Sala Giunta - Palazzo Comunale - Piazza del Comune Prato M arch 9, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The sole responsibility for the content of this presentation lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European

• Communities. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.

Patrizia, M algieri - Supervisor Rossano Rocchi - Head of M obility and Infrastructures Dept. Prato’s SUM P Study visits to BUM P pioneer cities Sala Giunta - Palazzo Comunale - Piazza del Comune – Prato M arch 9, 2016

1. The city: main territorial characteristics 2. SUM P Process in the city 3. Developing the SUM P process in the city 3.1 SUM P Phase 1 - Preparing well Analysis mobility situation and current scenario 3.2 SUM P Phase 2 - Rational and transparent goal setting: Develop a vision and engage citizens Set priorities and target Develop effective measures packages 3.3 SUM P Phase 3 - Elaborating the plan Develop SUM P Scenario Evaluation of SUM P Scenario (technical support) Assessment of SUM P (M onitoring design) List of indicators Summary

Prato, historical city with 190,000 inhabitants Second city in Tuscany by population (after Florence) and one

• f the first textile district in Europe
• 1. The city: main territorial characteristics

Demographic evolution

• Positive trend between 2005 and 2014
• 75% of the population of the Province

live in Prato

4

Prato Province Prato City

• 1. The city: main territorial characteristics

5

Demographic distribution

• 1. The city: main territorial characteristics

Source: Comune di Prato, 2014

6

Source: Comune di Prato, 2014

Foreign population and nationality

• 1. The city: main territorial characteristics

Economic activities and employees

7

City of Prato: economic activities and employeesi, 2011 (Source: ISTAT)

SETTORE UNITA’ LOCALI 2001 UNITA’ LOCALI 2011 ADDETTI 2001 ADDETTI 2011 Agricoltura e pesca 33 12 46 40 Industria estrattiva 1 1 Industria manifatturiera 5.582 5.547 28.693 24.707 Energia, gas e acqua 6 35 156 362 Costruzioni 2.416 2.573 5.959 5.433 Commercio e riparazioni 5.098 5.370 12.329 14.166 Alberghi e pubblici esercizi 514 824 1.676 3.058 Trasporti e comunicazione 724 605 3.730 4.882 Credito e assicurazioni 543 544 2.657 2.024 Altri servizi 6.062 8.302 13.392 17.499 Totale 20.979 23.812 68.639 72.171

• 79% of the Province employees are

based in Prato (72,825 / 92,096 total)

• The city of microenterprise: 71% of

the activities has 2 employees

• 34% of activities are industrial

(textile)

• 1. The city: main territorial characteristics

Schools and health services

8

Schools Health services

• 1. The city: main territorial characteristics

Policy Makers Commitment

• Prato Municipality involved in the BUMP

project

• Eltis SUMP Guidelines (2014) as a result
• f the urban action of the EU Transport

Policy and White Paper EU (2011)

• EU Structural Funds 2014-2020 -

Tuscany Region for the mobility measures is conditioned to the SUMP (or similar strategic mobility plan) adopted by the municipalities

• Sustainable Energy Action Plan adopted

by the Municipality of Prato (2015) - promoted by the Covenant of Mayors

• 2. SUM P Process in the city

SET II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II

1

Acquisizione infor mazioni e r icostr uzione scenar io anno base Progettazione della campagna di indagine (traffico, sosta, interviste, web) Esecuzione indagini ed elaborazioni (non a cura di TRT) Coordinamento e processo partecipativo Coordinamento con GdL incaricato allo sviluppo del modello di simulazione del traffico

2

Valutazione dello scenario attuale Individuazione degli obiettivi generali e specifici Definizione e condivisione con l'Amministrazione delle linee di indirizzo

3

Costr uzione dello Scenar io di Rifer imento Costr uzione Scenar i di Piano Valutazione comparativa degli Scenari (SR vs SP...) Condivisione con la comunità locale Selezione dello scenar io vincente da parte del decisore pubblico Stima dei costi di investimento

4

Revisione degli scenar i di Piano Predisposizione elaborati Disegno del sistema di monitoraggio Piano esecutivo delle attività Rapporto di sintesi Rapporto di seconda fase Proposta di Piano Versione definitiva/ completa del Piano Condivisione del cronoprogramma (fine settembre 2015) Piano esecutivo delle attività (fine settembr e 2015) Rapporto di sintesi (metà ottobre 2015) Rapporto di seconda fase (dicembre 2015) Proposta di Piano (febbraio 2016) Documento di Piano (aprile 2016) Mesi

Scadenze Elaborati

COMUNE di PRATO - PIANO URBANO della MOBILITA' SOSTENIBILE OTT

Elaborazione del Piano e quantificazione delle risorse

NOV DIC

Attività propedeutiche al processo di Piano e processo partecipativo Valutazione dello scenario attuale e definizione degli obiettivi specifici Approvazione, implementazione e monitoraggio del Piano

GEN FEB MAR APR Attività

• 2. SUM P Process in the city: definition of the timeline

• 2. SUM P process and state of the art

Analysis of the situation and current scenario Transport supply

Road characteristics and access regulation Public transport network and services Parking (pricing/ regulation, all data in the report) Cycling Sharing mobility Logistics (infrastructure and service)

Transport demand

O-D matrix (2011) On-line survey (2015) Public transport passengers Traffic surveys (2015) Parking demand (2015-2016)

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 1 - Preparing well

Transport supply: Road network hierarchy and Traffic simulation model (Aimsun)

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 1 - Preparing well

Transport supply: Access regulation to the city center City centre: restricted and controlled area

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 1 - Preparing well

Transport supply: Public transport network Database and transport modelling description:

• Route
• Bus*km/year, day
• Frequences/day
• Speed evarage
• Stops
• 3. The SUM P - Phase 1 - Preparing well

Transport supply: Rail network and services

Line Regional Sevices Long distance services Prato - Firenze 67/ 70 6/ 6 Prato - Bologna 18/ 18 6/ 6 Prato - Lucca (- Viareggio) 26/ 28 0/ 0

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 1 - Preparing well

Transport supply: Cycle network

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 1 - Preparing well

Transport supply: Car sharing «Free floating» model (started in November 2015)

• perated by Car2Go

Connected to Florence

• perative area

The SUM P - Phase 1 - Preparing well

Transport supply: City logistics and intermodality Prato terminal capacity

• 4 traks (600 m)
• 4 trains/day
• 60.000 TEU/year

Access restriction in the city centre: different permits and pricing based on different type of vehicles and users

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 1 - Preparing well

Transport demand: commuters - matrix analysis (2011)

• 125,415 trips per day
• 60% inside the city of Prato

(74,136)

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 1 - Preparing well

Internal (origin and destination in the city of Prato) Attracted (trips to Prato) Generated (trips from Prato)

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 1 - Preparing well

Transport demand: modal split (commuters, 2011)

M odal split by purpuse

Transport mode M odal Split % TOTAL M ALES FEM ALES

Walk

15,2% 15,6% 14,9%

Bike

9,2% 10,7% 7,9%

Car

40,8% 34,4% 46,3%

M otorcycle

10,8% 16,4% 5,9%

Bus

21,9% 21,2% 22,5%

T

• tal

100,0% 100,0% 100,0% Transport Shopping Affairs Leisure TOT. M F TOT. M F TOT. M F

Walk

15,3% 13,2% 17,0% 16,8% 14,8% 18,4% 20,6% 19,6% 21,4%

Bike

5,2% 5,0% 5,3% 8,1% 9,2% 7,1% 8,8% 11,6% 6,3%

Car

63,4% 63,1% 63,7% 55,3% 50,0% 59,8% 48,4% 42,7% 53,3%

M otorcycle

7,1% 10,2% 4,4% 10,9% 16,7% 5,9% 11,7% 17,6% 6,7%

Bus

8,9% 8,2% 9,5% 8,5% 8,6% 8,5% 9,5% 8,0% 10,8%

Train

0,2% 0,3% 0,1% 0,5% 0,8% 0,3% 1,0% 0,5% 1,5%

T

• tal

100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

Transport demand: on line survey - November 2015 (1,523 responses)

M odal split by gender

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 1 - Preparing well

Transport demand: traffic survey, flows 2015

Vehicles distribution by hour

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 1 - Preparing well

Transport demand: traffic survey, flows 2015

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 1 - Preparing well

Parking space supply and demand (survey results)

M orning Afternoon Night

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 1 - Preparing well

Current scenario: environmental and social impacts

TIPO RIF. CENTRALINA 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 LIM ITI DI LEGGE PM 10

Concentrazioni medie annuali µg/ m

3

Roma 31 30 30 27 25

40 µg/ m

3

Ferrucci 33 35 31 30 25

N

• giorni di

superamento della media giornaliera di 50 µg/ m

3

Roma 30 43 43 35 30

35 superamenti di 50 µg/ m

3

Ferrucci 45 50 44 37 28 PM 2,5

Concentrazioni medie annuali µg/ m

3

Roma 22 22 22 20 17

25 µg/ m

3

NO2

Concentrazioni medie annuali µg/ m

3

Roma 30 32 36 33 27

40 µg/ m

3

Ferrucci 48 * * 27 34

N

• giorni di

superamento della massima media

• raria 200 µg/ m

3

Roma 1 2

< 18 superamenti massima media

• raria 200 µg/ m

3

Ferrucci * * 1 C

6H6

* *

Roma 0,6

5 µg/ m

3

Source: European Environment Agency, 2012 Source: ARPAT - Prato, 2010-2014

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 1 - Preparing well

Source: Local Police, 2012-2014

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 1 - Preparing well

Current scenario: environmental and social impacts - Road safety

Source: Polizia Municipale Prato, 2012-2014

Y ear Pedestrians (dead and njured) T

• tal

accidentes Number % Number

2012 136 15,7 865 2013 151 17,3 874 2014 165 20,6 800 Total 452 17,8 2.539

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 1 - Preparing well

Current scenario: environmental and social impacts - Pedestrian accidents

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 2 - Rational and transparent goal setting

Develop common a vision: engage citizens in the participatory process ON Line Survey (October-November 2015)

http:/ /goo.gl/ YfT4H9

3 Focus Group (February-M arch 2016)

• Public space
• Public transport and sharing services
• City Logistics

Territorial Laboratories (M arch-April 2016)

M AIN PROBLEM S CAR SPEED ROAD CROSSINGS STREET LIGHTING TIM ETABLE ACCURACY COST FREQUENCIES DECORUM PARKING SPECE ROAD M AINTENANCE TRAFFIC By foot By bike By city bus By coach/ train By car

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 2 - Rational and transparent goal setting

Set priorities and targets

According to the SUMP Guidelines (see www.eltis.org): “a Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan aims to create a sustainable urban transport system by addressing -at least- the following objectives: a) ensure accessibility offered by the transport system is available to all; b) improve safety and security; c) reduce air and noise pollution, greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption; d) improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the transportation of persons and goods; e) contribute to enhancing the attractiveness and quality of the urban environment and urban design”. Each objective should be identified by targets and indicators (described in section 3.3)

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 2 - Rational and transparent goal setting

Setting the objectives is a crucial step in developing transport policies and action Two fundamental factors are involved in defining an objective:

• Timescale of the policy (short vs

long term implementation and impacts)

• Results (sustainable domain and

intensity) The “ SM ART” approach helps in this quite complex task of defining objectives

• f transport policy

SMART Dimension Specific – select understandable objectives Measurable – the success or failure of the objectives and targets Achievable – set the target and timing Realistic In a practical sense, is it really possible to achieve the

target with your available resources?

Time-bound In a practical sense, is it really possible to achieve

the target with your available resources?

Set priorities and targets

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 2 - Rational and transparent goal setting

Set priorities and targets

GENERAL OBJ

ECTIVES

SPECIFICOBJ

ECTIVES

SUSTAINABLE M OBILITY To meet the different needs of mobility (residents, businesses, city users)

To reduce car (and motorcycle) dependency in favor of sustainable transport modes (walking, cycling, public transport), in particular for inner travels To guarantee city accessibility through the optimization of the transport supply and the integration of the transport modes To make compatible the use of streets and squares considering the needs of different road users (pedestrians, cyclists and PT users), especially in highly-populated areas and near schools To encourage good behavior in personal mobility choices and in the use of the streets (enforcement)

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 2 - Rational and transparent goal setting

Set priorities and targets

GENERAL OBJ

ECTIVES

SPECIFICOBJ

ECTIVES

EQUITY , SAFETY AND SOCIAL INCLUSION To ensure adequate health, safety, accessibility and information for all

To reduce road accidents, with particular attention to vulnerable road users (pedestrians, cyclists, motorcyclists) - “Vision Zero” To guarantee easy access to mobility services and public space To raise awareness of (and the freedom of choice to) the availability of more sustainable transport modes, by improving information on mobility services for residents, businesses and city users

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 2 - Rational and transparent goal setting

Set priorities and targets

GENERAL OBJ

ECTIVES

SPECIFICOBJ

ECTIVES

QUALITY OF THE ENVIRONM ENT To promote and improve environmental sustainability

To reduce air pollution emissions of the transport sector (PM 10, PM 2.5, NOx and ozone precursors) as well as pollutants linked to “proximity traffic” (Black carbon) To reduce energy and fossil fuels consumption To reduce greenhouse gas emissions (CO2) To reduce the population's exposure to noise, giving priority to the protection of the most sensitive areas (schools, hospitals,… ) To improve the quality of the urban landscape and contain land consumption

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 2 - Rational and transparent goal setting

Set priorities and targets

GENERAL OBJ

ECTIVES

SPECIFICOBJ

ECTIVES

INNOVATION AND ECONOM IC EFFICIENCY To enhance innovation

• pportunities and

pursue economic sustainability and efficiency

To make efficient and effective public spending on infrastructure and mobility services To make explicit and internalize the environmental, health and social costs in public policies To promote economic efficiency of commercial traffic (urban logistics) To optimize the use of mobility resources by the enhancement of “shared” mobility (car, bike) as well as the promotion of technological and management innovation and management in the transport sector

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 3 - Elaborating the plan

Develop SUM P Scenario

FOCUS

• Territorial scale
• Long and short

term period

• Policy integration

(land use- mobility- environment)

POLICY

• Quality and

regulation of Public Space

• Vision Zero
• Walkability and

Accessibility

• Cycling
• Public transport
• Parking regulation
• City Logistics

Instruments

• Pricing (park)
• ITS (smart mobility)
• E-mobility

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 3 - Elaborating the plan

Evaluation of SUM P Scenario (technical support)

Technical Instruments

• Urban Transport Model

(micro-meso) AIMSUM Strategic Instruments

• Urban Road Map (test)

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 3 - Elaborating the plan

Assessment of SUM P (M onitoring design) List of main indicators

Category Item Indicator

Public Transport Services PT lines Km Stops N. Supply Bus* km/ day or year Seat* km/ year Demand Passengers/ year and PT line and type Cycling Length of lane/ routes Km (by different type of infrastructure) Demand

• N. of users - (bike counter/ main cycle paths)

Bike sharing

• N. of bikes and parking racks
• N. of users/ year

Transport System Road and public space Km Restricted traffic zone (Km2) Traffic flow by vehicle type Average vehicles per hour by vehicle type - peak Average vehicles per hour by vehicle type - off peak

• N. of vehicles/ day or hour

Goods vehicles moving in demo areas % HLV (goods vehicles) moving in area Parking supply

• N. of parking spots (total)
• N. of parking spots: pricing and regulation

M otorisation rate Veh./ 1000 inhabitants M odal split Average modal split (passengers)

Transport

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 3 - Elaborating the plan

Category Item Indicator

Air quality and GHG Emissions CO Kg/ year NOx Kg/ year Particulate (PM 10 and/ or PM 2.5 ) Kg/ year VOC Kg/ year CO2 Kg/ year Energy Consumption Vehicle fuel efficiency Fuel consumption (ton./ year) Fuel mix % of electric vehicles

Environment and energy Assessment of SUM P (M onitoring design) List of main indicators

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 3 - Elaborating the plan

Society

Category Item Indicator

Participatory process Stakeholder and Citizen engagement

• N. of meetings (by difefrent type)
• N. of stakeholderds and citizens
• N. of web contacts

Dissemination

• N. of public events and press communications

Accessibility Spatial Accessibility % inhab. located in a 300/ 500 m radius from PT stops

• N. of bus stops with high accessibility standard

Safety Injuries and deaths caused by transport modes

• N. of accidents, injuries, fatalities/ year
• N. of accidents, injuries, fatalities/ year and

geolocation

Assessment of SUM P (M onitoring design) List of main indicators

• 3. The SUM P - Phase 3 - Elaborating the plan

Financing

Category Item Indicator

Public Administration Costs Capital costs per system or unit (€ total and €/ year) Operating costs €/ year

Assessment of SUM P (M onitoring design) List of main indicators

Thank you for your attention!

Patrizia M algieri Transport planner, technical cunsultant Prato’s SUM P TRT Trasporti e Territorio Via Rutilia 10/ 8 M ilan, Italy malgieri@trt.it SKYPE: trt.malgieri www.trt.it