Safe, Clean Water Program Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting #4 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Safe, Clean Water Program

Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting #4

Discussion Summary of Subcommittee Meetings: Full SAC Discussion

 Summarize  Project Selection  Governance  Credits/Rebates & Incentives Programs  DACs, Equity, & Ongoing Stakeholder Involvement

Project Selection Subcommittee

Program Outcomes

 Meaningful Water Supply  Meaningful Water Quality  Community Amenities  Greening of streets  Access to Rivers, Lakes, and Streams  Etc.  Develop collaboratively with stakeholders  Provision for ongoing stakeholder involvement  Funding and incorporation of Programs and Projects that

• ffer the greatest potential for significant impact

Project Selection

Project Selection

 Subcommittee Discussion  Ability of all projects to achieve all 3 Program Benefits (Supply,

Quality, Community Amenities)

 Consideration that Meaningful benefits differ per region (unique

conditions)

 Role of Technical Advisory/Oversight Committee  Importance of cost effectiveness, matching funds, O&M  Inclusion of project life cycle cost  How to value individual Program Outcomes

 Supply vs Quality vs Community Amenities

Project Selection

 Next Steps  Solicit sample projects, run them through scoring criteria

Project Selection

Thoughts from the Full SAC

1.

Are there any other considerations you think need to be addressed? Do you have concerns with any of the issues raised in the subcommittee?

2.

Because green infrastructure is related to all 3 Program Benefits of water supply, water quality, and community amenities, how shall it be incorporated into Project Selection Criteria

Governance Subcommittee

Program Outcomes

 Meaningful Water Supply  Meaningful Water Quality  Community Amenities  Greening of streets  Access to Rivers, Lakes, and Streams  Etc.  Develop collaboratively with stakeholders  Provision for ongoing stakeholder involvement  Funding and incorporation of Programs and Projects that

• ffer the greatest potential for significant impact

Governance

Governance

Measure M IRWM E/WMP SMBRC

Transportatio n Improvement Comprehensiv e Regional Water Management Water Quality Compliance Healthy Watershed Geopolitical (COG) Watershed Geopolitical within watershed Watershed City Only w/ Outreach Inclusive: Supply, Quality, Stakeholders City Only Inclusive (Appointed by State) Yes Yes Project-based Yes Collaborative Collaborative City Collaborative Not specified Yes Not specified Not specified

Board Priority Purpose

Meaningful Supply, Quality, Amenities

Boundaries

Watershed

Governance Composition (membership)

Inclusive: Supply, Quality, Stakeholders

Stakeholder Involvement

Yes

Project Selection

Collaborative

Equity and underserved communities

Yes

Governance

 Subcommittee Discussion  Governance boundaries, optimal number of governance

groups/areas

 Use of existing governance structures  2 Tier governance system (subregional & regional)  Role of governance groups in selecting projects  Building on existing planning efforts (IRWM, EWMP, etc)  Membership of governance groups

Governance

Thoughts from the Full SAC

1.

Are there any other considerations you think need to be addressed? Do you have concerns with any of the issues raised in the subcommittee?

2.

Should the Safe Clean Water Program make use of an existing governance structure and existing relationships, or should a new governance structure be created?

Credits/Rebates & Incentives Programs Subcommittee

Program Outcomes

 Meaningful Water Supply  Meaningful Water Quality  Community Amenities  Greening of streets  Access to Rivers, Lakes, and Streams  Etc.  Develop collaboratively with stakeholders  Provision for ongoing stakeholder involvement  Funding and incorporation of Programs and Projects that

• ffer the greatest potential for significant impact

Credits/Rebates & Incentives Programs

Credits/Rebates & Incentives Programs

Credits/Rebates & Incentives Programs

 Subcommittee Discussion  Purpose of Incentives Program vs Credit/Rebate Program  Consistent requirements for implementation  Qualifying activities/infrastructure  Building on existing credit/rebate models e.g. MWD, DWP  Verification/auditing process

Credits/Rebates & Incentives Programs

 Next Steps  Summarize relevant strategies from existing credit/rebate

programs

 Discuss qualifying activities for each program

Credits, Rebates & Incentives

Thoughts from the Full SAC

1.

Are there any other considerations you think need to be addressed? Do you have concerns with any of the issues raised in the subcommittee?

2.

What types of infrastructure or activities should qualify for the Credit/Rebate Program?

DAC, Equity, & Ongoing Stakeholder Involvement Subcommittee

Program Outcomes

 Meaningful Water Supply  Meaningful Water Quality  Community Amenities  Greening of streets  Access to Rivers, Lakes, and Streams  Etc.  Develop collaboratively with stakeholders  Provision for ongoing stakeholder involvement  Funding and incorporation of Programs and Projects that

• ffer the greatest potential for significant impact

DACs, Equity, and Ongoing Stakeholder Involvement

 Subcommittee Discussion  Use of existing State definitions  Tangible benefits to DACs  Capacity Building leading to community engagement

Project funding Governance

 Dedicated Funding for DACs

DACs, Equity, and Ongoing Stakeholder Involvement

 Next Steps  Explore other efforts such as Measure A, First 5, etc

DACs, Equity, and Ongoing Stakeholder Involvement

DACs, Equity, and Ongoing Stakeholder Involvement

Thoughts from the Full SAC

1.

Are there any other considerations you think need to be addressed? Do you have concerns with any of the issues raised in the subcommittee?

2.

How can governance structures be inclusive? What has worked/not worked in other measures?