revision of the ncar exchange program
play

Revision of the NCAR Exchange Program Dr. I sabelle Dem ade NW I - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Revision of the NCAR Exchange Program Dr. I sabelle Dem ade NW I Chair IMDRF Sydney 23-26/ 09/ 2012 Background - Current scope : - exchange of (confidential) info on serious Adverse Event (AE) concerning MD with global distribution


  1. Revision of the NCAR Exchange Program Dr. I sabelle Dem ade NW I Chair IMDRF Sydney 23-26/ 09/ 2012

  2. Background - � Current scope : - exchange of (confidential) info on serious Adverse Event (AE) concerning MD with global distribution - � Participants - GHTF Reg. Authorities - Reg. Authorities fulfilling the criteria of N38 & successfully trained on N54 & N79

  3. Background • � State of Play □ Total: 29 participants (out of which 9 are non GHTF members) � interest of AHWP members & more recently South America □ � number of NCARs exchanged: approx. 250 per year.

  4. Underlying requirem ents � one focal point for supervision & distribution: NCAR Exchange Program Secretariat (currently TGA) • � Expanding membership � training (and re-training) requires training materials, trainers,.. = N 120: training on PMS

  5. Critical Review -Step 1 • 2 regulators-only sessions prior to SG2 meetings Ł NCAR Exchange provides useful inform ation . • Ł Downside: uneven participation • - limited contribution from key GHTF jurisdictions - poor participation from new members ram.

  6. Critical Review -Step 1 • Ł The benefits: • early access to relevant safety-related information; knowledge about action taken (FSCA, recall,..) • Ł The frustration: • why are so few ( GHTF) jurisdictions using the NCAR Exchange Program?

  7. Critical Review -Step 1 • Ł Trend : besides AE & FSCA/ recalls reporting □ sharing information on action taken by Manufacturer (Field Safety Notice), □ on newly identified issues (and request for feedback) • □ requesting information on post-market issue.

  8. Critical Review -Step 2 • conducting a survey on participants'views: • - on contribution level, • - recommendations for improvement • - training needs, -scope Oct. 2 0 1 2

  9. Critical Review -Step 2 (cont.) Reviewing survey data & setting priorities Through 2 0 1 2 -early 2 0 1 3 - Step 3 Developing proposals Through 2 0 1 3

  10. Critical Review • W G com position � Experience: SG2 regulators & fresh view • � Geographic representation: GHTF jurisdictions, IMDRF new member(s), + inviting AHWP representative; • � Must have: operational responsibilities in post market safety.

  11. Thank you for your attention! K

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend