Safety Conscious Work Environment Rulemaking -- Is it the Answer? - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

safety conscious work environment rulemaking is it the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Safety Conscious Work Environment Rulemaking -- Is it the Answer? - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Safety Conscious Work Environment Rulemaking -- Is it the Answer? Billie Pirner Garde Clifford, Lyons & Garde Washington, D.C. December 17, 2002 Key Question: Do current NRC processes assure the free flow of information from employees


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Safety Conscious Work Environment Rulemaking -- Is it the Answer?

Billie Pirner Garde Clifford, Lyons & Garde Washington, D.C. December 17, 2002

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Key Question:

Do current NRC processes assure the free flow of information from employees about potential safety concerns?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Current Agency Process

No comprehensive programmatic

  • approach to handling of

retaliation complaints Current process result of thirty

  • years of reactive policy

development

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Current Agency Process (continued)

Present HIRD/50.7 process viewed as having serious flaws

  • untimely, ineffective

and inconsistent

  • unfair to those raising allegations

and to those accused

  • is not transparent
slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Current Agency Process (continued)

Does not improve safety

  • Does not protect employees
  • from retaliation

Does not enhance public

  • confidence
slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Finding A Path Forward

Establish “results oriented”

  • evaluation and oversight process

Require licensees to establish and

  • maintain a SCWE with clearly

defined attributes and performance indicators Require licensees to comply with

  • 10 CFR §50.7 and DOL regulations

for responding to HIRD events

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

“Safety culture is that assembly of characteristics and attitudes in

  • rganizations and individuals

which establishes that, as an

  • verriding priority, nuclear plant

safety issues receive the attention warranted by their significance.” 75-INSAG-4

Safety Culture Defined

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Common SCWE Attributes

Management commitment

  • A questioning attitude
  • Conservative decision making
  • Mutual trust of workforce
  • Alternative avenue, i.e.,

ECP

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

  • Open communication
  • Reward for SCWE behaviors
  • Safety ahead of production
  • Zero tolerance for retaliation
  • Training programs
  • Robust corrective

action program

Common SCWE Attributes (continued)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

SCWE Performance Indicators

Subjective and objective

  • measurement tools
  • Unique to individual work

environments

  • Consistent with size of

program, degree of risk, historical performance

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Benefits of SCWE Rule

Proactive regulatory program to

  • upgrade industry performance

Comprehensive regulatory

  • program for SCWE, HIRD (OI and

IE), §50.7 and §50.5 issues

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Benefits of SCWE Rule (continued)

Provides incentives for self-

  • critical analysis on HIRD issues

Promotes early resolution of

  • disputes

Does not increase regulatory

  • burdens on licensees
slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Risks of SCWE Rule

Perception of NRC abandonment

  • f HIRD issues by management

and employees Unhealthy work environments

  • require substantial effort and
  • versight
slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Process Issues: SCWE

SCWE rulemaking will provide

  • pportunity for public debate

and discussion “Pilot projects” should be tested

  • n different types of licensees

and results considered in rulemaking process

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Process Issues: SCWE (continued)

Any “interim” measures should

  • be developed with stakeholder

input and Commission approval prior to implementation Employee and public confidence

  • critical to success
slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Process Issues: HIRD/50.7

NRC process limited to safety

  • impact and “chilling effect” – does

not address individual remedies DOL process limited to individual

  • remedies, resolutions and

settlements – does not address “chilling effect” or safety impact

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Process Issues: HIRD/50.7 (continued)

NRC can and must enforce “zero

  • tolerance” for retaliation by

licensees NRC can and must assure

  • accountability for intentional

retaliation

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Conclusion

SMRT (Option 3) in SECY-02-0166

  • provides opportunity for

significant improvement from present process NRC would not abandon any of its

  • statutory rights or responsibilities
slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Recommendation

Initiate public rulemaking on

  • SCWE, including common SCWE

attributes and indicators Identify “pilot project” locations

  • Develop “interim” measures with
  • public comment and

Commission approval