RTA TaskForce John G. Johnson, Executive Director Association of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

rta taskforce
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

RTA TaskForce John G. Johnson, Executive Director Association of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY RTA TaskForce John G. Johnson, Executive Director Association of Central Oklahoma Governments February 17, 2016 | RECAP on the RTD Boundary Scenarios RECAP REGIONAL TRANSIT DIALOGUE PROCESS Committee 12-MONTH


slide-1
SLIDE 1

REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY

RTA TaskForce

John G. Johnson, Executive Director Association of Central Oklahoma Governments

February 17, 2016 | RECAP on the RTD Boundary Scenarios

slide-2
SLIDE 2

RTA TASK FORCE

February 2016

RECAP

REGIONAL TRANSIT DIALOGUE

12-MONTH TIMEFRAME

April 2009-March 2010

PROCESS Committee Structure “localized” from Kansas City’s Smart Moves initiative.

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

RTA TASK FORCE

February 2016

COMMITTEE STRUCTURE

REGIONAL TRANSIT DIALOGUE

Steering Committee Governance Subcommittee Finance Subcommittee Tech/Land Use Subcommittee Public Outreach Subcommittee

Planning Team

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

RTA TASK FORCE

February 2016

GOVERNANCE & FINANCE SUBCOMMITTEE FOCUS

Governing Structure Subdistrict Geography Financing Options RTA Boundary

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

RTA TASK FORCE

February 2016

TRANSIT SERVICE Geography should include areas that would be most likely to receive transit service.

Based on full build-out of 2005 Fixed Guideway Study.

TAX BASE Geography should be large enough to generate needed tax base. TRANSIT BENEFITS Geography should not include areas that would be unlikely to receive transit benefits.

RTA BOUNDARY CONSIDERATIONS

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

RTA Boundary Would Follow County Lines Initial Vote To Create the RTA Would Take Place On County Level Tax Would Be Collected at the County Level

COUNTY MODEL

slide-7
SLIDE 7

RTA TASK FORCE

February 2016

COUNTY MODEL

OKLAHOMA and CLEVELAND COUNTIES EXAMPLE

Boundary Population

938,000 (2007) FGS Bus Rapid Transit

Map Legend

FGS Commuter Rail Possible RTA Boundary

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

CITY MODEL

RTA Boundary Would Be Set Along City Lines Initial Vote To Create the RTA Would Take Place at the City Level Taxes Would Be Collected at the City Level Potential For Holes If City Does Not Opt In

slide-9
SLIDE 9

RTA TASK FORCE

February 2016

CITY MODEL

Boundary Population

861,000 (2007) FGS Bus Rapid Transit

Map Legend

FGS Commuter Rail Possible RTA Boundary

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

RTA Boundary would not have to follow Pre- Existing Legal Boundaries District would be a unique geography much like a School District If the majority

  • f the District

votes YES, then funding for the RTA is established

DISTRICT MODEL

District would be created by Cities that adopt an MOA HB 2480

slide-11
SLIDE 11

RTA TASK FORCE

February 2016

11

Allowed for Creation of Regional Districts Any combination

  • f any portions of

cities, towns or counties Staffing and Operating added to definition of “operations” Governed by Board of Directors appointed by creating entities

HB 2480

Amended Previous Legislation | 68 O.S. 2011, Sec. 1370.7

RTD Member

  • Rep. Charlie Joyner

Signed by

Governor Fallin May 22, 2014

Critical

Critical Step for Forming a Regional Transit Authority (RTA) District

OKC Chamber

Lobbied and Advocated

slide-12
SLIDE 12

RTA TASK FORCE

February 2016

DISTRICT MODEL

BASED ON URBANIZED AREA

Boundary Population

845,000 (2007) FGS Bus Rapid Transit

Map Legend

FGS Commuter Rail Possible RTA Boundary

12

The RTA Boundary would be similar to the combined Oklahoma City and Norman Urbanized Areas designated by the US Census Bureau

slide-13
SLIDE 13

RTA TASK FORCE

February 2016

DISTRICT MODEL

POPULATION DENSITY Darker Areas Represent Higher Population

FGS Commuter Rail

Map Legend

FGS Bus Rapid Transit Possible RTA Boundary

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

RTA TASK FORCE

February 2016

DISTRICT MODEL

EMPLOYMENT DENSITY

FGS Commuter Rail

Map Legend

FGS Bus Rapid Transit Possible RTA Boundary

14

Darker Areas Represent Higher Employment

slide-15
SLIDE 15

RTA TASK FORCE

February 2016

TAX COLLECTION

Finance/Governance Subcommitte sought help from the Oklahoma Tax Commission to see what was feasible for tax collection purposes.

BOUNDARIES

Easiest if boundary is based on a pre-existing political boundary:

  • State/House Senate Districts
  • School Districts
  • Precincts

THE UZA AS A BASE

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

RTA TASK FORCE

February 2016

DISTRICT MODEL

UZA Boundary and Precincts

16

Urbanized Area Boundary Precinct Boundaries

slide-17
SLIDE 17

RTA TASK FORCE

February 2016

DISTRICT MODEL

Precincts and Current Commercial Land Use

17

Precinct Boundaries Commercial Development

slide-18
SLIDE 18

RTA TASK FORCE

February 2016

DISTRICT MODEL

Precincts and City Limits

18

Revised Possible RTA Boundary Based on Precinct Boundaries

slide-19
SLIDE 19

RTA TASK FORCE

February 2016

Subdistrict Representation?

SUBDISTRICT CONSIDERATIONS

How many subdistricts?

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

RTA TASK FORCE

February 2016

DISTRICT MODEL

Five Subdistricts Scenario

20

Approximately 173,200 Population per Subdistrict (2000 Population)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

RTA TASK FORCE

February 2016

DISTRICT MODEL

Seven Subdistricts Scenario

21

Approximately 123,700 Population per Subdistrict (2000 Population)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

RTA TASK FORCE

February 2016

DISTRICT MODEL

Nine Subdistricts Scenario

22

Approximately 96,000 Population per Subdistrict (2000 Population)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

RTA TASK FORCE

February 2016

PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

POLLING

QUESTIONS?

ASSOCIATION of CENTRAL OKLAHOMA GOVERNMENTS acogok.org | jgjohnson@acogok.org | 405.234.2264

23