the auditing of social accounts
play

THE AUDITING OF SOCIAL ACCOUNTS SOME GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS - PDF document

16/11/2012 THE AUDITING OF SOCIAL ACCOUNTS SOME GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS INDEPENDENT AUDITING (with certification) OF SOCIAL ACCOUNTS A DEBATE (CONSIDERING IN THIS CASE ONLY ITALY): A) ONLY VOLUNTARY B) COMPULSORY BY LAW 1


  1. 16/11/2012 THE AUDITING OF SOCIAL ACCOUNTS SOME GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS INDEPENDENT AUDITING (with certification) OF SOCIAL ACCOUNTS • A DEBATE (CONSIDERING IN THIS CASE ONLY ITALY): • A) ONLY VOLUNTARY • B) COMPULSORY BY LAW 1

  2. 16/11/2012 ONLY VOLUNTARY1 • 1) TO AVOID BUSINESS OF CERTIFICATION AND “LABEL”’S COMPANIES • 2) NOT TO CURB COMPANIES’WORK IN AN ALREADY STAGNANT ECONOMY • 3) BETTER TO LEAVE TO THE MARKET THE VALUATION ONLY VOLUNTARY2 • 4) RISK TO CONFUSE THE SOCIAL ACCOUNT’S AUDITOR WITH AN “ETHICAL AUDITOR”: RISK OF INSTRUMENTALISM • 5) MULTIDIMENSIONALITY OF DATA AND INFORMATION MAKE MORE DIFFICULT THE AUDITING PROCESS THAN IN FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 2

  3. 16/11/2012 COMPULSORY BY LAW1 • 1) TO GUARANTEE STAKEHOLDERS THAT SOCIAL ACCOUNTS ARE RELIABLE • 2) THE DISCOVER OF UNRELIABLE SELF- REFERENTIAL DOCUMENTS WOULD DIFFUSE A GENERAL MISTRUST ON EVERY SOCIAL ACCOUNT COMPULSORY BY LAW2 • 3) ASYMMETRIC INFORMATIONS CAN REDUCE A LOT THE ABILITY OF THE MARKET TO SELECT “GOOD” SOCIAL ACCOUNTS • 4) THE ABSENCE OF INDEPENDENTLY ASSURED DOCUMENTS COULD FAVOUR “RUMORS” AND UNJUSTIFIED VOICES AGAINST COMPANIES 3

  4. 16/11/2012 COMPULSORY BY LAW3 • 5) A COMPLETE FREEDOM AND VOLUNTARINESS BOTH IN DECIDING TO BE AUDITED AND IN CHOOSING AUDITORS CAN DIFFUSE A VERY IMPERFECT (AND PROBABLY NOT MUCH RELIABLE) MARKET OF ASSURANCE SOME CONCLUSION ISSUES • AN “AUTHORITY” INSTEAD OF AN AUDITOR? CAN THIS AUTORITY CONTROL EFFECTIVELY ALL? WHY DOES NOT EXIST AN AUTHORITY (BUT CERTIFICATION) IN FINANCIAL STATEMENT? WHAT ABOUT MULTIDIMENSIONALITY? • WHY DOES NOT EXIST MARKET SELECTION WITH FINANCIAL ACCOUNTS? • THERE ARE AUDITING PROBLEMS ALSO FOR FINANCIAL ACCOUNTS 4

  5. 16/11/2012 FINALITY OF AUDITING PROCESS (according to GBS and the author of these slides) • THE AUDITOR’S AIM IS NOT TO CERTIFY THE “GOODNESS” OF A COMPANY, BUT ONLY TO GUARANTEE THE STAKEHOLDERS THAT: • 1) THE COMPANY IS RESPECTING THE DECLARED STANDARD (GRI, GBS, AA1000,…) • 2) DATA AND INFORMATION ARE CONSISTENT WITH DECLARED PRINCIPLES • 3) THE DOCUMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH AVALIABLE DATA AND INFORMATION • 4) FINANCIAL STATEMENT IS RELIABLE AA1000S • AA1000S IS ESSENTIALLY AIMED TO “CLOSING THE CREDIBILITY GAP” BETWEEN DECLARATIONS AND FINALITIES OF PRACTISING STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND ITS REAL CREDIBILITY • EVERY AUDITING AND ASSURANCE PROCESS HAS THE AIM OF INCREASING CREDIBILITY OF A DOCUMENT (ALSO IN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT) • VERY DIFFUSED 5

  6. 16/11/2012 AA1000S • FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE OF AA1000S IS • • INCLUSIVITY • THAT IS IN GENERAL BASIC PRINCIPLE FOR ALL AA1000 DOCUMENTS AA1000S ASSURANCE JUDGEMENT1 • IT MUST HOLD AT LEAST: • 1) DECLARATION OF USING AA1000S ASSURANCE STANDARD • 2) BASIC DESCRIPTION, PARTICULARLY ABOUT ASSURANCE LEVEL PURSUED 6

  7. 16/11/2012 AA1000S ASSURANCE JUDGEMENT2 • 3) ASSURANCE JUDGEMENT IN THE DOCUMENT • 4) ADDED COMMENTS 7

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend