Risk Management Through Water Efficiency Auditing A. Todd Lusk, PE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

risk management through water efficiency auditing
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Risk Management Through Water Efficiency Auditing A. Todd Lusk, PE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Environmental Federation of Oklahoma October 30, 2014 Risk Management Through Water Efficiency Auditing A. Todd Lusk, PE ENVIRON International Corporation Florence, KY Presentation Topics You Cannot Manage What You Cannot Measure


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Environmental Federation of Oklahoma October 30, 2014

  • A. Todd Lusk, PE

ENVIRON International Corporation Florence, KY

Risk Management Through Water Efficiency Auditing

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Presentation Topics

  • You Cannot Manage What You Cannot Measure –

Understanding Water Quality and Quantity

  • Beyond the Four Rs – Elements of a Comprehensive

Water Audit

  • What Counts Can’t Always Be Counted – Priorities

and Secondary Impacts for Water Reduction Opportunities

  • Questions and Answers
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Integrated Water Management

Efficient Use

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Baseline Residual

Green Water Green Water Blue Water Blue Water Grey Water Grey Water

Footprinting Watershed Management

Risk Mapping

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Water Risk Drivers

  • Economic (Pricing)
  • Community “License to Operate”
  • Physical Scarcity (or Competing Interests)
  • Brand Reputation (w Customer & Consumer)
  • Corporate Reporting of Material Risks
  • Regulatory Constraints
slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Recognizing and Determining “Quality”

  • General chemistry

– pH – Conductivity/TDS/Salt – TSS

  • Process-specific

chemistry

– Organics – Metals

  • Parameters for

recycle technologies

– Cations/anions – Scaling potential – Silt Density Index

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

The “Four Rs” and Beyond

Treated Wastewater Discharge Reuse Treatment

Manufacturing

Water Source

REPLENISH REUSE RECYCLE REDUCE

Wastewater Treatment Manufacturing Wastewater Treatment

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Expanding Water Stewardship

Life Cycle (Supply Chain + Producer + Consumer) Watershed Community Plant

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

The Water (Audit) Cycle

Green Water Blue Water Grey Water 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Baseline

Benchmarking & Baseline Footprint “Reasonable Reductions” in Use Water Efficiency Assessments “Reasonable Investments” Minimize Impact and/or Offset Residual Footprint Water Risk Reduction Strategy Residual Footprint

Green Water Blue Water Grey Water Green Water Blue Water Grey Water 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Baseline Residual
slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Pre-Audit Investigations

  • Data, data, data

– Balance known water intakes, uses, and outputs – Chronological trending – Usage and costs (current + projected)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Comprehensive Audit

  • Project Components

– Review Facility Operations and Water & Salt Balances – Identify Opportunities for Flow/Cost Reduction – Rank Opportunities Based on Expected Payback Period

  • Target Opportunities

– Cooling/Utility Water Sources – Water Monitoring & Minimization – “Clean/Dirty” Stream Segregation – Steam/Condensate Management – Treatment/Reuse

  • Holistic Evaluation

– Water Savings vs. Economic/Multimedia Impacts – Flow Reduction vs. Effluent Quality

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Simple Questions

  • Where is this stream coming from?
  • Where it this stream going?
  • What is the water quality of the stream?

– Do I have enough data to determine quality?

  • Can I measure or estimate flow on this stream?

– Does it vary? If so, why?

  • What else can I do here?

– Apply the 4 Rs – Compare quality to other streams

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Ranking Reduction Opportunities

  • Projects ranked on five criteria:
  • 1. Capital Rating (implementation cost)
  • 2. Savings Rating (flow/cost)
  • 3. Technical Feasibility Rating (% chance of successful

implementation)

  • 4. Implementation Difficulty Rating (level of analysis,

engineering, and plant impact)

  • 5. Timeframe Rating (project duration)
  • Overall Rating = product of Ratings 1-4

– Rating 5 typically dependent on others, thus considered separately

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Ranking Reduction Opportunities

Opportunity Overall Rating Water Savings (kgal/yr) % of 2013 Usage (%) Implementation Cost ($) Net Savings ($/yr) Payback (yrs)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Reduction Opportunities - Behavioral

Category Examples of Water Reduction Housekeeping § Reducing wash down flow, volume or frequency (e.g., high-pressure hoses, flow restrictors, dry cleanup procedures) Maintenance § Leak inspection and repair § Maintenance of flow measurement devices § Maintenance of flow delivery devices (shower heads, spray nozzles, hoses) Training § Develop tools to identify critical flow balance items § Establish employee awareness of reduction plans § Solicit employee suggestions/participation § Train the trainer approach § Standardized toolkit

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Reduction Opportunities - Process

Category Examples of Water Reduction Metering

§ Install meters and recorders at key flow locations (intakes,

  • utfalls, major consumers)

§ Develop estimating tools for unmeasured flows (e.g., cooling tower evaporation, product loss) § Maintain flow balance as operational tool

Quality Constraints

§ Establish quality criteria for indirect uses (e.g., cooling towers) § Reduce intake/blowdown rates to minimize fresh water usage in above processes (i.e., longer cycle times) § Introduce water treatment chemicals to improve cycle time § Set pump cooling/flushing water to minimum requirement per manufacturer recommendations

Process Controls

§ Review process control variables to identify less flow-intensive controls (e.g., pH or conductivity instead of time, timer instead of operator visual check) § Determine if changes to production scheduling could impact water balance § Automatic controls (e.g. solenoids) on product washing and conveyors to stop flow when production halts

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Reduction Opportunities - Facility Upgrades

Category Examples of Water Reduction Low-flow and No- flow Processes § Replace water-based product cleaning with air systems § Replace water-based lubrication systems with dry lube (e.g., silicon-based) systems Water Reuse § Return “clean” streams into makeup for “less clean” streams with less stringent quality criteria Water Treatment § Plant-wide or process-specific water treatment (ultrafiltration and/or reverse osmosis) for recycle § Recovery and treatment of inflow reject streams (e.g., RO reject, filter backwashes) for in-plant use § Minimize backwash water volumes (proper chemical dosing, backwash on ∆P rather than schedule)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Cost-Benefit Analysis

Increasing Cost (Logarithmic) Increasing Water Reduction (Linear)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Indirect Benefits

  • Facility Production

– Increased throughput, lower unit cost

  • Public Perception

– Local, regional, national

  • Knowledge Transfer

– Audit findings at one site applicable to others

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Trading Quantity for Quality

  • Water reduction inherently

impacts effluent quality

– Residual organics (BOD, TOC) – TDS (salt) – Heavy metals – Suspended solids – Temperature

  • Additional treatment or

pretreatment may be needed

  • Quality changes may impact

existing treatment

– Chemical usage – Biological treatment toxicity – Whole effluent toxicity

Increased Recycle Effluent Quality

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

In-Plant Impacts of Water Reduction

  • Higher concentrations of acidity/

alkalinity

– Corrosion – Scaling

  • Higher concentrations of salt/

TDS/chloride

– Corrosion

  • May require additional

pretreatment steps

– Neutralization – Softening

  • May require MOC changes

– HDPE/PVC vs. Cu/steel

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Trans-Media Impacts

Concept Water Recycle/Reuse Project Solid Waste NOx Coal CO2 SOx Hg Power

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

A “Water-Energy Nexus”

Increasing Energy Demand

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Closing Thought

When the well is dry, we know the worth of water.

Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard’s Almanac

” “

slide-24
SLIDE 24