE PAIR F OR RE L IABL E RE SUL T S SAM A. L ABI B, MD / E ric Giza , MD e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho DISCLOSURES FOR LABIB Re se a rc h/ F e llo wshi p F


  1. PE RONE AL T E ARS & DISL OCAT IONS: OPE N RE PAIR F OR RE L IABL E RE SUL T S SAM A. L ABI B, MD / E ric Giza , MD e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

  2. DISCLOSURES FOR LABIB • Re se a rc h/ F e llo wshi p F unding : Arthre x, Ossur, L inva te c • Co nsulta nt: Arthre x, Me dsha pe , Stryke r

  3. PERONEAL TENDONS • Primary Function – Eversion – Plantar flexion of the ankle and first ray • Dynamic stabilizers of the ankle and subtalar joints Reed, Giza et al., Orthopaedic Knowledge Update: Sports Medicine 4, W.B. Kibler, Editor. 2009, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

  4. SUPERIOR PERONEAL RETINACULUM • SPR: important for peroneal stability • 2 arms – 1 to Achilles sheath – 1 to calcaneus (posterior and lateral to CFL) Ogawa & Thordarson. Foot & Ankle International/Vol. 28, No. 9/September 2007

  5. PE RONE ALT E NDONS + SPN – Pe ro ne a l T e ndo ns – De la ye d re c ruitme nt in Unsta b le a nkle s – K a rlsso n& Andre a sso n AJSM,1992 – SPN Se c tio n Study: 15 % o f Sta tic sta b ilize rs Ha tc h & L a b ib JOSA 2003

  6. RETROMALLEOLAR SULCUS • Retromalleolar Sulcus – 5-10 mm wide – Cartilage rim = 2-4 mm • Cadaver Study – 82% had a concave sulcus – 7% had a convex sulcus – 11% had a flat sulcus Edwards, E. Am. J. Anat. 42: 213 – 252, 1927.

  7. PERONEAL INJURY • Acute – Sudden dorsiflexion with firing of peroneal tendons – back side of a mogul while skiing – Inversion with the foot in plantarflexion • Chronic – Repeated sprains, varus hindfoot lead to attenuation of SPR and synovitis

  8. ZONE OF INJURY • Zone 1 Injury: Fibular groove area – Often associated with P. Brevis • Zone 2 Injury: cuboid tunnel – Often associated with P. Longus Shawen & Anderson, Tech. Foot Ankle Surg. 3:118 – 125, 2004

  9. HISTORY & EXAMINATION • Lateral tenderness • Popping at ankle when everting or “driving to the hoop” • Test with knee flexed, the ankle is actively dorsiflexed and plantarflexed with resisted eversion

  10. RADIOGRAPH • “Fleck Sign” • Pathognomonic for peroneal tendon dislocation • Fragment of bone is lateral to the distal fibula metaphysis

  11. MRI FINDINGS • Axial T1 images – Lateral/anterior displacement of brevis – Contour of the posterior fibula – Tear of brevis • Mickey Mouse or Tie-Wing fighter

  12. MRI FINDINGS • Axial T1 images – Lateral/anterior displacement of brevis – Contour of the posterior fibula – Tear of brevis • Mickey Mouse or Tie-Wing fighter

  13. MRI FINDINGS • Co ro na l ima g e s – L a te ra l/ a nte rio r displa c e me nt o f b re vis • MRI ne e ds to b e c o rre la te d with c linic a l e xa m – 56 pa tie nts with (+) MRI – 27/ 56 ha d (+) e xa m – 48% Po sitive Pre dic tive Va lue Giza E, Mak W et al. A clinical and radiological study of peroneal tendon pathology. Foot & ankle specialist. 2013 Dec;6(6):417-21.

  14. PERONEAL TENDON DISLOCATION • Peroneal Tendon Subluxation – Grade 1: SPR stripped from fibula – Grade 2: Fibrocartilage rim stripped – Grade 3: Bony avulsion • Fleck sign Eckert, W; Davis, E:. J.Bone Joint Surg. 58-A:670 – 673, 1976.

  15. superior personal retinacular injury fibula Peroneal tendons

  16. PERONEAL TENDON SUBLUXATION

  17. PERONEAL TENDON SUBLUXATION

  18. ACUTE DISLOCATION TREATMENT • Immobilization can be attempted • Escalas found 28 (74%) of 38 patients had no improvement after immobilization • Operative treatment recommended in most cases with 95% success* Escalas et al, J. Bone Joint Surg. 62-A:451 – 453, 1980. *Eckert, W; Davis, E:. J.Bone Joint Surg. 58-A:670 – 673, 1976.

  19. CASE EXAMPLE – ACUTE REPAIR • 50 year old active male skiier – forced dorsiflexion injury • MRI and exam demonstrate dislocation of brevis laterally • SPR denuded from lateral fibula – Normal sulcus

  20. ACUTE DISLOCATION

  21. ACUTE REPAIR CONCEPTS 1. Re sto re pe rio ste um a nd SPR to la te ra l fib ula b o ne Fibula 2. Re -e sta b lish fib ro c a rtila g e no us rim 3. Se c ure ly re pa ir SPR with e no ug h spa c e fo r te ndo n g liding • Gro o ve de e pe ning ra re ly ne c e ssa ry in Fibula a c ute re pa ir

  22. ACUTE REPAIR • Anchors or Bone Tunnels • Double Row Repair • Non Absorbable Suture

  23. ACUTE REPAIR • Prepare lateral fibula to create a good bed for repair

  24. ACUTE REPAIR 1. Re sto re pe rio ste um a nd SPR to la te ra l fib ula b o ne 2. Re -e sta b lish fib ro c a rtila g e no us rim

  25. ACUTE REPAIR Anchors Placed Rim Restored

  26. ACUTE REPAIR Re pair with fr e e r e le vator 2 limbs of suture in she ath to c r e ate preseved e nough spac e for gliding

  27. ACUTE REPAIR Pe rioste um Se c ure d ba c k to fibula

  28. ACUTE TENDON DISLOCATION REPAIR

  29. ACUTE REPAIR

  30. ACUTE ON CHRONIC OR CHRONIC TEARS • Brevis or Longus split tear from inversion or age related degeneration – Less than 30% = remove

  31. ACUTE ON CHRONIC OR CHRONIC TEARS • Brevis or Longus split tear from inversion or age related degeneration – Approx 50% = repair

  32. ACUTE ON CHRONIC OR CHRONIC TEARS • Brevis or Longus split tear from inversion or age related degeneration – >75% = anastamosis of longus or brevis • Allograft in young patient

  33. CHRONIC SUBLUXATION • Add grove deepening • U shaped saw cut in grove (preserve periosteum) • Tamp in place • Repair attenuated SPR with method above • Good results reported at 2 yrs Shawen & Anderson, Tech. Foot Ankle Surg. 3:118 – 125, 2004

  34. LOW LYING PERONEUS BREVIS • Low lying peroneus brevis muscle into the fibular groove can cause: – Stretching of the SPR – Longitudinal splitting of the peroneus brevis tendon – Peroneal tenosynovitis ’ Sobel, M; Bohne, WHO; O Brien, SJ: Acta Orthop. Scand. 63:682 – 684, 1992.

  35. PERONEAL TENDON DYSFUNCTION • Anomalous Muscles – Peroneus Quartus – Peroneocalcaneous Internus – Long accessory to FDL or QP – Tibiocalcaneous internus – Accesory soleus Best, Giza, Sullivan, JBJS Am, 2005

  36. Peroneus Quartus Peroneal tendons

  37. PERONEUS QUARTUS • Ofte n a c a use o f c o ntinue d pa in a fte r a nkle spra in • I nse rtio n o n la te ra l c a lc a ne us • E xc isio n with re pa ir o f a tte nua te d SPR pre fe rre d me tho d o f tre a tme nt Best, Giza, Sullivan, JBJS Am, 2005

  38. SUB- ACUT E F RACT URE OF OS PE RONE UM Excision with direct repair using 2-0 Fiberwire performed

  39. • Ope rative T e c hnique • F ib ula r g ro o ve de e pe ning – 6c m c urviline a r inc isio n ma de o ve r pa th o f pe ro ne a l te ndo ns po ste rio r to fib ula – Re tina c ulum disse c te d a t po ste rio r a spe c t o f fib ula , 3mm sle e ve o f re tina c ulum a tta c he d to fib ula – F ib ro sse o us she a th o ste o to mize d o ff po ste rio r a spe c t o f fib ula a nd hing e d po ste rio rly – 3mm ro und b ur use d to de e pe n unde rlying fib ula , re mo ving 7- 9mm o f b o ne – F ib ro o se o us she a th impa c te d b a c k into de e pe ne d g ro o ve with b o ne impa c to r • Re tina c ulum re pa ir – Po uc h fo rme d b y b o ny surfa c e o f la te ra l ma lle o lus a nd supe rio r pe ro ne a l re tina c ulum e xpo se d – Drilling o f K irsc hne r-wire into la te ra l ma lle o lus to pro duc e b le e ding – 3-4 ho le s ma de a lo ng po ste rio r b o rde r o f lo we r fib ula – Sle e ve o f re ina c ulum a nd pe rio ste um a dva nc e d po ste rio r in ve st-o ve r-pa nts fa shio n – Do ub le -ro w re pa ir with 2.0 no n-a b so rb a b le suture s – 5.5 mm c a the te r re mo ve d a fte r re tina c ulum wa s suture d – Ankle ma inta ine d in e ve rsio n a nd slig ht do rsifle xio n e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

  40. • Me a n AOF AS sc o re impro ve d sig nific a ntly fro m 59.3 po ints pre o pe ra tive ly to 92.2 po ints a t the fina l fo llo w-up in g ro up A a nd fro m 58.5 po ints pre o pe ra tive ly to 91.3 po ints a t the fina l fo llo w-up in g ro up B. • Me a n VAS sc o re a lso impro ve d sig nific a ntly fro m 5.0 po ints pre o pe ra tive ly to 1.0 po ints a t the fina l fo llo w-up in g ro up A a nd fro m 4.9 po ints pre o pe ra tive ly to 1.2 po ints a t the fina l fo llo w-up in g ro up B. • e s a t the fina l fo llo w-up Impr ove me nts in AOF AS and VAS sc or we re no t sig nific a ntly diffe re nt b e twe e n the 2 g ro ups. Me an time to r e tur n to spor ts ac tivity was appr oximate ly 3 months in oups . Me a n to urniq ue t time in g ro up B wa s sig nific a ntly both gr sho rte r tha n tha t in g ro up A (42.2 vs 29.5 min). • Conc lusion: Isolate d r e pair > IR +Gr oove De e pe ning e mo ryhe a lthc a re .o rg / o rtho

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend