rolling the dice flipping an elementary probability and
play

Rolling the Dice: Flipping an elementary probability and statistics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Rolling the Dice: Flipping an elementary probability and statistics classroom Jerry Orloff and Jonathan Bloom Mathematics Department and Broad Institute, MIT jorloff@math.mit.edu jbloom@broadinstitute.org Support from the Davis Foundation


  1. Rolling the Dice: Flipping an elementary probability and statistics classroom Jerry Orloff and Jonathan Bloom Mathematics Department and Broad Institute, MIT jorloff@math.mit.edu jbloom@broadinstitute.org Support from the Davis Foundation and PI/visionary Haynes Miller Sept. 26, 2017 Jerry Orloff, Jonathan Bloom (MIT Math) Rolling the Dice Sept. 26, 2017 1 / 18

  2. Overview What we inherited 1 What we created 2 Demonstration 3 What we learned 4 Syllabus (if time) 5 Jerry Orloff, Jonathan Bloom (MIT Math) Rolling the Dice Sept. 26, 2017 2 / 18

  3. What we inherited What we inherited 18.05: Introduction to probability and statistics. Traditional lecture class for non-math majors Dwindling enrollment An interest in new approaches. active learning (Haynes Miller) online learning (the world) Jerry Orloff, Jonathan Bloom (MIT Math) Rolling the Dice Sept. 26, 2017 3 / 18

  4. What we inherited Transition New classroom New pedagogy New technology New curriculum (at the end if time) Jerry Orloff, Jonathan Bloom (MIT Math) Rolling the Dice Sept. 26, 2017 4 / 18

  5. What we created Room and video [Show video clip, full video on OCW 18.05 site (link below)] Jerry Orloff, Jonathan Bloom (MIT Math) Rolling the Dice Sept. 26, 2017 5 / 18

  6. What we created Active learning, flipped classroom Meet 3 x 80min in TEAL room 60 students, 2 teachers, 3 assistants Reading / reading questions on MITx Minimal lecturing Group problem solving at boards Whole class and table discussions Clicker questions Computer-based studio using R Traditional psets and pset checker Jerry Orloff, Jonathan Bloom (MIT Math) Rolling the Dice Sept. 26, 2017 6 / 18

  7. Demonstration Bayesian dice Jerry Orloff, Jonathan Bloom (MIT Math) Rolling the Dice Sept. 26, 2017 7 / 18

  8. Demonstration Bayesian dice 2 Jerry Orloff, Jonathan Bloom (MIT Math) Rolling the Dice Sept. 26, 2017 7 / 18

  9. Demonstration Bayesian dice 2 1 Jerry Orloff, Jonathan Bloom (MIT Math) Rolling the Dice Sept. 26, 2017 7 / 18

  10. Demonstration Bayesian dice 2 1 6 Jerry Orloff, Jonathan Bloom (MIT Math) Rolling the Dice Sept. 26, 2017 7 / 18

  11. Demonstration Bayesian dice 2 1 6 5 Jerry Orloff, Jonathan Bloom (MIT Math) Rolling the Dice Sept. 26, 2017 7 / 18

  12. Demonstration Bayesian dice 2 1 6 5 8 Jerry Orloff, Jonathan Bloom (MIT Math) Rolling the Dice Sept. 26, 2017 7 / 18

  13. Demonstration Bayesian dice 2 1 6 5 8 7 3 2 7 Jerry Orloff, Jonathan Bloom (MIT Math) Rolling the Dice Sept. 26, 2017 7 / 18

  14. Demonstration Bayesian dice 2 1 6 5 8 7 3 2 7 3 6 5 6 Jerry Orloff, Jonathan Bloom (MIT Math) Rolling the Dice Sept. 26, 2017 7 / 18

  15. Demonstration Bayesian dice 2 1 6 5 8 7 3 2 7 3 6 5 6 4 8 8 6 7 8 7 5 1 Jerry Orloff, Jonathan Bloom (MIT Math) Rolling the Dice Sept. 26, 2017 7 / 18

  16. What we learned Active learning notes Standing up is beneficial Physical space is critical Both peer and teacher instruction Student self-assessment Teachers formative assessment Accelerates learning to teach content Coming soon: EMES talk by David Pengelley on how to flip a class. Jerry Orloff, Jonathan Bloom (MIT Math) Rolling the Dice Sept. 26, 2017 8 / 18

  17. What we learned Technology and flipped classroom Reading questions Attendance Pset checker Jerry Orloff, Jonathan Bloom (MIT Math) Rolling the Dice Sept. 26, 2017 9 / 18

  18. What we learned Computer studio Once a week Used R Don’t teach programming. Let students do it! Heavily scaffolded projects designed to reinforce concepts Graded –need efficient grading system Tested –open internet Took about 3 years to get a good set of projects Jerry Orloff, Jonathan Bloom (MIT Math) Rolling the Dice Sept. 26, 2017 10 / 18

  19. What we learned Common questions How much work was all this? A tremendous amount, especially at first, because we changed so many things at once. Using MITx added some overhead and requires someone willing to fight with it. Much less work by the third year. How much are you able to cover? More material with greater understanding. Jerry Orloff, Jonathan Bloom (MIT Math) Rolling the Dice Sept. 26, 2017 11 / 18

  20. What we learned Other observations Active learning is more fun Co-teaching is more fun Students like getting to know their teachers Students like targeted reading more than lecture video Students love the pset checker Jerry Orloff, Jonathan Bloom (MIT Math) Rolling the Dice Sept. 26, 2017 12 / 18

  21. What we learned OpenCourseWare and OCW Educator All 18.05 course materials and a discussion of the pedagogy and educational decisions is on OCW: https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/ 18-05-introduction-to-probability-and-statistics-spring-2014/ Jerry Orloff, Jonathan Bloom (MIT Math) Rolling the Dice Sept. 26, 2017 13 / 18

  22. What we learned Broad Course Goals Learn the language and core concepts of probability theory Understand basic principles of statistical inference (Bayesian, frequentist, bootstrap) Build a starter statistical toolbox with appreciation for both utility and limitations Use software and simulation to do statistics (R). Become an informed consumer of statistical information (paper analysis). Prepare for further coursework or on-the-job study (active learning). Jerry Orloff, Jonathan Bloom (MIT Math) Rolling the Dice Sept. 26, 2017 14 / 18

  23. Syllabus (if time) Curriculum Traditional course: Probability: counting, random variables, gallery of distributions, central limit theorem. Statistics: linear regression, estimation, confidence intervals, p-values, NHST, bootstrapping Changes: A Bayesian bridge Heavy use of computers for simulation and visualization Jerry Orloff, Jonathan Bloom (MIT Math) Rolling the Dice Sept. 26, 2017 15 / 18

  24. Syllabus (if time) The fork in the road Everyone uses Bayes’ P ( H | D ) = P ( D | H ) P ( H ) Probability formula when the prior P ( D ) (mathematics) P ( H ) is known. Bayesian path Frequentist path Statistics (art) P Posterior ( H | D ) = P ( D | H ) P prior ( H ) Likelihood L ( H ; D ) = P ( D | H ) P ( D ) Bayesians require a prior, so Without a known prior frequen- they develop one from the best tists draw inferences from just information they have. the likelihood function. Jerry Orloff, Jonathan Bloom (MIT Math) Rolling the Dice Sept. 26, 2017 16 / 18

  25. Syllabus (if time) Course Arc Probability: (uncertain world, perfect knowledge of the uncertainty) Basics of probability: counting, independence, conditional probability Statistics I: pure applied probability: (data in an uncertain world, perfect knowledge of the uncertainty) Bayesian inference with known priors Statistics II: applied probability: (data in an uncertain world, imperfect knowledge of the uncertainty) Bayesian inference with unknown priors Frequentist confidence intervals and significance tests Resampling methods: bootstrapping Discussion of scientific papers Computation, simulation and visualization using R and Javascript applets were used throughout the course. Jerry Orloff, Jonathan Bloom (MIT Math) Rolling the Dice Sept. 26, 2017 17 / 18

  26. Syllabus (if time) Thank you Thank you Jerry Orloff, Jonathan Bloom (MIT Math) Rolling the Dice Sept. 26, 2017 18 / 18

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend